Peer Debriefing Versus Instructor Debriefing for Interprofessional Simulation Based Education
PICS
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Crisis management is important for operating room practice and non-technical skills are acknowledged as key to ensure patient safety in these situations. Unfortunately, it can be difficult to find instructors with appropriate experience. A peer-led team debriefing is led by the team it self rather than an external expert instructor but remains a reflective process. Incorporating peer-led debriefing compared to expert-led debriefing may increase access to an interprofessional crisis resource management course using simulation. The goals of the study are to observe the effect of an interprofessional peer-led team debriefing in the change in performance of non-technical skills of team performance and to compare it with the "gold standard" of expert-led debriefing on the performance of non-technical skills during a simulated operating room crisis. The investigators hypothesize that interprofessional peer-led debriefing will improve the performance of non-technical skills of the team during simulated intraoperative crisis management and that this improvement will be equivalent to the "gold standard" expert-led debriefing.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2010
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 11, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2012
CompletedNovember 17, 2015
November 1, 2015
2.1 years
February 1, 2010
November 16, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Performance of non-technical skills of the teams.
1 year
Study Arms (2)
Expert instructor debriefing
ACTIVE COMPARATORExpert instructor debriefing
Peer-led debriefing
EXPERIMENTALPeer-led debriefing
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Operating room (OR) nurses from St. Michael's Hospital and University of Toronto Anesthesia and Surgery Residents/Fellows
You may not qualify if:
- OR nurses from other hospitals and Residents/Fellows from other programs
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Allan Waters' Family Patient Simulation Centre
Toronto, Ontario, M5B 1W8, Canada
Related Publications (1)
Boet S, Bould MD, Sharma B, Revees S, Naik VN, Triby E, Grantcharov T. Within-team debriefing versus instructor-led debriefing for simulation-based education: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2013 Jul;258(1):53-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31829659e4.
PMID: 23728281RESULT
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 1, 2010
First Posted
February 11, 2010
Study Start
June 1, 2010
Primary Completion
July 1, 2012
Study Completion
July 1, 2012
Last Updated
November 17, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-11