Phase II Subthalamic Nucleus (STN) vs. Globus Pallidus (GPi) Trial
CSP #468 Phase II - A Comparison of Best Medical Therapy and Deep Brain Stimulation of Subthalamic Nucleus and Globus Pallidus for the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease, Phase II
2 other identifiers
interventional
299
1 country
14
Brief Summary
The goal of the second phase of the study is to determine if simultaneous bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation or simultaneous bilateral globus pallidus stimulation is more effective in reducing symptoms of Parkinson's Disease.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Apr 2002
Longer than P75 for phase_3
14 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2002
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 24, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 26, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 15, 2014
CompletedJuly 14, 2014
June 1, 2014
6.5 years
February 24, 2010
September 11, 2013
June 27, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The Change From Baseline in the UPDRS-III Score at 24 Months With Deep-brain Stimulation and Without Medication.
The primary outcome measure for the comparison of GPi deep brain stimulation (DBS) to STN DBS is the motor function score of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS Part III) measured while the patient is off medications and on stimulation at follow-up visits post surgery. UPDRS Part III has 14 items assessing motor skills including facial expression and speech, tremors, rigidity, posture, gait, and bradykinesia. Left and right sides (arms, legs, and hands) are assessed separately for seven of the functions. The motor function (UPDRS part III) assessments are done by turning on the stimulation with and without taking PD medications (on/off) at each in-person visit. A summary score ranging from 0 to 108 is generated by adding the 14 specific motor function responses. The higher score indicates the worse motor function.
Baseline and 24 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
The Change From Baseline in the UPDRS Scores Part I (Mentation) at 24 Months.
Baseline and 24 months
The Change From Baseline in the UPDRS Scores Part II (Activity of Daily Living) at 24 Months.
Baseline and 24 months
The Change From Baseline in the UPDRS Scores Part IV (Complication of Therapy) at 24 Months.
Baseline and 24 months
Study Arms (2)
STN
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants were randomized to receive deep brain stimulation on STN (Subthalamic Nucleus) target.
GPi
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants were randomized to receive deep brain stimulation on GPi (Globus Pallidus) target.
Interventions
The DBS site (STN or GPi) was assigned on a random basis at the time the patient enters the surgical phase of the trial.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- idiopathic Parkinson's Disease
- Hoehn and Yahr stage 2 or worse when off medications
- L-dopa responsive with clearly defined "on" periods (i.e. symptoms improve at least partially with L-dopa administration, a characteristic that helps distinguish idiopathic PD from "Parkinson's Plus" and atypical Parkinson's syndromes-see below)
- persistent disabling symptoms (e.g. on troubling dyskinesias, or disabling "off" periods at least 3 hours/day) despite medication therapy. Patients will have been treated with variable doses of levodopa and dopamine agonists (at a minimum) and will have had an adequate trial of other adjunctive medications)
- stable on medical therapy for at least one month prior to study enrollment
- age \>21
- available and willing to be followed-up according to study protocol
You may not qualify if:
- "Parkinson's plus" syndromes, secondary, or atypical Parkinson's syndromes (e.g. progressive supranuclear palsy, striato-nigral degeneration, multiple system atrophy, post-stroke, post-traumatic, or post-encephalitic Parkinson's. These patients have cardinal symptoms characteristic of PD but with additional symptoms indicating other organic brain dysfunction, such as gaze palsies, autonomic dysfunction, lack of response to L-dopa, these individuals tend not to improve with standard treatments for PD)
- previous Parkinson's Disease surgery
- medical contraindications to surgery or stimulation (e.g. uncontrolled hypertension, advanced coronary artery disease, other implanted stimulation or electronically-controlled devices including cardiac demand pacemaker, aneurysm clips, cochlear implants, or a spinal cord stimulator) (Note: for the subject who receives either a pacemaker and/or defibrillator after this study enrollment, he/she will be allowed to continue the study if the neurostimulator system can be adequately programmed to permit system compatibility)
- contraindication to magnetic resonance imaging (e.g. indwelling metal fragments or implants that might be affected by MRI)
- active alcohol or drug abuse
- score on Mini-Mental Status examination of 24 or lower, or other neuropsychological dysfunction 9e.g. dementia) that would contraindicate surgery
- intracranial abnormalities that would contraindicate surgery (e.g. stroke, tumor, vascular abnormality affecting the target area)
- pregnancy
- concurrent participation in another research protocol
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- US Department of Veterans Affairslead
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)collaborator
- Medtroniccollaborator
Study Sites (14)
University of California at Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, 90073, United States
University of California at San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94121, United States
VA Medical Center, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94121, United States
VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, West LA
West Los Angeles, California, 90073, United States
VA Medical Center, Iowa City
Iowa City, Iowa, 52246-2208, United States
VA Medical Center, Portland
Portland, Oregon, 97201, United States
Oregon Health Sciences University
Portland, Oregon, 97207, United States
University of Pennsylvania Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
Philadelphia, OPC
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19106, United States
Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center (152)
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center
Richmond, Virginia, 23249, United States
Medical College of Virginia
Richmond, Virginia, 23249, United States
VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle
Seattle, Washington, 98108, United States
Related Publications (6)
Weaver FM, Follett K, Stern M, Hur K, Harris C, Marks WJ Jr, Rothlind J, Sagher O, Reda D, Moy CS, Pahwa R, Burchiel K, Hogarth P, Lai EC, Duda JE, Holloway K, Samii A, Horn S, Bronstein J, Stoner G, Heemskerk J, Huang GD; CSP 468 Study Group. Bilateral deep brain stimulation vs best medical therapy for patients with advanced Parkinson disease: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2009 Jan 7;301(1):63-73. doi: 10.1001/jama.2008.929.
