The Effectiveness of Selective Nerve Root Injections in Preventing the Need for Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
54
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The median Orthopaedic surgery wait time in Canada is 36.7 weeks (Esmail 2008), thus there is a need to find alternative treatments for pathologies such as lumbar disc herniations (LDH). The literature has demonstrated that selective nerve root injections (SNRI) are able to alleviate sciatic symptoms caused by LDH (Riew 2006) and may be beneficial as an alternative to surgery. It is necessary to determine whether SNRIs provide significant symptom resolution alleviating the need for surgery, or to determine if their success is transient and delays the time to surgery. The purpose of the proposed study is to evaluate the success of SNRI in patients suffering with LDH and to determine which factors influence outcome. Over the span of 2 years, data from 100 patients will be collected. These patients will be surgical candidates and have exhausted all non-operative measures prior to receiving a SNRI. Upon first assessment, each eligible patient will be randomly assigned to the treatment (steroid) or control (saline) group. The patient and all treating physicians will be blinded to the treatment given. Each patient will be followed over their course of treatment and information pertaining to their pain and symptoms will be recorded using standard questionnaires. Patient demographics, diagnosis, Worker's Compensation status, spinal levels treatment/outcome, and time from referral to treatment will also be evaluated. The primary outcome measure will be defined as the avoidance of surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Mar 2010
Longer than P75 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 22, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 24, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2015
CompletedSeptember 29, 2016
September 1, 2016
5.7 years
February 22, 2010
September 28, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Surgical Avoidance
After a minimum 1 year follow-up of an SNRI, a statistical analysis will be conducted to determine group differences in surgical necessity
5 years
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Subjective questionnaires
5 Years
Study Arms (2)
Kenalog and Sensorcaine
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe following drugs will be administered during a one time injection of the appropriate spinal level based off clinical and radiographic information: Intervention: Kenalog 40 mg/ml and Sensorcaine 0.25% 1cc
Saline
PLACEBO COMPARATORSaline injections will be used to mimic the Steroid dose
Interventions
Kenalog: 40 mg/ml Sensorcaine 0.25%: 1cc
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age: 18-65
- Diagnosed with lower extremity radiculopathy (sciatica) secondary to a lumbar disc herniation
- Exhausted non-operative measures:
- Medication has not been helpful in treating the patient's pain/symptoms
- Modification of daily activities has not been helpful in treating the patient's pain/symptoms
- Physiotherapy has not been helpful in treating the patient's pain/symptoms.
- Patient of the Investigator
- Patient willing to proceed with surgical intervention
You may not qualify if:
- Age: \< 18 or \> 65
- Any patient who has not attempted conservative non-operative treatment for a minimum of 6 weeks
- Any patient who has not been deemed a surgical candidate
- Any patient who has a contraindication for surgery
- Any patient who has a contraindication for Kenalog or Sensorcaine
- Known sensitivity to medicinal or non-medicinal ingredients
- Systemic infection
- Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura
- Cerebrospinal diseases
- Pregnancy and nursing mothers
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Saint John Regional Hospital
Saint John, New Brunswick, E2L 4L2, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Neil A Manson, MD
Canada East Spine Centre
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Erin E Bigney, MA
Canada East Spine Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Orthopaedic surgeon
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 22, 2010
First Posted
February 24, 2010
Study Start
March 1, 2010
Primary Completion
November 1, 2015
Study Completion
November 1, 2015
Last Updated
September 29, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
Manuscript preparation in progress