NCT01071369

Brief Summary

To study improvements or lack thereof with the interlaminar epidural patients with or without steroids experiences mid back, upper back or neck pain with or without chest wall and upper extremity pain of at least 6-months duration non-responsive to conservative management.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
120

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2008

Longer than P75 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2008

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2008

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 14, 2008

Completed
2 years until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 19, 2010

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

April 27, 2017

Status Verified

April 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

Same day

First QC Date

February 14, 2008

Last Update Submit

April 25, 2017

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • To demonstrate clinically significant improvements or lack thereof with the interlaminar epidural patients with or without steroids

    examined improvements between those who received and did not receive steroids

    Patients will return for follow-up visits at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-treatment. The recruitment period is estimated as 24 months with an anticipated study duration of 48 months.

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • To evaluate differences in outcomes in patients receiving steroids compared to those patients randomized to the local anesthetic group who did not receive steroids.

    Patients will return for follow-up visits at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-treatment. The recruitment period is estimated as 24 months with an anticipated study duration of 48 months.

  • To evaluate and compare the adverse event profile in all patients.

    Patients will return for follow-up visits at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-treatment. The recruitment period is estimated as 24 months with an anticipated study duration of 48 months.

Study Arms (2)

Xylocaine

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

0.5% Xylocaine

Drug: Xylocaine

Xylocaine and Celestone

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

0.5% Xylocaine with 6 mg of non-particulate Celestone.

Drug: XylocaineDrug: Xylocaine and Celestone

Interventions

0.5% Xylocaine

XylocaineXylocaine and Celestone

non-particulate Celestone

Also known as: Celestone
Xylocaine and Celestone

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subjects of at least 18 years of age
  • Subjects with a history of chronic, function-limiting thoracic or cervical pain with or without upper extremity pain of at least 6 months in duration
  • Subjects who are able to give voluntary, written informed consent to participate in this investigation
  • Subjects who, in the opinion of the PI, are able to understand this investigation, co-operate with the investigational procedures, and are willing to return to the center for all the required post-operative follow-ups
  • Subjects have not had recent surgical procedures within the last 3 months.

You may not qualify if:

  • Compressive radiculopathy
  • Narcotic use of no greater than hydrocodone 100 mg/day, methadone of 60 mg, or morphine 180 mg, or dose equivalent
  • Uncontrolled major depression or uncontrolled psychiatric disorders
  • Uncontrolled or acute medical illnesses including coagulopathy, renal insufficiency, chronic liver dysfunction, progressive neurological deficit, urinary sphincter dysfunction, infection, increased intracranial pressure, pseudotumor cerebri, intracranial tumors, unstable angina, and severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  • Chronic severe conditions that could interfere with the interpretations of the outcome assessments for pain and bodily function
  • Women who are pregnant or lactating
  • Subjects who have participated in a clinical study with an investigational product within 30 days of enrollment
  • Patients with multiple complaints involving concomitant shoulder osteoarthritis, due to the overlap of pain complaints
  • Inability to achieve appropriate positioning and inability to understand informed consent and protocol
  • History of adverse reaction to local anesthetic or anti-inflammatory drugs and history of gastrointestinal bleeding or ulcers.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ambulatory Surgery Center

Paducah, Kentucky, 42001, United States

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Manchikanti L, Cash KA, Pampati V, Wargo BW, Malla Y. A randomized, double-blind, active control trial of fluoroscopic cervical interlaminar epidural injections in chronic pain of cervical disc herniation: results of a 2-year follow-up. Pain Physician. 2013 Sep-Oct;16(5):465-78.

  • Manchikanti L, Malla Y, Cash KA, McManus CD, Pampati V. Fluoroscopic epidural injections in cervical spinal stenosis: preliminary results of a randomized, double-blind, active control trial. Pain Physician. 2012 Jan-Feb;15(1):E59-70.

  • Manchikanti L, Malla Y, Cash KA, McManus CD, Pampati V. Fluoroscopic cervical interlaminar epidural injections in managing chronic pain of cervical postsurgery syndrome: preliminary results of a randomized, double-blind, active control trial. Pain Physician. 2012 Jan-Feb;15(1):13-25.

  • Manchikanti L, Cash KA, McManus CD, Pampati V, Benyamin RM. A preliminary report of a randomized double-blind, active controlled trial of fluoroscopic thoracic interlaminar epidural injections in managing chronic thoracic pain. Pain Physician. 2010 Nov-Dec;13(6):E357-69.

  • Manchikanti L, Cash KA, Pampati V, Wargo BW, Malla Y. Cervical epidural injections in chronic discogenic neck pain without disc herniation or radiculitis: preliminary results of a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Pain Physician. 2010 Jul-Aug;13(4):E265-78.

  • Manchikanti L, Cash KA, Pampati V, Wargo BW, Malla Y. The effectiveness of fluoroscopic cervical interlaminar epidural injections in managing chronic cervical disc herniation and radiculitis: preliminary results of a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Pain Physician. 2010 May-Jun;13(3):223-36.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Back PainNeck Pain

Interventions

LidocaineBetamethasone

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AcetanilidesAnilidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsAniline CompoundsAminesPregnadienetriolsPregnadienesPregnanesSteroidsFused-Ring CompoundsPolycyclic CompoundsSteroids, Fluorinated

Study Officials

  • Laxmaiah Manchikanti, MD

    Ambulatory Surgery Center, Paducah

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Masking Details
Randomly assigned to groups
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Medical Director

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 14, 2008

First Posted

February 19, 2010

Study Start

February 1, 2008

Primary Completion

February 1, 2008

Study Completion

June 1, 2012

Last Updated

April 27, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Available IPD Datasets

Clinical Study Report Access

Locations