NCT01041859

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of orally administered tapentadol extended release (ER) at dosages of 100 to 250 mg twice daily compared with placebo in patients with moderate to severe pain due to chronic, painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) who tolerated tapentadol (ER) and have an initial treatment effect (pain improvement) after a 3-week, open-label titration period.

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
460

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2009

Shorter than P25 for phase_3

Geographic Reach
3 countries

72 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2009

Completed
29 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 30, 2009

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 1, 2010

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2011

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2011

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 14, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

September 11, 2013

Status Verified

August 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

December 30, 2009

Results QC Date

March 8, 2012

Last Update Submit

August 29, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

Diabetic Peripheral NeuropathyPainfulPolyneuropathyPeripheral neuropathy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change From Double-Blind Baseline of the Average Pain Intensity Based on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale(NRS) Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12

    For this twice daily pain assessment, the patients were to indicate the level of pain experienced over the previous 12 hours on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) where a score of 0 indicated "no pain" and a score of 10 indicated "pain as bad as you can imagine".

    Double-Blind Baseline and 12 weeks (Primary endpoint is the average pain intensity score during the last week of the maintenance period)

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Responder Analysis: Proportion of Patients With At Least 50% Improvement From Baseline of Open-Label on the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at the Week 12 Endpoint

    Open-label Baseline and End of Double-Blind Treatment at 15 Weeks (3 weeks open-label plus 12 weeks double-blind)

  • Distribution of Patient Global Impression of Change at Week 12 Endpoint

    End of Double-Blind Treatment at 12 Weeks

  • Change From Baseline of Open-Label in the Pain Intensity Subscale of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) at the Week 12 Double-Blind Endpoint

    Open-label Baseline and End of Double-Blind Treatment at 15 Weeks (3 weeks open-label plus 12 weeks double-blind)

  • Change From Baseline in the EuroQoL-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Health Status Index at the Week 12 Endpoint

    Double-blind Baseline and End of Double-Blind Treatment at 12 Weeks

Study Arms (2)

Tapentadol Extended Release (ER)

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: Tapentadol extended release (ER)

Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR
Drug: Placebo

Interventions

Type= range, unit= mg, number= 100 to 250, form= tablet, route= oral use. Tapentadol ER optimal dose ranging between 100 mg and 250 mg twice daily for 15 weeks.

Tapentadol Extended Release (ER)

Form= tablet, route= oral use. Matching placebo twice daily.

Placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with Type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus must have a documented clinical diagnosis of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy with symptoms and signs for at least 6 months, and pain present at the time of screening
  • Diagnosis must include pain plus reduction or absence of pin sensibility and/or vibration sensibility on Total Neuropathy Score - Nurse (TNSn) examination in lower and/or upper extremities at screening
  • The investigator considers the patient's blood glucose to be controlled by diet, or hypoglycemics, or insulin for at least 3 months prior to enrolling in the study
  • Patients have been taking analgesic medications for the condition for at least 3 months prior to screening (patients taking opioid analgesics must be dissatisfied with current treatment, and patients taking non-opioid analgesics must be dissatisfied with current analgesia)
  • Patients currently requiring opioid treatment must be taking daily doses of an opioid-based analgesic equivalent to \<=160mg of oral morphine

You may not qualify if:

  • Significant history of pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, metabolic (except diabetes mellitus), neurological, psychiatric disorders (resulting in disorientation, memory impairment or inability to report accurately as in schizophrenia)
  • History of moderate to severe hepatic impairment
  • Severely impaired renal function
  • Clinically significant laboratory abnormalities
  • Clinically significant cardiac disease
  • History of seizure disorder or epilepsy
  • History of any other clinically significant disease that in the investigator's opinion may affect efficacy or safety assessments or may compromise patient safety during study participation

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (72)

Unknown Facility

Mobile, Alabama, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Chandler, Arizona, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Mesa, Arizona, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Fresno, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Orange, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Redding, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Sacramento, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

San Francisco, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Spring Valley, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Walnut Creek, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Denver, Colorado, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Clearwater, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Hallandale, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Miami, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Ormond Beach, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

St. Petersburg, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Tampa, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

West Palm Beach, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Marietta, Georgia, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Boise, Idaho, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Eagle, Idaho, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Meridian, Idaho, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Avon, Indiana, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Evansville, Indiana, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Fishers, Indiana, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Prairie Village, Kansas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Shreveport, Louisiana, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Owings Mills, Maryland, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Pasadena, Maryland, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Rockville, Maryland, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Brockton, Massachusetts, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Edina, Minnesota, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Cedarhurst, New York, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Flushing, New York, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

New York, New York, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Rochester, New York, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Valley Stream, New York, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Williamsville, New York, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Hickory, North Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Akron, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Medford, Oregon, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Altoona, Pennsylvania, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Anderson, South Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Greer, South Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Bulverde, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Dallas, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Houston, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Odessa, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Schertz, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Alexandria, Virginia, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Barrie, Ontario, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Greater Sudbury, Ontario, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Hawkesbury, Ontario, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Sarnia, Ontario, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Dollard-des-Ormeaux, Quebec, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Laval, Quebec, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

San Juan, Puerto Rico

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

PainPolyneuropathiesPeripheral Nervous System Diseases

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsNeuromuscular DiseasesNervous System Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Director, Clinical Leader
Organization
Janssen Research&Development

Study Officials

  • Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C. Clinical Trial

    Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 30, 2009

First Posted

January 1, 2010

Study Start

December 1, 2009

Primary Completion

March 1, 2011

Study Completion

March 1, 2011

Last Updated

September 11, 2013

Results First Posted

May 14, 2012

Record last verified: 2013-08

Locations