Diagnosis of Intestinal Motility by Image Analysis Using Capsule Endoscopy
Intestinal Motility Evaluation by Endoluminal Image Analysis Using Capsule Endoscopy (CE-EIA): a Multi-center Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
143
5 countries
6
Brief Summary
Conventional intestinal manometry is the current gold standard for the evaluation of intestinal motility, and identifies patterns of intestinal dysmotility. However intestinal manometry involves intestinal intubation with consequent discomfort for the patients, and requires considerable technical expertise and knowledge for interpretation of the data. Hence, to date this method has limited indications and is restricted to very few referral centers around the world. A novel method for evaluation of intestinal motility has been developed based on endoluminal image analysis using the endoscopic PillCam capsule, In contrast to manometry, this technique is minimally invasive, the technical aspects are simple, and the analysis is fully automated by a computer program. The technique has been validated in a group of patients with intestinal dysmotility and healthy subjects, and has demonstrated over 90% sensitivity and specificity. This technique needs now to be validated in a large multinational population, to further develop a robust discrimination algorithm for widespread diagnostic application. Furthermore, whereas manometry only recognizes neuropathic, myopathic and obstructive motor patterns, endoluminal image analysis may identify different categories of patients depending on the clinical presentation and the etiologic factors involved. This study is designed to provide evidence that the algorithm, using images created by PillCam SB2 capsules, is at least as good as small bowel manometry in diagnosing severe dysmotility.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2009
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
6 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 11, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 12, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 23, 2014
CompletedJuly 22, 2020
January 1, 2020
3.8 years
March 11, 2010
February 25, 2014
July 8, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To Evaluate Accuracy of Endoluminal Image Analysis by Capsule Endoscopy in Detecting Severe Dysmotility
Patients were indicated for small bowel manometry based on one or both of the following symptoms: * Pseudo obstruction * Unintentional body weight loss
Up to 7 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
To Assess Correlation Between Patient Clinical Symptoms and CE-EIA
Up to 7 months
Study Arms (2)
Patients
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients previously indicated for manometry
Healthy volunteers
ACTIVE COMPARATORHealthy volunteers
Interventions
The disposable, ingestible PillCam SB 2 Capsule, part no. FGS-0180, is designed to acquire video images during natural propulsion through the small bowel. The capsule transmits acquired images via RF communication channel to the DataRecorder located outside the body.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient's age is 16-80 years, inclusive.
- One of the following SB manometry procedures:
- Underwent SB manometry within five years if results were abnormal
- Underwent SB manometry within 1 year if results were normal
- Scheduled for SB manometry within six months of enrollment date
- Patient was indicated for small bowel manometry based on one or both of the following symptoms:
- Pseudo obstruction of the small bowel: symptoms resembling mechanical small bowel obstruction without evidence of luminal compromise of the gut. Mechanical occlusion is ruled-out by endoscopic and / or radiological studies following the criteria of the attending physician.
- Patients may have any of the following:
- recurrent acute episodes (at least two) with air fluid levels (as evidenced at least once by abdominal X-ray), or
- chronic symptoms with small bowel dilation resembling a partial mechanical obstruction.
- Patients will be tested during period of (non-acute) remission. - Chronic severe GI symptoms with inability to maintain normal body weight: abdominal symptoms (such as nausea, abdominal distension, discomfort or pain) produce inability to maintain a normal body weight as defined by unintentional weight loss of at least 10% of original body weight before onset of symptoms or a BMI \< 18.5, while on a normal diet (without oral dietary supplements, enteral or parenteral feeding).
- These should be chronic symptoms lasting at least 6 months.
- \- Patient or legal guardian agrees to sign consent form
You may not qualify if:
- Acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive symptoms.
- Mechanical obstruction of any kind such as definite long stricture seen on radiological exam.
- Suspected GI stricture, followed by Agile® study that could not prove patency of the GI tract.
- Known history of small bowel organic disease such as Crohn's Disease or Celiac.
- Patient suffers from any condition, such as swallowing problems or having an implanted cardiac pacemaker or defibrillator which precludes compliance with study and/or device instructions.
- Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs including aspirin, (twice weekly or more) during the 4 weeks preceding the CE exam.
- Patient has undergone gastrectomy (segmental small bowel resection over 30%).
- During the period between small bowel manometry and Capsule endoscopy, the patient has undergone any abdominal surgical procedures other than appendectomy, cholecystectomy, abdominal wall hernia repair or catheter placing for enteral feeding.
- Manometry was performed before any other allowed GI procedure.
- Patient is pregnant.
- Known abuse of alcohol or illicit substances.
- Patient presently presenting with an acute life threatening condition.
- Participating in another clinical study within 30 days.
- Volunteer's age is 16-80 years, inclusive.
- Known diabetes mellitus
- +7 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Medtronic - MITGlead
Study Sites (6)
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Mayo Clinic
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85259, United States
Mayo Clinic,
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
Center for GI Research, KU Leuven,
Leuven, 3000, Belgium
Internal Medicine & Gastroenterology, University of Bologna,
Bologna, I-40138, Italy
Autonomous University of Barcelona
Barcelona, 08035, Spain
Departement of Internal Medicine, Sahlgrenska Universitetss
Gothenburg, 41345, Sweden
Limitations and Caveats
This study terminated early due to slow recruitment. Phase 1 of the study enrolled but was intended to train an algorithm only.The validation phase 2 which supported objectives was not completed and the study objectives could not be evaluated.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- director of clinical affairs
- Organization
- Given Imaging
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Fernando Azpiroz, Prof.
Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 11, 2010
First Posted
March 12, 2010
Study Start
February 1, 2009
Primary Completion
December 1, 2012
Study Completion
June 1, 2013
Last Updated
July 22, 2020
Results First Posted
June 23, 2014
Record last verified: 2020-01