Micropulse 577 nm Laser Photocoagulation Versus Conventional 532 nm Laser Photocoagulation for Diabetic Macular Oedema
UMDMO
A Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Micropulse 577 nm Laser Photocoagulation And Conventional 532 nm Laser Photocoagulation for Diabetic Macular Oedema
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the new micropulse 577 nm yellow laser is a better treatment option compared to the conventional 532 nm green laser for diabetic macular edema.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Oct 2009
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 7, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 8, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2012
CompletedJanuary 8, 2010
January 1, 2010
2 years
January 7, 2010
January 7, 2010
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Best corrected visual acuity by logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (LogMAR)
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Macular thickness measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT)
12 months
Photocoagulation scars on fundus photograph
12 months
Study Arms (2)
Micropulse 577 nm yellow diode laser
EXPERIMENTAL532 nm green diode laser
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Laser administered at beginning of study and may be repeated at 16 weeks if needed
Laser administered at beginning of study and may be repeated at 16 weeks if needed
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diabetes mellitus (type 1 or 2)
- Diabetic macular edema in study eye associated to diabetic retinopathy
- Diffuse macular edema defined as macular thickening determined by biomicroscopy, OCT and/or fluorescein angiography.
- Best corrected visual acuity between 34 (20/200) and 68 letters (20/50).
- Macular thickness greater than 300 mcm on OCT.
You may not qualify if:
- Significant renal disease, defined as a history of chronic renal failure requiring dialysis or kidney transplant.
- A condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude participation in the study (e.g., unstable medical status including blood pressure, cardiovascular disease, and glycemic control).
- Blood pressure \> 180/110 (systolic above 180 OR diastolic above 110).
- Subject is expecting to move out of the area of the clinical center to an area not covered by another clinical center during the next 6 months.
- Macular edema is considered to be due to a cause other than diabetic macular edema.
- Presence of vitreomacular traction.
- Concurrent proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
- An ocular condition is present such that, in the opinion of the investigator, visual acuity loss would not improve from resolution of macular edema (e.g., foveal atrophy, pigment abnormalities, dense subfoveal hard exudates, significant macular ischemia, nonretinal condition).
- An ocular condition is present (other than diabetes) that, in the opinion of the investigator, might affect macular edema or alter visual acuity during the course of the study (e.g., vein occlusion, uveitis epiretinal membrane, or other ocular inflammatory disease, neovascular glaucoma, etc.).
- Substantial cataract that, in the opinion of the investigator, is likely to be decreasing visual acuity by 3 lines or more (i.e., cataract would be reducing acuity to 20/40 or worse if eye was otherwise normal).
- History of treatment for DME at any time in the past 4 months (such as focal/grid macular photocoagulation, intravitreal or peribulbar corticosteroids, anti-VEGF drugs, or any other treatment).
- History of panretinal (scatter) photocoagulation (PRP) prior to enrollment or anticipated to be performed within next 6 months.
- History of major ocular surgery (including vitrectomy, cataract extraction, scleral buckle, any intraocular surgery, etc.) within prior 12 months or anticipated within the next 6 months.
- History of YAG capsulotomy performed within 2 months prior to enrollment.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Malaya Eye Research Centre
Kuala Lumpur, 59100, Malaysia
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kenneth C Fong, FRCOphth
University of Malaya Eye Research Centre
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tajunisah Iqbal, FRCS
University of Malaya Eye Research Centre
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 7, 2010
First Posted
January 8, 2010
Study Start
October 1, 2009
Primary Completion
October 1, 2011
Study Completion
January 1, 2012
Last Updated
January 8, 2010
Record last verified: 2010-01