Study Stopped
Surgical practice evolution changed acceptable standard of care and lead to potential enrollment bias.
Repair of Challenging Abdominal Wall Defects: Strattice(TM) TM in Abdominal Wall Repair (StAR)
StAR
A Multicenter, Prospective, Single-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Study of the Repair of Challenging Abdominal Wall Defects: Strattice(TM) TM in Abdominal Wall Repair
1 other identifier
interventional
37
6 countries
29
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to compare the incidence of post-repair wound related complications, including hernia occurrence/recurrence, between challenging abdominal wall defects repaired with Strattice(TM) Reconstructive Tissue Matrix (TM) and those managed by standard repair. It is hypothesized that the use of Strattice(TM) TM to reinforce the repair will reduce the incidence of these post-repair complications.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Mar 2010
Typical duration for phase_4
29 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 8, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 9, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 19, 2013
CompletedNovember 19, 2013
September 1, 2013
2.3 years
March 8, 2010
September 18, 2013
September 18, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Hernia Occurrence
Hernia occurrence will be assessed by clinical evaluation. At Month 12 and at any time during the study if hernia occurrence is clinically suspected, a magnetic resonance image (MRI) will be obtained.
Month 12 after repair
Study Arms (2)
Strattice(TM) TM repair
ACTIVE COMPARATORStrattice(TM) TM will be placed in the intraperitoneal or retrorectus position to support the repair of abdominal wall defect
Standard of Care repair
ACTIVE COMPARATORAbdominal wall defect will be repaired using current standard of care techniques of either suture alone or suture with absorbable surgical mesh
Interventions
Strattice(TM) TM will be used to support the repair of abdominal wall defect
Abdominal wall defect will be repaired with suture alone or absorbable mesh with suture
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- adults (18years of age or older) who is able to provide written informed consent for study participation
- has need of surgical intervention for repair of (potentially) contaminated abdominal wall defect of \>3cm and \<22cm in length, where the viscera have not been exposed for more than 15 days in case of open abdomen(skin and fascia open).
- Is willing and able to return for all scheduled \& required study visit.
You may not qualify if:
- severe systemic sepsis
- frank pus in the wound, a fistula that will not be closed at the time of surgery or intra-abdominal abscess in surgical area,
- ongoing necrotizing pancreatitis,
- Is on chronic immunosuppressive therapy, or other medication that influences wound healing
- requires only short-term temporary closure,
- requires a synthetic, non-absorbable mesh to close the abdominal wall defect
- is unable to undergo general anesthesia,
- has other major organ system dysfunction or disorder that would jeopardize subject completing the 24 month study.
- Is unable to undergo an MRI scan
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- LifeCelllead
Study Sites (29)
CHU Amiens Hopital Nord
Amiens, France
Hopital de la Pitie-Salpetriere
Paris, France
CHU Robert Debre
Reims, France
Universitätsklinikum Aachen
Aachen, Germany
Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin
Berlin, Germany
St. Josef-Hospital
Bochum, Germany
Kliniken der Stadt Köln
Cologne, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf
Düsseldorf, Germany
Klinikum und Fachbereich Medizin der Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universitat
Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Giessen und Marburg GmbH
Giessen, Germany
Universitatsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Hamburg, Germany
Krankenhaus Agatharied GmbH
Hausham, Germany
Krankenhaus Salem der Evang. Stadtmission Heidelberg
Heidelberg, Germany
Universitatsklinikum Heidelberg
Heidelberg, Germany
Klinikum Konstanz
Konstanz, Germany
LMU Klinikum der Universität München
München, Germany
Technischen Universität München - Klinikum rechts der Isar
München, Germany
Lukaskrankenhaus
Neuss, Germany
Klinikum St Elisabeth Straubing GmbH
Straubing, Germany
St Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital
Bologna, Italy
Academisch Ziekenhuis Maastrict
Maastricht, Netherlands
Erasmus Medisch Centrum
Rotterdam, Netherlands
Haga Ziekenhuis
The Hague, Netherlands
Hospital Universitari del Mar
Barcelona, Spain
Sandwell General Hospital
Birmingham, United Kingdom
Raigmore Hospital
Inverness, United Kingdom
Manchester Royal Infirmary
Manchester, United Kingdom
Heart of England NHS Trust
Solihull, United Kingdom
Arrowe Park Hospital
Upton, Wirral, United Kingdom
Related Publications (5)
Van Geldere D. One hundred years of abdominal wound dehiscence and nothing has changed. Hernia 2000; 4:302-4.
BACKGROUNDvan't RM, De Vos Van Steenwijk PJ, Bonjer HJ, Steyerberg EW, Jeekel J. Incisional hernia after repair of wound dehiscence: incidence and risk factors. Am Surg. 2004 Apr;70(4):281-6.
PMID: 15098775BACKGROUNDMurugappan K, Gomes F, Waxman B. Abdominal wound dehiscence - who is really at risk? ANZ J Surg 2009; 79(S1):A25
BACKGROUNDGislason H, Viste A. Closure of burst abdomen after major gastrointestinal operations--comparison of different surgical techniques and later development of incisional hernia. Eur J Surg. 1999 Oct;165(10):958-61. doi: 10.1080/110241599750008071.
PMID: 10574104BACKGROUNDWebster C, Neumayer L, Smout R, Horn S, Daley J, Henderson W, Khuri S; National Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Prognostic models of abdominal wound dehiscence after laparotomy. J Surg Res. 2003 Feb;109(2):130-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-4804(02)00097-5.
PMID: 12643854BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Sandra VanGuldener
- Organization
- LifeCell
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Angus JM Watson
Raigmore Hospital, Inverness Scotland, National Health Service, UK
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Berndt Reith
Klinikum Konstanz, Konstanz Germany
- STUDY CHAIR
Johannes Jeekel
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 8, 2010
First Posted
March 9, 2010
Study Start
March 1, 2010
Primary Completion
June 1, 2012
Study Completion
June 1, 2012
Last Updated
November 19, 2013
Results First Posted
November 19, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-09