PMID: 19126811RESULTFollett KA, Weaver FM, Stern M, Hur K, Harris CL, Luo P, Marks WJ Jr, Rothlind J, Sagher O, Moy C, Pahwa R, Burchiel K, Hogarth P, Lai EC, Duda JE, Holloway K, Samii A, Horn S, Bronstein JM, Stoner G, Starr PA, Simpson R, Baltuch G, De Salles A, Huang GD, Reda DJ; CSP 468 Study Group. Pallidal versus subthalamic deep-brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jun 3;362(22):2077-91. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907083.
PMID: 20519680RESULTWeaver FM, Follett KA, Stern M, Luo P, Harris CL, Hur K, Marks WJ Jr, Rothlind J, Sagher O, Moy C, Pahwa R, Burchiel K, Hogarth P, Lai EC, Duda JE, Holloway K, Samii A, Horn S, Bronstein JM, Stoner G, Starr PA, Simpson R, Baltuch G, De Salles A, Huang GD, Reda DJ; CSP 468 Study Group. Randomized trial of deep brain stimulation for Parkinson disease: thirty-six-month outcomes. Neurology. 2012 Jul 3;79(1):55-65. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31825dcdc1. Epub 2012 Jun 20.
PMID: 22722632RESULTWeintraub D, Duda JE, Carlson K, Luo P, Sagher O, Stern M, Follett KA, Reda D, Weaver FM; CSP 468 Study Group. Suicide ideation and behaviours after STN and GPi DBS surgery for Parkinson's disease: results from a randomised, controlled trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013 Oct;84(10):1113-8. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2012-304396. Epub 2013 May 10.
PMID: 23667214RESULTOstrem JL, Luo P, Weaver FM, Follett K, Rothlind J, Galifianakis NB, Lai EC, Bronstein J, Duda J, Holloway K, Sarwar A, Brodsky M, Chung K, Spindler M, Reda D, Snodgrass A, Moy C, Huang G, Wei Y, Marks WJ Jr; CSP 468F Study Group. 10-year clinical outcomes of subthalamic nucleus versus pallidal deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease: VA/NINDS CSP #468F. Front Neurol. 2026 Jan 16;16:1728999. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1728999. eCollection 2025.
PMID: 41626017DERIVEDRothlind JC, York MK, Carlson K, Luo P, Marks WJ Jr, Weaver FM, Stern M, Follett K, Reda D; CSP-468 Study Group. Neuropsychological changes following deep brain stimulation surgery for Parkinson's disease: comparisons of treatment at pallidal and subthalamic targets versus best medical therapy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2015 Jun;86(6):622-9. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2014-308119. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
PMID: 25185211DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
We observed differences between STN and GPi DBS groups on several secondary measures but these findings should be interpreted cautiously. We did not adjust for repeated significance tests and the differences may have limited clinical significance.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Frances M. Weaver, Ph.D
- Organization
- Hines Veterans Affairs Hospital Center for Management of Complex Chronic Care
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Kenneth Follett
VA Medical Center, Iowa City
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- GT60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- FED
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 24, 2010
First Posted
February 26, 2010
Study Start
April 1, 2002
Primary Completion
October 1, 2008
Study Completion
April 1, 2009
Last Updated
July 14, 2014
Results First Posted
January 15, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-06