The Immunologic Reaction to Polypropylene Mesh in Inguinal Hernioplasty
1 other identifier
observational
60
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The notable development and diffusion of prosthetic surgery of the abdominal wall over the last few years has led to the introduction of light weight meshes. The efficacy of inguinal hernia repair with light weight prosthesis, as well as the better or worse biotolerability with respect to those of light weight, remains questionable in literature, where a clear answer still remains to be given. If there exists a connection between the quantity of material implanted, the immunological reaction to the mesh, the induced oxidative stress and the degree of cicatrization, and consequently the long-term result of the efficacy of the operation, remains to be demonstrated. There are few studies on the immunological reaction to polypropylene meshes, and none on the oxidative stress induced by the mesh. Moreover, only one study has been published that clearly correlates the immunological reaction to the amount of prosthetic material, but was carried out on only a few patients. The aim of this research is to show if there is a relationship between the amount of prosthetic material used and immunological reactions as well as postoperative oxidative stress, and thus to evaluate, if present, the differences in the biological reaction and biotolerability between light-weight and heavy-weight meshes on a statistically significant number of patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Mar 2010
Shorter than P25 for all trials
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 18, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 19, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2010
CompletedMarch 23, 2010
February 1, 2010
6 months
March 18, 2010
March 22, 2010
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Immune response assessment
Cytokine measurements
0, 6h, 72h and 12 days
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Oxidative stress evaluation
0, 6h, 24h, 48h and 12 days
Study Arms (2)
Heavy weight mesh
This cohort includes patients undergoing inguinal hernioplasty with polypropylene heavy weight mesh.
Light weight mesh
This cohort includes patients undergoing inguinal hernioplasty with polypropylene light weight mesh.
Interventions
A conventional Prosthetic Inguinal Hernioplasty (Trabucco's Technique) will be performed by using polypropylene mesh.
Eligibility Criteria
All patients affected by primary inguinal hernia
You may qualify if:
- All patients affected by primary inguinal hernia
You may not qualify if:
- Diabetes
- Corticosteroids treatment
- Immunosuppressive drugs
- Cirrhotic patients
- Chronic inflammatory disease
- Neoplastic patients
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
University Hospital of Catania
Catania, 95125, Italy
University Hospital of Catania
Catania, 95125, Italy
Related Publications (2)
1) Agarwal BB, et al. Prospective double-blind randomized controlled study comparing heavy- and lightweight polypropylene mesh in totally extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia: early results.Surg Endosc. 2009 Feb;23(2):242-7. Epub 2008 Oct 16. 2) Di Vita G, et al. Impact of different texture of polypropylene mesh on the inflammatory response. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2008 Jan-Mar;21(1):207-14. 3) Cobb WS, Burns JM, et. al. Textile analysis of heavy weight, mid-weight, and light weight polypropylene mesh in a porcine ventral hernia model.J Surg Res. 2006 Nov;136(1):1-7. Epub 2006 Sep 22. 4) Weyhe D, Schmitz I, et al. Experimental comparison of monofile light and heavy polypropylene meshes: less weight does not mean less biological response. World J Surg. 2006 Aug;30(8):1586-91. 5) Di Vita G, Balistreri CR, et al. Systemic inflammatory response in erderly patients following hernioplastical operation. Immun Ageing. 2006 Mar 29;3:3. 6) Di Vita G, Patti R, et al. Acute phase response in oldest-old individuals after surgical stress. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 Mar;54(3):561-3. 7) Di Vita G, D'Agostino P, et al. Acute inflammatory response after inguinal and incisional hernia repair with implantation of polypropylene mesh of different size. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2005 Aug;390(4):306-11. Epub 2005 Feb 3. 8) Brancato G, Gandolfo L, et al. [Biologic tolerance of prolene prosthesis in inguinal hernia repair] Chir Ital. 2003 Sep-Oct;55(5):707-13. 9) Di Vita G, Milano S,et al. Cytokine modifications after tension-free hernioplasty or open conventional inguinal hernia repair. Am J Surg. 2001 Jun;181(6):487-91. 10) Di Vita G, Milano S, et al. Tension-free hernia repair is associated with an increase in inflammatory response markers against the mesh. Am J Surg. 2000 Sep;180(3):203-7. 11) Gürleyik E, Gürleyik G, et al. The inflammatory response to open tension-free inguinal hernioplasty versus conventional repairs. Am J Surg. 1998 Mar;175(3):179-82.
BACKGROUNDDonati M, Brancato G, Grosso G, Li Volti G, La Camera G, Cardi F, Basile F, Donati A. Immunological reaction and oxidative stress after light or heavy polypropylene mesh implantation in inguinal hernioplasty: A CONSORT-prospective, randomized, clinical trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jun;95(24):e3791. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003791.
PMID: 27310955DERIVED
Biospecimen
Serum
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marcello Donati, MD, PhD
University of Catania
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Angelo Donati, MD
University of Catania
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 18, 2010
First Posted
March 19, 2010
Study Start
March 1, 2010
Primary Completion
September 1, 2010
Study Completion
December 1, 2010
Last Updated
March 23, 2010
Record last verified: 2010-02