Comparison of a New Patient Warming System Using a Polymer Conductive Warming Under-body and Upper-body Blanket With Forced Air Warming
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Intraoperative active warming is usually performed by skin warming. There are several forced-air systems on the market; forced air warming is generally described as the most effective yet feasible method of patient warming. Augustine Biomedical (Eden Prairie, MN, USA) recently introduced a new patient warming system named "Hot Dog" with an active polymer warming upper-body blanket and a new under-body warming mattress. The polymer-heating devices consist of an electronic regulator and the polymer blankets, which are covered with a washable fabric. Conventional mains power the system. The manufacturer claims, that the new system "Hot Dog" (with combination of under body and upper body warming) is as effective as forced air warming, while not having any disadvantages of the forced air system, like: airborne infection, noise, high power consumption and hard-to-clean hose. The investigators will compare the new Hot Dog patient warming device combination (under body + upper body) with the established warming system, which blows warm air via a mattress over the body of the patients).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Jan 2010
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 25, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 25, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2010
CompletedJanuary 15, 2015
January 1, 2015
6 months
January 25, 2010
January 14, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Core Temperature at the end of surgery (at time of skin suture)
Single Measurement at Beginning of Skin Suture
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Core temperature increase (°C/time)
From Beginning until End of Surgery
Study Arms (2)
Forced air
ACTIVE COMPARATORForced Air Warming
Resistive HotDog Warming
EXPERIMENTALWarming by resistive Warming
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The investigators will study 40 patients (18-90 years) undergoing elective orthopedic lower limb surgery at the trauma surgery unit. The patients must have normal weight (20-30 BMI), the duration of surgery should last between 2 - 3 hours.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Oliver Kimberger
Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assoc.Prof.PD Dr. MSc
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 25, 2010
First Posted
February 25, 2010
Study Start
January 1, 2010
Primary Completion
July 1, 2010
Study Completion
July 1, 2010
Last Updated
January 15, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-01