Randomised Controlled Trial of Needle Free Access Devices in Preventing Hemodialysis Blood Stream Infection
TEGO
A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Bacteraemia Rates in Closed Luer Lock Access Devices(TEGO) With Standard Devices in the Outpatient Haemodialysis Population
1 other identifier
interventional
106
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will be a randomised controlled trial examining whether a new type of needle free access device(TEGO) is associated with less episodes of infection of dialysis lines, when compared to the current gold standard. The investigators hypothesise that there will be less handling of the dialysis line by nursing staff and thus this will lead to lower rates of infection. The investigators will also assess whether these access devices lead to alterations in catheter blood flow rates when compared to the current gold standard.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Mar 2010
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 8, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 9, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2011
CompletedMarch 9, 2010
January 1, 2010
1 year
March 8, 2010
March 8, 2010
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Bacteraemia rates in the needle free access devices(TEGO) when compared to current practice
New needle free access devices will be compared to current 'bung' devices. Patients will be randomly assigned to both groups, and rates of bacteraemia will be compared between both groups
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Catheter blood flow rates in study device compared to control
1 year
Rates of line thrombosis in study group compared to control group
1 year
Study Arms (2)
TEGO
ACTIVE COMPARATORTEGO needle free access devices will be used in patients randomised to this arm
Control
PLACEBO COMPARATORPatients will continue to receive current standard of practice, ie a 'bung' cap at the end of the hemodialysis line
Interventions
A bung that can be attached to the end of dialysis lines that can be directly attached to the dialysis machine with minimal handling
Patients in this group will have a normal 'bung' placed at the end of their dialysis line, which will need to be removed by nursing staff prior to initiation of dialysis
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients recruited will be over 18 and have been on haemodialysis for greater than one month, have permanent cuffed vascular access lines in place and will be receiving haemodialysis through these lines three times per week.
- Patients will not have had a documented episode of bacteraemia or sepsis for greater than 4 weeks, and will not be using antibiotic coated dialysis lines.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with immunosuppressive illnesses such as HIV, cancer or patients who regularly use glucocorticoids.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Beaumont Hospital
Dublin, Dublin, 9, Ireland
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Peter Conlon, MD
Beaumont Hospital Dublin
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 8, 2010
First Posted
March 9, 2010
Study Start
March 1, 2010
Primary Completion
March 1, 2011
Study Completion
March 1, 2011
Last Updated
March 9, 2010
Record last verified: 2010-01