The Benefit of Prophylactic Anticonvulsant in Post Cardiac Arrest Syndrome With Induced Mild Hypothermia
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Cardiac arrest is a leading cause of sudden death, but the survival rate of cardiac arrest is only 5-35%. Although, the first resuscitation of cardiac arrest patient would be success, the hypoxic brain injury after cardiac arrest is an important cause of the mortality and the morbidity. For the management of the hypoxic brain injury after cardiac arrest, American Heart Association and European Resuscitation Council recommend induced mild hypothermia therapy. And, ILCOR(International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation) announced the standard treatment of post cardiac arrest syndrome(the success state of first resuscitation of the cardiac arrest patient) included the induced mild hypothermia therapy at September, 2008. The generalized seizure and myoclonus arise in over 60% of post cardiac arrest syndrome patients and they are very difficult to control. Also, the occurrence of them implies poor prognosis of the patient. Although, mild hypothermia therapy could be decrease the development and propagation of generalized seizure and myoclonus theologically, the therapy could not prevent the development and propagation of them entirely. Therefore, the use of prophylactic anticonvulsant should be needed. But, there is not randomized control study about the use of prophylactic anticonvulsant. We hypothesized that the use of prophylactic anticonvulsant to post cardiac arrest syndrome patients would decrease the rate of occurrence of generalized seizure and myoclonus and would improve the neurologic outcome. We planed that we used two anti-epileptic drugs - valproate, clonazepam - for the prophylactic anticonvulsant. The valproate and clonazepam are in general use for prevention and treatment of generalized seizure and myoclonus and are recommended to treat of generalized seizure and myoclonus to post cardiac arrest syndrome patients by 2008 guideline of ILCOR.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 7, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 10, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2012
CompletedJuly 25, 2011
July 1, 2011
2.8 years
March 7, 2010
July 21, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
electroencephalogram (EEG)
Seizure activity will be measured by EEG EEG will be interpreted by Nerologist
72hr after cardiac arrest
Secondary Outcomes (1)
CPC score (cerebral performance category) score
1month and 3 month after cardiac arrest
Study Arms (2)
Prophylactic group
EXPERIMENTALthe group that used prophylactic anticonvulsants (valproate, clonazepam)
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONcontrol group
Interventions
start at hypothermia induction valproate : 30mg/kg iv loading - 8hr after - 6mg/kg q 8hr iv till 72hr clonazepam : 1mg po bit via L-tube till 72 hr
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age : over 18, under 80
- Witnessed arrest
- Successful first resuscitation (ROSC should be last for 20 min.)
- Coma or Semicoma state
- Mean arterial pressure \> 60mmHg
- Peripheral Oxygen saturation \> 85%
- Expected life span before cardiac arrest \> 3 month.
- Performance scale before cardiac arrest \> 3 month.
You may not qualify if:
- Cause of arrest
- Sepsis, Progression of malignancy, Trauma, Hemorrhagic shock
- Known Coagulopathy
- Major operation within 7 days
- Previous seizure history
- current use of valproate or clonazepam
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, South Korea
Related Publications (1)
1. Willis, C.D., et al., Cardiopulmonary resuscitation after traumatic cardiac arrest is not always futile. Injury, 2006. 37(5): p. 448-54. 2. Eisenberg, M.S., et al., Cardiac arrest and resuscitation: a tale of 29 cities. Ann Emerg Med, 1990. 19(2): p. 179-86. 3. Edgren, E., et al., Assessment of neurological prognosis in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest. BRCT I Study Group. Lancet, 1994. 343(8905): p. 1055-9. 4. Nolan, J.P., et al., Post-cardiac arrest syndrome: epidemiology, pathophysiology, treatment, and prognostication.Resuscitation, 2008. 79(3): p. 350-79. 5. Neumar, R.W., et al., Post-cardiac arrest syndrome: epidemiology, pathophysiology, treatment, and prognostication. Circulation, 2008. 118(23): p. 2452-83. 6. Kuboyama, K., et al., Delay in cooling negates the beneficial effect of mild resuscitative cerebral hypothermia after cardiac arrest in dogs: a prospective, randomized study. Crit Care Med, 1993. 21(9): p. 1348-58. 7. Weinrauch, V., et al., Beneficial effect of mild hypothermia and detrimental effect of deep hypothermia after cardiac arrest in dogs. Stroke, 1992. 23(10): p. 1454-62. 8. Sterz, F., et al., Mild hypothermic cardiopulmonary resuscitation improves outcome after prolonged cardiac arrest in dogs. Crit Care Med, 1991. 19(3): p. 379-89. 9. Leonov, Y., et al., Mild cerebral hypothermia during and after cardiac arrest improves neurologic outcome in dogs. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 1990. 10(1): p. 57-70. 10. Bernard, S.A., et al., Treatment of comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with induced hypothermia. N Engl J Med, 2002. 346(8): p. 557-63.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Min Seob Sim, Master
Dept. of Emergency Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 7, 2010
First Posted
March 10, 2010
Study Start
March 1, 2010
Primary Completion
December 1, 2012
Last Updated
July 25, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-07