Safety and Efficacy of a Metallic Cannula Versus A Standard Needle for Soft Tissue Augmentation of the Nasolabial Folds
Double-blind, Randomized and Controlled Clinical Trial to Compare Safety and Efficacy of a Metallic Cannula vs a Standard Needle for the Injection of Hyaluronic Acid Gel Dermal Filler (Restylane®) to Treat Nasolabial Folds
1 other identifier
interventional
25
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of a new metallic cannula to inject hyaluronic acid for dermal augmentation in the nasolabial folds compared to standard needle.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2
Started Jul 2009
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 26, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 10, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 9, 2020
CompletedOctober 1, 2020
September 1, 2020
6 months
January 26, 2010
February 22, 2012
September 9, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Number of Participants With Haematoma
Number of participants with haematoma at each visit
Day 1; day 3; day 7; day 90
Number of Participants With Erythema
Number of participants with erythema at each visit
Day 1; day 3; day 7; day 90
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Modified Fitzpatrick Wrinkle Scale (MFWS)
Baseline and 90 days
Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale
90 days
Study Arms (2)
Metallic cannula
EXPERIMENTALNasolabial Fold with metallic cannula and hyaluronic acid injected. hyaluronic acid with metallic cannula or standard needle. Hyaluronic acid injected with the new tool
Standard needle
ACTIVE COMPARATORNasolabial Fold with standard needle and hyaluronic acid injected. hyaluronic acid with metallic cannula or standard needle.
Interventions
The sides of injection were randomized and both the subject and the evaluator were blind to it. The injections were performed according through two different devices: * In one of the sides, the hyaluronic acid (Restylane®) was injected in its conventional pharmaceutical presentation, with a standard needle which is part of the product's kit; * In the other side, the hyaluronic acid (Restylane®) was injected through a metallic cannula, which replaced the needle of the product's kit. Local analgesia was provided for both applications: topical analgesics 4% Lidocaine, for the application with the standard needle, and nerve block (Lidocaine 2%), where the application was performed with the metallic cannula.
hyaluronic acid with metallic cannula.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects agreeing to take part of the study, after being fully informed of the purpose and the nature of the investigation and after having signed the informed consent form
- Female subjects aged from 18 to 60
- Fitzpatrick phototype I to VI
- Presence of bilateral folds graded from 2 to 3 according to the Modified
- Fitzpatrick Wrinkle Scale
- Subjects that have never performed any treatment of nasolabial folds
- Female subjects of childbearing age that present a negative urine pregnancy test and are using an effective contraceptive method
- Subjects who will be available throughout the duration of the study
- Subjects with sufficient schooling and awareness to enable them to cooperate to the degree required by this protocol.
You may not qualify if:
- Use of systemic corticosteroids
- History of herpes in lip
- Inflammation or active infection in the area to be injected
- Any surgical treatment or cosmetic procedure in the area to be injected that interfere in study's outcomes
- Coagulation disorders or use of anticoagulants
- Previous hypersensitivity responses to Hyaluronic acid.
- Pregnant or women in breastfeeding, or women planning to become pregnant
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Brazilian Center for Studies in Dermatology
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90570-040, Brazil
Centro Brasileiro de Estudos em Dermatologia
Porto Alegre, Brazil
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Doris Hexsel
- Organization
- Brazilian Center for Studies in Dermatology
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Doris Hesxel, MD
CBED
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 26, 2010
First Posted
February 10, 2010
Study Start
July 1, 2009
Primary Completion
January 1, 2010
Study Completion
March 1, 2010
Last Updated
October 1, 2020
Results First Posted
September 9, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-09