Study of AR-12286 Versus Latanoprost in Patients With Elevated Intraocular Pressure
A Phase 2, Double-masked, Randomized, Active-controlled, Dose-response Study Assessing the Safety and Ocular Hypotensive Efficacy of AR-12286 in Patients With Elevated Intraocular Pressure
1 other identifier
interventional
217
1 country
18
Brief Summary
A 28 day study of the safety and efficacy of two concentrations of topical AR-12286 in treating ocular hypertension and open-angle glaucoma compared to latanoprost. Hypothesis: The ocular hypotensive efficacy of each dose of AR-12286 ophthalmic solution will not be different from that of an active control.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Feb 2010
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
18 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 30, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 2, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2010
CompletedMay 8, 2014
April 1, 2014
6 months
January 30, 2010
April 18, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The primary efficacy endpoint will be the mean intraocular pressure (IOP) across subjects within treatment group on each day at each post-treatment timepoint
28 days of dosing
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Mean change from diurnally adjusted baseline IOP at each timepoint
28 days of dosing
Study Arms (3)
AR-12286 0.5% ophthalmic solution
EXPERIMENTALAR-12286 0.25% Ophthalmic Solution
EXPERIMENTALLatanoprost 0.005% ophthalmic solution
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
q.d. PM
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years of age or greater.
- Diagnosis of open angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT) and currently being treated with ocular hypotensive medication.
- Unmedicated (post-washout) IOP ≥ 22 mm Hg at 2 eligibility visits (07:00-09:00 hr), 2-7 days apart.
- Corrected visual acuity in each eye +1.0 logMAR or better by ETDRS in each eye (equivalent to 20/200).
- Has used a commercially available IOP-lowering medication in one or both eyes for at least 30 days over the 90 days prior to the screening visit.
- Able and willing to give signed informed consent and follow study instructions.
You may not qualify if:
- Ophthalmic (in either eye):
- Glaucoma: pseudoexfoliation or pigment dispersion component, history of angle closure. Note: Previous laser peripheral iridotomy is acceptable.
- Intraocular pressure \> 36 mm Hg
- Known hypersensitivity to any component of the formulation (benzalkonium chloride, etc.), or to topical anesthetics.
- Previous glaucoma intraocular surgery or glaucoma laser procedures in study eye(s).
- Refractive surgery in study eye(s) (e.g., radial keratotomy, PRK, LASIK, etc.).
- Ocular trauma within the past six months, or ocular surgery or laser treatment within the past three months.
- History or evidence of ocular infection, inflammation, clinically significant blepharitis or conjunctivitis at baseline (Visit 1), or of herpes simplex keratitis
- Contact lens wear within 30 minutes of instillation of study medication.
- Ocular medication of any kind within 30 days of Visit 1, with the exception of a) ocular hypotensive medications (which must be washed out according to the provided schedule), b) lid scrubs (which may be used prior to, but not after Visit 1) or c) lubricating drops for dry eye (which may be used throughout the study).
- Clinically significant ocular disease (e.g. corneal edema, uveitis, severe keratoconjunctivitis sicca) which might interfere with the study, including glaucomatous damage so severe that washout of ocular hypotensive medications for one month is not judged safe (i.e., cup-disc ratio \> 0.8).
- Central corneal thickness greater than 600 μ.
- Any abnormality preventing reliable applanation tonometry of either eye.
- Systemic:
- Clinically significant abnormalities in laboratory tests at screening.
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (18)
United Medical Research Institute
Inglewood, California, 90301, United States
North Bay Eye Associates
Petaluma, California, 94954, United States
Centre For Health Care
Poway, California, 92064, United States
East Florida Eye Institute
Stuart, Florida, 34994, United States
Marvin Greenberg, MD
Tamarac, Florida, 33321, United States
Coastal Research Associates, LLC
Roswell, Georgia, 30076, United States
Bradley Kwapiszeski, MD
Shawnee Mission, Kansas, 66204, United States
Taustine Eye Center
Louisville, Kentucky, 40217, United States
Comprehensive Eye Care
St Louis, Missouri, 63090, United States
Mount Sinai School Of Medicine
New York, New York, 10029, United States
Rochester Ophthalmology Group
Rochester, New York, 14618, United States
Glaucoma Consultants of the Capital Region
Slingerlands, New York, 12159, United States
Charlotte Eye Ear Nose and Throat
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28210, United States
The Eye Institute
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74104, United States
Black Hills Regional Eye Institute
Rapid City, South Dakota, 57701, United States
Univ Eye Surgeons, Maryville Ctr.
Maryville, Tennessee, 37803, United States
Texan Eye
Austin, Texas, 78731, United States
Medical Center Ophth. Associates
San Antonio, Texas, 78731, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Thomas van Haarlem, MD
Aerie Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 30, 2010
First Posted
February 2, 2010
Study Start
February 1, 2010
Primary Completion
August 1, 2010
Study Completion
August 1, 2010
Last Updated
May 8, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-04