Study Stopped
Internal
Value of Functional Anesthetic and Provocative Discography in the Surgical Treatment of Discogenic Pain
Comparing the Value of Functional Anesthetic and Provocative Discography in the Surgical Treatment of Discogenic Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Although discography and spinal imaging techniques, either alone or in combination, are commonly used to diagnose discogenic pain, their exact role in predicting surgical results are poorly defined. Our aim in this study is to compare the ability of Functional anesthetic discography (FAD), and Provocative Discography (PD) to diagnose discogenic pain and to correctly identify the disc levels for the surgical treatment. Proper identification for disc levels should improve the overall results of surgery for this condition. Patients with discogenic pain have better outcomes if the disc levels for the fusion surgery are identified by using FAD compared to similar disc level identification by PD.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Feb 2010
Longer than P75 for phase_4
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 26, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2014
CompletedSeptember 13, 2016
September 1, 2016
4 years
February 26, 2010
September 9, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain
Numerical Rating Scale (11-point numerical rating, 0-10, scale of pain intensity) Standard Morphine Equivalent intake
One Year
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Physical functioning
One Year
Quality of Life
One Year
Patient Satisfaction
One Year
Study Arms (2)
Functional anesthetic discography
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe patients disc levels for surgical treatment will be based exclusively on their Functional anesthetic discography results. The discography will be performed at a maximum of two disc levels. Discs showing the following MRI findings will be considered for discography: 1. Loss of disc signal intensity on T-2 weighted sagittal MR images. 2. Loss of disc height on sagittal MR images. Patients will be followed-up at 3 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year after the surgery by research personnel. Patients will be asked to complete questionnaires before their discography and at every follow-up visit.
Provocative Discography
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe patients disc levels for surgical treatment will be based exclusively on their Provocative Discography results. The discography will be performed at a maximum of two disc levels. Discs showing the following MRI findings will be considered for discography: 1. Loss of disc signal intensity on T-2 weighted sagittal MR images. 2. Loss of disc height on sagittal MR images. The control disc, in the case provocative discography group must appear normal on the MRI - must have preserved disc height and central disc signal intensity on T-2 weighted images. The provocative discography will be performed using the standard IASP criteria. The patients will be followed-up at 3 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year after the surgery.
Interventions
Functional anesthetic discography will be performed to diagnose discogenic pain and to correctly identify the disc levels for the surgical treatment. Proper identification for disc levels should improve the overall results of surgery for this condition.
Provocative Discography will be performed to diagnose discogenic pain and to correctly identify the disc levels for the surgical treatment. Proper identification for disc levels should improve the overall results of surgery for this condition.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age between 21 to 65 years.
- Symptoms of at least 6 months duration.
- Primarily axial low back pain.
- At least 6 months of conservative treatment, including, physical therapy, injections, chiropractic etc.
- Patients with overall pain scores of greater than 6/10 (NRS).
- Recent (within the past 6 months) lumbar spine MRI showing: disc desiccation and loss of disc height of at least one disc level.
You may not qualify if:
- History of previous spine surgery.
- MRI changes at more than two disc levels on the recent (within the past 6 months) lumbar spine MRI.
- Clinical or radiological evidence of significant:
- Disc herniation
- Spinal Stenosis
- Spinal Deformity
- Spondylolisthesis
- Spinal instability or pars-defect
- Facet Syndrome
- Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction
- Myofascial Pain Syndrome
- Fibromyalgia
- Current issues of:
- Litigation
- Disability
- +3 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Northwestern Universitylead
- Medtronic Spine LLCcollaborator
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Khalid Malik, M.D.
Department of Anesthesiology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 26, 2010
First Posted
March 1, 2010
Study Start
February 1, 2010
Primary Completion
February 1, 2014
Study Completion
February 1, 2014
Last Updated
September 13, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-09