Non-invasive Assessments of Central Venous Pressure

NCT01079611 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: CVP1
• Study Type: observational
• Target: 81
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

Background: Estimates of central venous pressure (CVP) can be very helpful in guiding fluid therapy in the intensive care unit, operating room or emergency room. Current standard technique for CVP assessment is invasive, requiring insertion of a catheter into a subclavian, internal jugular or peripheral vein. Several ultrasound based and clinical methods have been described as potential non-invasive alternatives to assess CVP. Aim: To prospectively evaluate the accuracy of CVP assessment by a) inferior vena cava diameter and collapsibility b) internal jugular vein diameter c) compression sonography of a forearm vein and d) clinical assessment of peripheral vein collapse in comparison to invasive CVP measurement. Study design: single center, prospective observational study Patients and Methods: We will examine 77 consecutive patients with invasive venous access and invasive hemodynamic monitoring at the surgical intensive care unit (ICU). After obtaining informed consent, ultrasound examinations of the inferior vena cava, internal jugular vein and compression sonography of a forearm vein as well as clinical evaluation of peripheral vein collapsibility will be performed in a random sequence by different experienced examiner. Invasive CVP is recorded simultaneously to each measurement. Examiners are blinded to clinical parameters and results of previous CVP measurements. Primary endpoint: Accuracy of each non-invasive method to determine CVP defined by invasively measured CVP. Secondary endpoint: Comparison of the feasibility of each non-invasive method. Expected results: We hypothesize that sonographic measurement of inferior vena cava diameter, internal jugular vein diameter and compression sonography of a forearm vein as well as clinical assessment of peripheral vein collapsibility are reliable methods for CVP determination in comparison to invasive CVP measurement. Significance: The validation and comparison of sonographic / clinic CVP assessment would enable clinicians to choose an accurate non-invasive method to assess volume status which is an important adjunct in the management of many critically ill patients. The non-invasiveness of these methods broadens the feasibility to measure CVP and may guide fluid therapy in new patient populations.

Conditions

Venous Pressure, Central; Ultrasonic Diagnosis

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years+
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
• Sampling Method: Probability Sample

Study Population

This single center, prospective observational study will be performed at the surgical intensive care unit (ICU) of the tertiary care teaching hospital of the University of Basel. ICU, rather than Emergency Department patients will be consecutively enrolled because of the higher prevalence of CVP catheters and the higher likelihood of clinical stability (by means of hemodynamic parameters, therapeutic interventions etc.).

You may qualify if:

• Patients age greater than 18 years are study candidates if they need central venous access and invasive hemodynamic monitoring, according to the discretion of the treating physician.
• Informed consent is given.

You may not qualify if:

• Patients are ineligible if they have a history of neck or body radiotherapy and/or previous or active upper-extremity deep venous thrombosis.
• Informed consent is not given.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland: lead

Study Sites (1)

University Hospital Basel

Basel, 4031, Switzerland

Location

Related Publications (1)

• Uthoff H, Siegemund M, Aschwanden M, Hunziker L, Fabbro T, Baumann U, Jaeger KA, Imfeld S, Staub D. Prospective comparison of noninvasive, bedside ultrasound methods for assessing central venous pressure. Ultraschall Med. 2012 Dec;33(7):E256-E262. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1299506. Epub 2012 Jun 1.

  PMID: 22660962 RESULT

Study Officials

• Heiko Uthoff, M.D.

  University Hospital Basel, Angiology

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

• Kurt A Jaeger, M.D.

  University Hospital Basel, Angiology

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

• Study Type: observational
• Observational Model: COHORT
• Time Perspective: PROSPECTIVE
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: March 2, 2010
• First Posted: March 3, 2010
• Study Start: May 1, 2010
• Primary Completion: December 1, 2010
• Study Completion: November 1, 2011
• Last Updated: June 20, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-06

Locations

CH (1)