NCT01076205

Brief Summary

The AGIL study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of adalimumab over 5 years in routine daily clinical practice in Germany, with a focus on the impact of therapy on employment-related outcomes.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
7,229

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2009

Longer than P75 for all trials

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 12, 2009

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 24, 2010

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 26, 2010

Completed
7.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 14, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 14, 2017

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

February 7, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

February 7, 2019

Status Verified

August 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

8.7 years

First QC Date

February 24, 2010

Results QC Date

September 10, 2018

Last Update Submit

September 10, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

Work ProductivityLong-term ObservationHumiraQuality of LifeRheumatoid Arthritis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (15)

  • Change From Baseline in Number of Missed Working Days Due to Sick Leave in the Past 6 Months

    Primary effectiveness outcomes related to employment were performed in patients who were employed part- or full-time at baseline. Sick leave days were based on patient recall.

    Baseline and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months

  • Percentage of Participants With > 5 Missed Working Days Due to Sick Leave in the Past 6 Months

    Primary effectiveness outcomes related to employment were performed in patients who were employed part- or full-time at baseline. Sick leave days were based on patient recall.

    Baseline, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months

  • Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Absenteeism

    The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire for general health is a validated tool in RA consisting of 6 questions, based on patient recall of the previous 7 days. WPAI assesses work time missed due to illness (absenteeism), impairment at work due to health (presenteeism), total work productivity impairment due to health (an aggregate measure of both absenteeism and presenteeism), and total non-occupational activity impairment due to health. WPAI scores are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.

    Baseline and 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months

  • Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Presenteeism

    The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire for general health is a validated tool in RA consisting of 6 questions, based on patient recall of the previous 7 days. WPAI assesses work time missed due to illness (absenteeism), impairment at work due to health (presenteeism), total work productivity impairment due to health (an aggregate measure of both absenteeism and presenteeism), and total non-occupational activity impairment due to health. WPAI scores are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.

    Baseline and 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months

  • Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Total Work Productivity Impairment

    The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire for general health is a validated tool in RA consisting of 6 questions, based on patient recall of the previous 7 days. WPAI assesses work time missed due to illness (absenteeism), impairment at work due to health (presenteeism), total work productivity impairment due to health (an aggregate measure of both absenteeism and presenteeism), and total non-occupational activity impairment due to health. WPAI scores are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.

    Baseline and 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months

  • Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Total Activity Impairment

    The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire for general health is a validated tool in RA consisting of 6 questions, based on patient recall of the previous 7 days. WPAI assesses work time missed due to illness (absenteeism), impairment at work due to health (presenteeism), total work productivity impairment due to health (an aggregate measure of both absenteeism and presenteeism), and total non-occupational activity impairment due to health. WPAI scores are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.

    Baseline and 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months

  • Change From Baseline in Work Activity Index (WAI)

    The WAI is a tool designed to record the work ability of employees and consists of 7 questions. The modified WAI used in this study included Questions 1, 2, 4, 6, and 7 of the WAI. Question 3, which involves the number of current diseases diagnosed by a physician, was omitted because this parameter was unlikely to reflect change due to treatment. Question 5 (sick leave during the past year) was replaced with the previous question concerning sick leave days.WAI scores range from 7 (worst) to 49 (best).

    Baseline and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months

  • Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score - 28 Joints (DAS28)

    The DAS28 is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and the patient's assessment of global disease activity are included in the DAS28 score. Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to 10. A DAS28 score \> 5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score \< 3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score \< 2.6 indicates clinical remission.

    Baseline and 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months

  • Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count

    Twenty-eight joints were assessed and classified as tender/not tender by pressure and joint manipulation on physical examination.

    Baseline and 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months

  • Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count

    Twenty-eight joints were assessed and classified as swollen/not swollen by pressure and joint manipulation on physical examination.

    Baseline and 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months

  • Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate

    Baseline and 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months

  • Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein

    Baseline and 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months

  • Change From Baseline in Health-Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI)

    The HAQ-DI is a patient-reported assessment of physical function that includes 20 items in eight categories representing a comprehensive set of functional activities, including dressing, eating, walking, and hygiene. Patients are asked about their ability to complete these tasks in the past week using the following categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 (best) to 3 (worst), with a higher score representing a high-dependency disability.

    Baseline and 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months

  • EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Scores

    The EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) is a generic instrument for measuring health-related quality of life. The patient questionnaire consists of two parts. The first part includes statements for the following five areas (dimensions): * agility/mobility * self-care * usual activities * pain, bodily discomfort * anxiety, depression For each dimension the patient is asked for a three-level assessment of their health on the current day: "no problems" (1), "some problems" (2), "extreme problems" (3).

    Baseline and 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months

  • Change From Baseline in Euroqol Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D): The EQ-5D is a generic instrument for measuring health-related quality of life. The patient questionnaire consists of two parts. The second part is a vertical, thermometer-like, VAS ranging from 0 to 100 that provides a patient-reported assessment of overall health. Patients are asked to mark how good or bad their health is on that day, with 100 meaning "the best health you can imagine" and 0 meaning "the worst health you can imagine."

    Baseline and 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Number of Physician Visits in Past 6 Months

    Baseline, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months

  • Number of Inpatient Hospitalizations in Past 6 Months

    Baseline, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months

  • Duration of Inpatient Hospitalizations in Past 6 Months

    Baseline, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months

  • Number of Days With Impairment of Non-Occupational Activities in Past 6 Months

    Baseline, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months

  • Duration of Morning Stiffness

    Baseline and 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Adalimumab

Adults with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who initiated adalimumab therapy during routine clinical care.

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 99 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Community sample: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis

You may qualify if:

  • Moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis in adults with insufficient response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs
  • Inclusive methotrexate
  • Moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis in adults who have not been treated with methotrexate before; In case of incompatibility with methotrexate, Humira can be used as monotherapy.

You may not qualify if:

  • Hypersensitivity against the drug or one of the other ingredients
  • Active tuberculosis or other severe infections (e.g. sepsis and opportunistic infections)
  • Moderate to severe cardiac insufficiency

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (2)

  • Behrens F, Tony HP, Koehm M, Schwaneck EC, Gnann H, Greger G, Burkhardt H, Schmalzing M. Sustained improvement in work outcomes in employed patients with rheumatoid arthritis during 2 years of adalimumab therapy: an observational cohort study. Clin Rheumatol. 2020 Sep;39(9):2583-2592. doi: 10.1007/s10067-020-05038-y. Epub 2020 Mar 23.

  • Behrens F, Koehm M, Schwaneck EC, Schmalzing M, Gnann H, Greger G, Tony HP, Burkhardt H. Use of a "critical difference" statistical criterion improves the predictive utility of the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index score in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. BMC Rheumatol. 2019 Dec 10;3:51. doi: 10.1186/s41927-019-0095-2. eCollection 2019.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Arthritis, Rheumatoid

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic DiseasesConnective Tissue DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue DiseasesAutoimmune DiseasesImmune System Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Global Medical Services
Organization
AbbVie (prior sponsor Abbott)

Study Officials

  • Henning Kleine, PhD

    AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Medical Department

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 24, 2010

First Posted

February 26, 2010

Study Start

January 12, 2009

Primary Completion

September 14, 2017

Study Completion

September 14, 2017

Last Updated

February 7, 2019

Results First Posted

February 7, 2019

Record last verified: 2018-08