NCT01074255

Brief Summary

This survey is conducted for preparing application materials for re-examination under the Pharmaceutical Affairs Laws and its Enforcement Regulation. Its aim is to reconfirm the clinical usefulness of EMEMD (aprepitant) through collecting the safety information according to the Re-examination Regulation for New Drugs.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
3,546

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2007

Longer than P75 for all trials

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2007

Completed
2.9 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 22, 2010

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 24, 2010

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2011

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2011

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

October 5, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

April 21, 2015

Status Verified

April 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

4.5 years

First QC Date

February 22, 2010

Results QC Date

August 31, 2012

Last Update Submit

April 2, 2015

Conditions

Keywords

NauseaVomitingChemotherapyPost-chemotherapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Investigator Global Assessment of Participants' Response to Therapy With EMEND (Aprepitant) for the Prevention of Acute and Delayed Nausea Following Chemotherapy

    The investigators assessed a participant's response to therapy with EMEND to prevent acute and delayed nausea and vomiting associated with initial and repeat courses of chemotherapy when used concomitantly with other antiemetics. The response categories were: excellent (best possible anticipated response, considering the severity and stage of disease), good (good response, but less than the best possible anticipated response), fair (definite response, but could be better), poor (minimal response, unacceptable), or none (no response, absence of drug effect).

    Up to 14 days following the cessation of treatment

Study Arms (1)

Korean Participants Treated With EMEND (aprepitant)

Participants receiving EMEND on Treatment Days 1, 2, and 3 concomitantly with a corticosteroid and a 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 (5-HT3) antagonist.

Drug: EMEND

Interventions

EMENDDRUG

EMEND (Aprepitant,125 mg oral capsules) is administered 1 hour prior to chemotherapy on treatment Day 1. EMEND (80 mg) is administered on the morning of Days 2 and 3. EMEND is concomitantly administered with a regimen of a corticosteroid and a 5-HT3 antagonist.

Also known as: Aprepitant, MK-0869
Korean Participants Treated With EMEND (aprepitant)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Korean patients treated with EMEND in usual practice.

You may qualify if:

  • Participants who are treated with EMEND for the first time as per the EMEND label

You may not qualify if:

  • Contraindication to EMEND

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

VomitingNausea

Interventions

Aprepitant

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Signs and Symptoms, DigestiveSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

MorpholinesOxazinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic Compounds

Results Point of Contact

Title
Senior Vice President, Global Clinical Development
Organization
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.

Study Officials

  • Medical Monitor

    Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 22, 2010

First Posted

February 24, 2010

Study Start

April 1, 2007

Primary Completion

October 1, 2011

Study Completion

October 1, 2011

Last Updated

April 21, 2015

Results First Posted

October 5, 2012

Record last verified: 2015-04