Validation of Dyskinesia Rating Scales
1 other identifier
interventional
68
4 countries
8
Brief Summary
This study will evaluate the responsiveness of a variety of available dyskinesia rating scales to treatment with amantadine or placebo in Parkinson's disease patients with dyskinesia. The study will be a parallel, double-blind, randomized trial of 68 patients treated with amantadine or placebo for 8 weeks. Pre-treatment evaluations will be performed and compared to end of study evaluations on the best treatment dose (200 or 300 mg amantadine or matching placebo) daily. Safety evaluations will be conducted. The responsiveness of the different scales will be evaluated statistically with a mixed model in which changes in the outcome measures over time will include a fixed effect of treatment group assignment. The model will additionally account for random effects of intercepts (the scale scores at baseline) that will include both random variation (person-specific) and specific variation associated with rate of change in outcome. The investigators may include adjustments for possible confounding covariates, including baseline demographics and center. The goal of the program is to provide researchers with the best scale(s) to distinguish dyskinesia change in Parkinson's disease (PD) associated with amantadine in comparison to placebo and to establish the magnitude of effect achievable with amantadine as a comparator "gold standard" that must be met or surpassed by future anti-dyskinetic agents. Additionally, with the use of paper and pencil questionnaires, the study will investigate the impact of patient optimism and patient and rater expectation of positive effects on the dyskinesia rating outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Jan 2010
Longer than P75 for phase_4
8 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 17, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 19, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 28, 2015
CompletedDecember 29, 2022
November 1, 2022
2.2 years
February 17, 2010
November 17, 2014
November 23, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The Investigators Will Assess Effect Size With Each Scale for Detecting Change From Baseline and Change Between Amantadine and Placebo; Allowing Assessment of Sensitivity and Specificity for Each Scale Based on Receiver Operator Characteristics (ROC).
Analyses of primary outcome measures tested sensitivity to change in dyskinesia (time effect) as well as sensitivity to differences in treatment effect (time-by-treatment interaction). These analyses were conducted using repeated-measures ANOVA (RM-ANOVA) or nonparametric analyses (Friedman's ANOVA with follow-up Wilcoxon tests). The RM-ANOVAs tested for changes in scale scores over baseline, week 4, and week 8 visits across the entire sample (time effect), as well as differences in these changes over time between treatment groups (time-by-treatment interaction). Effect size of time to change was compared using a partial eta-square estimate of effect size. An eta-squared less than or equal to 0.01 is considered small; 0.06 is considered medium; and, 0.14 is considered large.
18 months
Study Arms (2)
Amantadine
EXPERIMENTALAmantadine 100mg tab BID or TID for duration of study
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo one tab BID or TID for duration of study
Interventions
Amantadine hydrochloride 300mg daily in three divided doses
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Parkinson's disease patient, defined by United Kingdom Brain Bank criteria
- Current age between 30-90
- Clinically pertinent dyskinesias defined by Clinical Gl;obal Impression-severity score (see attachment) \> 3 (mild) established by clinician's total assessment of patient including objective observation during the screening process. \*
- Documentation of creatinine level at screening evaluation that is within the normal range for the local university laboratory.
- Stable doses of all antiparkinsonian medications for at least 4 weeks
- No treatment with amantadine for at least 3 months.
- Presence of a caregiver willing to participate in the study
- Subjects/caregivers must demonstrate the capacity to complete an accurate home diary based on training and evaluation during the screening period (see attached training rules).
- Subjects must be able to provide written informed consent.
- If the subject received amantadine in the past, the drug was stopped for reason other than adverse events.
- In the opinion of the enrolling investigator, the subject will be able to maintain current dosing schedule of antiparkinsonian drugs for the duration of the trial.
- The subject must be willing to participate in all study related activities and visits.
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects who have had prior brain surgery.
- Subjects with other major illnesses that could be complicated by amantadine exposure, including glaucoma, current hallucinations, urinary retention.
- Subjects with dementia, depression and psychosis as determined by clinical examination.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (8)
University of Alabama-Birmingham (UAB)
Birmingham, Alabama, 35043, United States
University of South Florida
Tampa, Florida, 33606, United States
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
Duke University
Durham, North Carolina, 27705, United States
Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU)
Portland, Oregon, 97239-9059, United States
Universitatsklinik fur Neurologie
Innsbruck, 6020, Austria
Toronto Western Hospital (Movement Disorder Center)
Toronto, Ontario, M5T2S8, Canada
Centre d'investigation Clinique, CHU de Toulouse
Toulouse, 31059, France
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Study limitations include the patient population universally derived from university centers and the short duration of the program.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Christopher G. Goetz
- Organization
- Rush University of Medical Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Christopher G Goetz, MD
Rush University Medical Center
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Glenn T Stebbins, PhD
Rush University Medical Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 17, 2010
First Posted
February 19, 2010
Study Start
January 1, 2010
Primary Completion
April 1, 2012
Study Completion
June 1, 2013
Last Updated
December 29, 2022
Results First Posted
May 28, 2015
Record last verified: 2022-11