A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Tapentadol ER Compared With Placebo in Patients With Chronic, Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
A Randomized-Withdrawal, Placebo-Controlled, Study Evaluating the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Tapentadol Extended-Release (ER) in Subjects With Chronic, Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN)
3 other identifiers
interventional
460
3 countries
72
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of orally administered tapentadol extended release (ER) at dosages of 100 to 250 mg twice daily compared with placebo in patients with moderate to severe pain due to chronic, painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) who tolerated tapentadol (ER) and have an initial treatment effect (pain improvement) after a 3-week, open-label titration period.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Dec 2009
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
72 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 30, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 14, 2012
CompletedSeptember 11, 2013
August 1, 2013
1.2 years
December 30, 2009
March 8, 2012
August 29, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change From Double-Blind Baseline of the Average Pain Intensity Based on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale(NRS) Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12
For this twice daily pain assessment, the patients were to indicate the level of pain experienced over the previous 12 hours on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) where a score of 0 indicated "no pain" and a score of 10 indicated "pain as bad as you can imagine".
Double-Blind Baseline and 12 weeks (Primary endpoint is the average pain intensity score during the last week of the maintenance period)
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Responder Analysis: Proportion of Patients With At Least 50% Improvement From Baseline of Open-Label on the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at the Week 12 Endpoint
Open-label Baseline and End of Double-Blind Treatment at 15 Weeks (3 weeks open-label plus 12 weeks double-blind)
Distribution of Patient Global Impression of Change at Week 12 Endpoint
End of Double-Blind Treatment at 12 Weeks
Change From Baseline of Open-Label in the Pain Intensity Subscale of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) at the Week 12 Double-Blind Endpoint
Open-label Baseline and End of Double-Blind Treatment at 15 Weeks (3 weeks open-label plus 12 weeks double-blind)
Change From Baseline in the EuroQoL-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Health Status Index at the Week 12 Endpoint
Double-blind Baseline and End of Double-Blind Treatment at 12 Weeks
Study Arms (2)
Tapentadol Extended Release (ER)
EXPERIMENTALPlacebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
Type= range, unit= mg, number= 100 to 250, form= tablet, route= oral use. Tapentadol ER optimal dose ranging between 100 mg and 250 mg twice daily for 15 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with Type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus must have a documented clinical diagnosis of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy with symptoms and signs for at least 6 months, and pain present at the time of screening
- Diagnosis must include pain plus reduction or absence of pin sensibility and/or vibration sensibility on Total Neuropathy Score - Nurse (TNSn) examination in lower and/or upper extremities at screening
- The investigator considers the patient's blood glucose to be controlled by diet, or hypoglycemics, or insulin for at least 3 months prior to enrolling in the study
- Patients have been taking analgesic medications for the condition for at least 3 months prior to screening (patients taking opioid analgesics must be dissatisfied with current treatment, and patients taking non-opioid analgesics must be dissatisfied with current analgesia)
- Patients currently requiring opioid treatment must be taking daily doses of an opioid-based analgesic equivalent to \<=160mg of oral morphine
You may not qualify if:
- Significant history of pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, metabolic (except diabetes mellitus), neurological, psychiatric disorders (resulting in disorientation, memory impairment or inability to report accurately as in schizophrenia)
- History of moderate to severe hepatic impairment
- Severely impaired renal function
- Clinically significant laboratory abnormalities
- Clinically significant cardiac disease
- History of seizure disorder or epilepsy
- History of any other clinically significant disease that in the investigator's opinion may affect efficacy or safety assessments or may compromise patient safety during study participation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (72)
Unknown Facility
Mobile, Alabama, United States
Unknown Facility
Chandler, Arizona, United States
Unknown Facility
Mesa, Arizona, United States
Unknown Facility
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Unknown Facility
Fresno, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Orange, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Redding, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Sacramento, California, United States
Unknown Facility
San Francisco, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Spring Valley, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Walnut Creek, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Denver, Colorado, United States
Unknown Facility
Clearwater, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Hallandale, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Miami, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Ormond Beach, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
St. Petersburg, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Tampa, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
West Palm Beach, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Unknown Facility
Marietta, Georgia, United States
Unknown Facility
Boise, Idaho, United States
Unknown Facility
Eagle, Idaho, United States
Unknown Facility
Meridian, Idaho, United States
Unknown Facility
Avon, Indiana, United States
Unknown Facility
Evansville, Indiana, United States
Unknown Facility
Fishers, Indiana, United States
Unknown Facility
Prairie Village, Kansas, United States
Unknown Facility
Shreveport, Louisiana, United States
Unknown Facility
Owings Mills, Maryland, United States
Unknown Facility
Pasadena, Maryland, United States
Unknown Facility
Rockville, Maryland, United States
Unknown Facility
Brockton, Massachusetts, United States
Unknown Facility
Edina, Minnesota, United States
Unknown Facility
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Unknown Facility
Cedarhurst, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Flushing, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
New York, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Rochester, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Valley Stream, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Williamsville, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Hickory, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Akron, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Medford, Oregon, United States
Unknown Facility
Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Altoona, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Anderson, South Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Greer, South Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Bulverde, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Dallas, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Houston, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Odessa, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Schertz, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Unknown Facility
Alexandria, Virginia, United States
Unknown Facility
Norfolk, Virginia, United States
Unknown Facility
Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States
Unknown Facility
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Unknown Facility
Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
Unknown Facility
Barrie, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
Greater Sudbury, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
Hawkesbury, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
Sarnia, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
Dollard-des-Ormeaux, Quebec, Canada
Unknown Facility
Laval, Quebec, Canada
Unknown Facility
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Unknown Facility
San Juan, Puerto Rico
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Director, Clinical Leader
- Organization
- Janssen Research&Development
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C. Clinical Trial
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 30, 2009
First Posted
January 1, 2010
Study Start
December 1, 2009
Primary Completion
March 1, 2011
Study Completion
March 1, 2011
Last Updated
September 11, 2013
Results First Posted
May 14, 2012
Record last verified: 2013-08