NCT01057446

Brief Summary

The aim of the investigators study is to assess the bowel cleansing effects of two different agents and to compare their safety of application, ease of usage and effects on serum electrolytes.

Trial Health

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 26, 2010

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 27, 2010

Completed
Last Updated

February 5, 2010

Status Verified

November 1, 2009

First QC Date

January 26, 2010

Last Update Submit

February 4, 2010

Conditions

Keywords

Colonoscopy preparationsennosidesodium phosphatethe aim is to assess the bowel cleansing effects of two different agents

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Colonic cleansing was evaluated by using the amount and consistency of stool remained in the colonic segment

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Ninety-nine patients requiring diagnostic outpatient colonoscopy were prospectively recruited for the study and randomized by internet based Easy sample random numbers software program to two arms of sodium phosphate versus Sennosid A+B calcium preparation.

You may qualify if:

  • Patients requiring diagnostic outpatient colonoscopy.
  • Over the age of 18 and giving informed consent by their will.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients unable to give informed consent
  • Those younger than 18 years old
  • Those with a known history of chronic renal failure
  • Pregnant women and those with a known history of bowel resection were excluded

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (1)

  • Manukyan MN, Tolan K, Severge U, Attaallah W, Kebudi A, Cingi A. Prospective randomized comparison of oral sodium phosphate and sennoside A+B calcium lavage for colonoscopy preparation. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2011 Apr;21(2):90-3. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31820e8793.

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CONTROL
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 26, 2010

First Posted

January 27, 2010

Last Updated

February 5, 2010

Record last verified: 2009-11