Actions Elicited by In-hospital Follow-up of Cardiac Devices
ATHENS
Action Elicited By Scheduled In-Hospital Follow-Up of Cardiac Devices
1 other identifier
observational
3,362
1 country
8
Brief Summary
This study will enroll all patients who will attend an in-hospital follow-up of cardiac device since February 22nd 2010 to June 21st 2010. Primary objective of the study is to observe how many of patients seen during these period (approximately 5000) will receive a change in cardiac device programming or in drug therapy or a scheduled or urgent hospital admission. These data should help to clarify how useful and safe is a remote monitoring strategy for this kind of patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Feb 2010
Shorter than P25 for all trials
8 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 22, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 23, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 28, 2011
CompletedFebruary 28, 2011
January 1, 2011
11 months
February 22, 2010
January 10, 2011
February 2, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Patients of the Whole Population in Whom Something (Therapy, Device Programming ...) Has Been Changed During In-hospital Follow-up
4 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Number of Patients -Amongst Those Implanted With a Pacemaker - in Whom Something (Therapy, Device Programming ...) Has Been Changed During In-hospital Follow-up
4 months
Number of Patients - Amongst Those Implanted With an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD)- in Whom Something (Therapy, Device Programming ...) Has Been Changed During In-hospital Follow-up
4 months
Study Arms (1)
Cardiac device
All patients implanted with a cardiac device, pacemaker(PM)or Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD)
Interventions
Electrical measures taken during normal follow-up and clinical status of the patient
Eligibility Criteria
All patients who will undergo an in-hospital follow-up of a cardiac device
You may qualify if:
- All patients with a cardiac device
You may not qualify if:
- Follow-up of a cardiac device at discharge from hospital after first implant
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (8)
U.O. Aritmologia - Cliniche Humanitas Gavazzeni
Bergamo, Bergamo, 24121, Italy
Laboratorio di Elettrofisiologia - Spedali Civili
Brescia, Brescia, 25123, Italy
Laboratorio di Elettrofisiologia
Desenzano del Garda, Brescia, 25015, Italy
Laboratorio di Cardiologia - Ospedale Civile
Casalmaggiore, Cremona, 26041, Italy
Laboratorio di Elettrofisiologia - Ospedale A. Manzoni
Lecco, Lecco, 23900, Italy
Laboratorio di Elettrofisiologia
Merate, Lecco, 23807, Italy
Laboratorio di Elettrofisiologia - Ospedale Carlo Poma
Mantova, Mantova, 46100, Italy
Laboratorio di Elettrofisiologia - Ospedale San Matteo
Pavia, Pavia, 27100, Italy
Related Publications (4)
Senges-Becker JC, Klostermann M, Becker R, Bauer A, Siegler KE, Katus HA, Schoels W. What is the "optimal" follow-up schedule for ICD patients? Europace. 2005 Jul;7(4):319-26. doi: 10.1016/j.eupc.2005.02.117.
PMID: 15944090BACKGROUNDFauchier L, Sadoul N, Kouakam C, Briand F, Chauvin M, Babuty D, Clementy J. Potential cost savings by telemedicine-assisted long-term care of implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005 Jan;28 Suppl 1:S255-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.00071.x.
PMID: 15683509BACKGROUNDBrugada P. What evidence do we have to replace in-hospital implantable cardioverter defibrillator follow-up? Clin Res Cardiol. 2006;95 Suppl 3:III3-9. doi: 10.1007/s00392-006-1302-x.
PMID: 16598602RESULTMascioli G, Curnis A, Landolina M, Klersy C, Gelmini GP, Ruffa F; ATHENS Investigators. Actions elicited during scheduled and unscheduled in-hospital follow-up of cardiac devices: results of the ATHENS multicentre registry. Europace. 2011 Dec;13(12):1766-73. doi: 10.1093/europace/eur233. Epub 2011 Jul 14.
PMID: 21764815DERIVED
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Giosue Mascioli
- Organization
- Dept. of Arrhythmology - Cliniche Humanitas Gavazzeni
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Giosue Mascioli, MD
Cliniche Humanitas Gavazzeni
- STUDY CHAIR
Antonio Curnis, MD
Spedali Civili di Brescia
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Maurizio Landolina, MD
Policlinico San Matteo Pavia
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gian-Paolo Gelmini, MD
Ospedale Civile di Desenzano d/Garda
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Franco Ruffa, MD
Ospedale A. Manzoni - Lecco
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 22, 2010
First Posted
February 23, 2010
Study Start
February 1, 2010
Primary Completion
January 1, 2011
Study Completion
January 1, 2011
Last Updated
February 28, 2011
Results First Posted
February 28, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-01