Nurse Intervention Project
VIP
A Randomized Trial to Assess the (Cost) Effectiveness of the Use of the Distress Thermometer by a Nurse in Addition to Usual Care for Patients Treated With Curative Intent for Breast Cancer.
1 other identifier
interventional
193
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The use of interventions for cancer-related distress is important to reduce this distress. Distress has a negative impact on quality of life, the recovery during and after treatment and may even adversely affect survival. There is insufficient attention to the systematic approach to psychosocial problems in cancer patients in the Netherlands. A task force discussed and studied which instrument measures psychosocial problems best. The distress thermometer ("lastmeter") had the best results. A guideline is written to use the distress thermometer for patients with cancer and will be used in hospitals in the Netherlands. However, it is not clear what the effects are of the use of the distress thermometer on the psychosocial wellbeing of the patient. Furthermore, it is also unknown whether the use of the distress thermometer leads to cost-effective care. The study focuses on the use of the distress thermometer in breast cancer patients. An efficiency study (RCT) will be conducted to evaluate the systematic use of the distress thermometer and its discussion by a nurse as compared to the usual care provided to outpatients who are treated with curative intent for breast cancer by their treating physicians. The clinical and economic impact of the use of the Distress thermometer will be assessed in comparison with usual care.The recruitment of patients will take place in the out-patient clinic of a university hospital. Patients will be followed from diagnose until two years after finishing their treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2010
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 17, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 24, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2016
CompletedDecember 5, 2016
November 1, 2016
2.9 years
March 17, 2010
December 2, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Subscale quality of life of the questionnaire: EORTC QLQ C30
Subscale quality of life of the questionnaire: EORTC QLQ C30
After each treatment completion, during follow up; first year every 3 months, second year every 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Other subscales
After each treatment completion, during follow up; first year every 3 months, second year every 6 months
Study Arms (2)
intervention group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe intervention is to apply the distress thermometer as written in the guideline written by 'Vereniging Integrale Kankercentra' title: 'Detecteren behoefte psychosociale zorg. The distress thermometer is collected from the experimental group and then discussed by a trained nurse.
control group
NO INTERVENTIONusual care
Interventions
to apply the distress thermometer as written in the guideline written by 'Vereniging Integrale Kankercentra' title: 'Detecteren behoefte psychosociale zorg. The distress thermometer is collected from the experimental group and then discussed by a trained nurse
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Histologically proven malignancy of the breast
- Curative treatment
- Dominated the dutch language
- Age \> 18 year
You may not qualify if:
- Previously treated for a malignancy
- Psychiatric problems that adherence this study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Medical Centre Nijmegen
Nijmegen, 6500, Netherlands
Related Publications (1)
Ploos van Amstel FK, Prins JB, van der Graaf WT, Peters ME, Ottevanger PB. The effectiveness of a nurse-led intervention with the distress thermometer for patients treated with curative intent for breast cancer: design of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2016 Jul 25;16:520. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2565-x.
PMID: 27455960DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
P. B. Ottevanger, Dr
University Medical Centre Nijmegen
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 17, 2010
First Posted
March 24, 2010
Study Start
March 1, 2010
Primary Completion
February 1, 2013
Study Completion
July 1, 2016
Last Updated
December 5, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-11