Tools for Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates: Multimedia Versus Print
1 other identifier
interventional
920
1 country
3
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of multimedia and print tools designed to provide patients at safety-net clinics with comprehensible information about colorectal cancer screening and motivate them to complete screening.The print and multimedia interventions were constructed with parallel content to allow valid comparison of format-related effects on knowledge and screening rates.These easy to use tools will provide under served patients at community health centers with clear and consistent messages about colorectal Cancer(CRC) and CRC screening, delivered immediately before the patients see a doctor. Specific Aims
- 1.To determine if multimedia and print interventions that provide patients with information and motivational messages about CRC screening increase screening rates above usual care.
- 2.Determine whether showing patients a multimedia program achieves higher CRC screening rates than does a print booklet with equivalent messages.
- 3.Examine if the effects of these multimedia and print interventions on CRC screening rates differ with literacy level.
- 4.Examine if the effects of these multimedia and print interventions on CRC screening differ with race/ethnicity
- 5.Examine if these multimedia and print interventions have differential effects on knowledge relevant to CRC screening.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3 colorectal-cancer
Started Jul 2008
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 18, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 22, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2012
CompletedSeptember 7, 2012
September 1, 2012
4 years
February 18, 2010
September 6, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Comparison of the acceptance of colorectal cancer screening by patients who view print or multimedia educational tools
3 months post visit
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Role of race/ethnicity and literacy levels on the comparative effects if the intervention
At scheduled appointment
Comparative knowledge of colorectal cancer screening by patients who view the print or multi-media educational tools.
At the scheduled patient visit
Study Arms (3)
Multimedia educational tool
EXPERIMENTALMultimedia education tool - A culturally competent video explaining the importance of and the process of colorectal cancer screening
Print educational tool
EXPERIMENTALPrint media - A culturally competent printed brochure explaining the importance of and the process of colorectal cancer screening
No intervention
ACTIVE COMPARATORUsual and customary waiting room process - Usual and customary office waiting period with access to standard nationally generated colorectal cancer screening informational material in the waiting room and/or exam room.
Interventions
A four minute exposure to an educational video with controlled content on the importance of colorectal cancer screening and explaining the processes and procedures.
Exposure to a printed brochure with controlled content on the importance of colorectal cancer screening and explaining the processes and procedures.
No specialized educational intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening or to explain the process
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years of age,
- Registered for an appointment at one of the target clinics,
- Speaks English or Spanish.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient has had CRC screening in the past 12 months,
- Unable to review the study materials because of language, physical condition or literacy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Trinity Health Of New Englandlead
- American Cancer Society, Inc.collaborator
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicinecollaborator
Study Sites (3)
Midlakes Medical Building
Highland Park, Illinois, 60085, United States
North Chicago Health Center
North Chicago, Illinois, 60064, United States
Belvidere Medical Building
Waukegan, Illinois, 60085, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gregory Makoul, PHD
St. Francis Hospital & Medical Center, Hartford CT
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 18, 2010
First Posted
February 22, 2010
Study Start
July 1, 2008
Primary Completion
July 1, 2012
Study Completion
September 1, 2012
Last Updated
September 7, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-09