NCT01066026

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of a new metallic cannula to inject hyaluronic acid for dermal augmentation in the nasolabial folds compared to standard needle.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
25

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2009

Shorter than P25 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2009

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2010

Completed
25 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 26, 2010

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 10, 2010

Completed
19 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2010

Completed
10.5 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

September 9, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

October 1, 2020

Status Verified

September 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

January 26, 2010

Results QC Date

February 22, 2012

Last Update Submit

September 9, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

metallic cannulaHyaluronic acid

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Number of Participants With Haematoma

    Number of participants with haematoma at each visit

    Day 1; day 3; day 7; day 90

  • Number of Participants With Erythema

    Number of participants with erythema at each visit

    Day 1; day 3; day 7; day 90

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Modified Fitzpatrick Wrinkle Scale (MFWS)

    Baseline and 90 days

  • Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale

    90 days

Study Arms (2)

Metallic cannula

EXPERIMENTAL

Nasolabial Fold with metallic cannula and hyaluronic acid injected. hyaluronic acid with metallic cannula or standard needle. Hyaluronic acid injected with the new tool

Procedure: hyaluronic acid with metallic cannula or standard needle.Drug: Hyaluronic acid injected with the new tool.

Standard needle

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Nasolabial Fold with standard needle and hyaluronic acid injected. hyaluronic acid with metallic cannula or standard needle.

Procedure: hyaluronic acid with metallic cannula or standard needle.

Interventions

The sides of injection were randomized and both the subject and the evaluator were blind to it. The injections were performed according through two different devices: * In one of the sides, the hyaluronic acid (Restylane®) was injected in its conventional pharmaceutical presentation, with a standard needle which is part of the product's kit; * In the other side, the hyaluronic acid (Restylane®) was injected through a metallic cannula, which replaced the needle of the product's kit. Local analgesia was provided for both applications: topical analgesics 4% Lidocaine, for the application with the standard needle, and nerve block (Lidocaine 2%), where the application was performed with the metallic cannula.

Also known as: Restylane
Metallic cannulaStandard needle

hyaluronic acid with metallic cannula.

Also known as: Restylane
Metallic cannula

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Subjects agreeing to take part of the study, after being fully informed of the purpose and the nature of the investigation and after having signed the informed consent form
  • Female subjects aged from 18 to 60
  • Fitzpatrick phototype I to VI
  • Presence of bilateral folds graded from 2 to 3 according to the Modified
  • Fitzpatrick Wrinkle Scale
  • Subjects that have never performed any treatment of nasolabial folds
  • Female subjects of childbearing age that present a negative urine pregnancy test and are using an effective contraceptive method
  • Subjects who will be available throughout the duration of the study
  • Subjects with sufficient schooling and awareness to enable them to cooperate to the degree required by this protocol.

You may not qualify if:

  • Use of systemic corticosteroids
  • History of herpes in lip
  • Inflammation or active infection in the area to be injected
  • Any surgical treatment or cosmetic procedure in the area to be injected that interfere in study's outcomes
  • Coagulation disorders or use of anticoagulants
  • Previous hypersensitivity responses to Hyaluronic acid.
  • Pregnant or women in breastfeeding, or women planning to become pregnant

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Brazilian Center for Studies in Dermatology

Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90570-040, Brazil

Location

Centro Brasileiro de Estudos em Dermatologia

Porto Alegre, Brazil

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Hyaluronic AcidRestylane

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

GlycosaminoglycansPolysaccharidesCarbohydrates

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Doris Hexsel
Organization
Brazilian Center for Studies in Dermatology

Study Officials

  • Doris Hesxel, MD

    CBED

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 26, 2010

First Posted

February 10, 2010

Study Start

July 1, 2009

Primary Completion

January 1, 2010

Study Completion

March 1, 2010

Last Updated

October 1, 2020

Results First Posted

September 9, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-09

Locations