Cosalin® Monotherapy Versus Cosalin® and Xarlin® Combination Therapy
A Randomized, Parallel, Double-blind, Multi-center, Comparative Study to Exploratively Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Cosalin® Monotherapy vs. Cosalin® and Xarlin® Combination Therapy in Patients With Allergic Rhinitis
1 other identifier
interventional
100
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Title of Study: A randomized, parallel, double-blind, multi-center, comparative study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Cosalin monotherapy versus Cosalin and Xarlin combination therapy in patients with allergic rhinitis Objective of study: To exploratively evaluate superiority of combination therapy - twice-daily Cosalin Tab (Petasites hybridus CO2 extract) with once-daily Xarlin Tab (Levocetirizine HCl) - compared to monotherapy of Cosalin with allergic rhinitis subjects.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 2, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 4, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2010
CompletedFebruary 4, 2010
February 1, 2010
6 months
February 2, 2010
February 3, 2010
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Compare efficacy improvement of combination therapy group and mono therapy group by percent change of 4 TSS from baseline to end of treatment by investigator.
2 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Compare percent change of evening reflective 4 TSS from baseline to end of treatment by using patient diary.
2 weeks
Compare percent change of instantaneous 4 TSS from baseline to end of treatment by using patient diary.
2 weeks
Compare percent change of evening reflective nasal congestion score from baseline to end of treatment by using patient diary.
2 weeks
Compare percent change of instantaneous nasal congestion score from baseline to end of treatment by using patient diary.
2 weeks
Compare percent change of evening reflective 5 TSS (5 TSS - runny nose, itchy nose, sneezing, ocular symptom, nasal congestion)by using patient diary.
2 weeks
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Petasites extract, levocetirizine
EXPERIMENTALCosalin (Petasites hybridus CO2 extract), Xarlin (levocetirizine) combination therapy group
Cosalin (Petasites hybridus CO2 extract)
ACTIVE COMPARATORCosalin monotherapy
Interventions
Combination therapy compared to mono therapy
Combination therapy compared to mono therapy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male and female volunteer more than 18 years old and less than 66 years old.
- A volunteer who is informed about this study and sign the informed consent.
- A volunteer who is diagnosed perennial allergic rhinitis greater than grade3 at visit 1(screening visit) by allergy skin test or serum IgE antibody assay in 24 months.
- A volunteer who has score 8 and more than 8 point 4 Total Symptom Score (4TSS - runny nose, nasal congestion, itchy nose, sneezing).
You may not qualify if:
- A volunteer who has hypersensitivity to Levocetirizine or Hydroxyzine
- A volunteer who has hypersensitivity to Petasites hybridus leaves.
- A volunteer who has anaphylaxis or hypersensitivity to allergy skin test.
- A volunteer who has serious renal failure or liver failure. Ingestion of antibiotics during previous two weeks from Visit 1, cause of upper respiratory infection(include paranasal sinus).
- A volunteer who need to use steroids cause of asthma.
- A volunteer who is using steroids, decongestants, antihistamine.
- A volunteer who has rhinitis medicamentosa.
- A volunteer who has seasonal allergic rhinitis.
- A volunteer who has Galactose intolerance, Lapp lactose deficiency, or glucose-galactose malabsorption genetic disorder .
- A volunteer who is an alcoholic or a drug addict.
- Women who are pregnant, breast-feeding, women who plan to get pregnant during the trial period, or do not use authorized contraceptive methods (e.g: sterilization, intrauterine device, combined use of oral contraceptives and barrier contraceptive, combined use of other hormone delivery systems and barrier contraceptive and combined use of contraceptive cream, jelly or foam and diaphragm or condom) in spite of possibility of pregnancy.
- A volunteer who has experience to take test products in 1 month.
- A volunteer who is concluded poor compliance or fail to follow medical instruction
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 2, 2010
First Posted
February 4, 2010
Study Start
October 1, 2009
Primary Completion
April 1, 2010
Last Updated
February 4, 2010
Record last verified: 2010-02