Cost Effectiveness of Language Services in Hospital Emergency Departments (EDs)
1 other identifier
interventional
447
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Numerous studies suggest that the use of in-person, professionally trained medical interpreters can reduce health care costs associated with diagnosing and treating patients with limited English proficiency. However, few studies have specifically addressed the question of the cost-effectiveness of language services in health care settings. This study used a randomized controlled study design to compare the cost-effectiveness of using professional interpreters with Spanish-speaking patients seen in hospital emergency departments (EDs) versus using the usual language services available to these patients. The main goal of the study was to estimate the effect that professional interpreters have on resource utilization and patient/provider satisfaction in the ED compared to the language services usually offered in these settings. Our hypothesis was that use of trained interpreters would lead to more cost-effective provision of ED services.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2008
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 28, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 30, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2010
CompletedOctober 1, 2015
December 1, 2009
6 months
December 28, 2009
September 29, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Cost-effectiveness of in-person interpreters versus other language services
June 2009
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Satisfaction with ability to communicate
June 2009
Study Arms (2)
Professional medical interpreter
EXPERIMENTALLimited English proficient Spanish-speaking patients seen in the treatment arm were provided with the services of a professionally-trained medical interpreter to facilitate communication between the patient and emergency department staff
Control, Usual Language Services
NO INTERVENTIONPatients randomized to the control arm receive the services of the emergency departments' usual language services (i.e., a telephone language line or ad hoc interpreters).
Interventions
All treatment interpreters were certified bilingual in Spanish and English and had completed (1) at least 40 hours of training in medical terminology, ethics, patient privacy, and basic interpreting skills; and (2) an online course in protection of human subjects.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- limited English proficient (LEP) Spanish-speaking patients
- adults aged 18 or older
- LEP parents of children seen in emergency departments
You may not qualify if:
- cognitively impaired, comatose, or traumatized patients
- healthy volunteers
- prisoners
- hospital employees
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.lead
- Robert Wood Johnson Foundationcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
CentraState Healthcare System
Freehold, New Jersey, 07728, United States
Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital
New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08901, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Ann D Bagchi, Ph.D.
Mathematica Policy Research
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Stacy Dale, MPA
Mathematica Policy Research
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Robert Eisenstein, MD
University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 28, 2009
First Posted
December 30, 2009
Study Start
October 1, 2008
Primary Completion
April 1, 2009
Study Completion
January 1, 2010
Last Updated
October 1, 2015
Record last verified: 2009-12