NCT01077947

Brief Summary

Although discography and spinal imaging techniques, either alone or in combination, are commonly used to diagnose discogenic pain, their exact role in predicting surgical results are poorly defined. Our aim in this study is to compare the ability of Functional anesthetic discography (FAD), and Provocative Discography (PD) to diagnose discogenic pain and to correctly identify the disc levels for the surgical treatment. Proper identification for disc levels should improve the overall results of surgery for this condition. Patients with discogenic pain have better outcomes if the disc levels for the fusion surgery are identified by using FAD compared to similar disc level identification by PD.

Trial Health

15
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2010

Longer than P75 for phase_4

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2010

Completed
25 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 26, 2010

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 1, 2010

Completed
3.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

September 13, 2016

Status Verified

September 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

4 years

First QC Date

February 26, 2010

Last Update Submit

September 9, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

low back painspinal fusionPrimarily axial low back pain

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Pain

    Numerical Rating Scale (11-point numerical rating, 0-10, scale of pain intensity) Standard Morphine Equivalent intake

    One Year

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Physical functioning

    One Year

  • Quality of Life

    One Year

  • Patient Satisfaction

    One Year

Study Arms (2)

Functional anesthetic discography

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The patients disc levels for surgical treatment will be based exclusively on their Functional anesthetic discography results. The discography will be performed at a maximum of two disc levels. Discs showing the following MRI findings will be considered for discography: 1. Loss of disc signal intensity on T-2 weighted sagittal MR images. 2. Loss of disc height on sagittal MR images. Patients will be followed-up at 3 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year after the surgery by research personnel. Patients will be asked to complete questionnaires before their discography and at every follow-up visit.

Procedure: Functional anesthetic discography

Provocative Discography

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The patients disc levels for surgical treatment will be based exclusively on their Provocative Discography results. The discography will be performed at a maximum of two disc levels. Discs showing the following MRI findings will be considered for discography: 1. Loss of disc signal intensity on T-2 weighted sagittal MR images. 2. Loss of disc height on sagittal MR images. The control disc, in the case provocative discography group must appear normal on the MRI - must have preserved disc height and central disc signal intensity on T-2 weighted images. The provocative discography will be performed using the standard IASP criteria. The patients will be followed-up at 3 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year after the surgery.

Procedure: Provocative Discography

Interventions

Functional anesthetic discography will be performed to diagnose discogenic pain and to correctly identify the disc levels for the surgical treatment. Proper identification for disc levels should improve the overall results of surgery for this condition.

Functional anesthetic discography

Provocative Discography will be performed to diagnose discogenic pain and to correctly identify the disc levels for the surgical treatment. Proper identification for disc levels should improve the overall results of surgery for this condition.

Provocative Discography

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age between 21 to 65 years.
  • Symptoms of at least 6 months duration.
  • Primarily axial low back pain.
  • At least 6 months of conservative treatment, including, physical therapy, injections, chiropractic etc.
  • Patients with overall pain scores of greater than 6/10 (NRS).
  • Recent (within the past 6 months) lumbar spine MRI showing: disc desiccation and loss of disc height of at least one disc level.

You may not qualify if:

  • History of previous spine surgery.
  • MRI changes at more than two disc levels on the recent (within the past 6 months) lumbar spine MRI.
  • Clinical or radiological evidence of significant:
  • Disc herniation
  • Spinal Stenosis
  • Spinal Deformity
  • Spondylolisthesis
  • Spinal instability or pars-defect
  • Facet Syndrome
  • Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction
  • Myofascial Pain Syndrome
  • Fibromyalgia
  • Current issues of:
  • Litigation
  • Disability
  • +3 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Back PainPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Khalid Malik, M.D.

    Department of Anesthesiology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 26, 2010

First Posted

March 1, 2010

Study Start

February 1, 2010

Primary Completion

February 1, 2014

Study Completion

February 1, 2014

Last Updated

September 13, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-09