NCT01040481

Brief Summary

The main aim of this study is to analyze and report the preliminary and intermediate term outcomes after laparoscopic revision Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery for weight recidivism. The foremost outcome measurements are 1) Fat loss mainly measured as weight loss and expressed as trends in BMI, %EWL, and/or %EBL; 2) Trend in Comorbidity status; and 3) Patient satisfaction and Health-Related Quality of Life "HR-QoL" measured by a standardized, non-validated subjective satisfaction questionnaire and the validated, disease-specific, Moorehead-Ardelt II QoL questionnaires, respectively; 4) Morbidity \& Mortality including nutritional status and metabolic complications. Consequently, secondary objectives of this study are 1) to assess failure rate defined as percentage of excess weight loss \< 50% , lowest BMI \>35 for morbidly obese (MO) or \>40 for superobese (SO), and/or lack of resolution/improvement of major comorbidities at the point in time when assessing preliminary and intermediate results after the surgery under analysis. 2) To evaluate the metabolic and nutritional status by measurements of particular clinical and biochemical parameters. This research is in line with the most current provocative new ideas and recent high impact publications. To the best of our knowledge, this is the very first outcome study of revisional malabsorptive distal gastric bypass surgery by laparoscopy with diverse revisional strategies such as revisional gastroplasty, revisional Fobi-Capella, revisional Adjustable Gastric Band, conversion to distal, and conversion to very, very long limb gastric bypass. Previously, several studies have addressed conversion to malabsorptive gastric bypass after a failed primary proximal gastric bypass but none has addressed the failed distal gastric bypass nor the adequate balance between increasing restriction and malabsorption for decreasing the risk of protein-calorie malnutrition.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
19

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2009

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2009

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2009

Completed
25 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 26, 2009

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 29, 2009

Completed
Last Updated

December 29, 2009

Status Verified

December 1, 2009

First QC Date

December 26, 2009

Last Update Submit

December 26, 2009

Conditions

Keywords

Failed gastric bypassMalabsorptive distal gastric bypassDistal gastric bypassMalabsorptive gastric bypassAdding malabsorptionIncreasing malabsorptionRe-operative bariatric surgeryRevisional bariatric surgeryRevisional gastric bypassReoperationsConversions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Morbidity and mortality

    throughout follow-up

  • Weight loss expressed as Body Mass Index and Percentage excess weight loss

    throughout follow-up

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Traditional outcome measurements

    Variable

  • Remission or improvement of comorbidities

    throughout follow-up

  • Health-related Quality of Life (HR-QoL)

    at last follow-up

  • Subjective Satisfaction

    at the last follow-up

Study Arms (1)

Malabsorptive distal gastric bypass

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients who had either clinically severe obesity (morbid obesity, MO, or super obesity, SO) underwent a primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. The ones that were subsequently revised ending up with an optimized malabsorptive distal gastric bypass were identified from our prospectively maintained bariatric database and included in this study. Specific metabolic and nutritional complications after RYGB surgery were defined according to standard definitions based on signs, symptoms, and laboratory measurements.

You may qualify if:

  • Patients who met NIH criteria for recommendation of a bariatric procedure with the combination of the following characteristics:
  • Failed primary proximal gastric bypass with subsequent revision to a malabsortive distal gastric bypass.
  • Failed primary distal malabsorptive gastric bypass with subsequent revision to increase the restrictive component (revisional: gastroplasty, Fobi, or adjustable gastric band)

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with prior major conversions or revisions.
  • Missing records and/or unreachable patients with scant information for analysis.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

UCSF Fresno Center for Medical Education and Research

Fresno, California, 93701, United States

Location

Related Publications (33)

  • Higa KD, Boone KB, Ho T, Davies OG. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: technique and preliminary results of our first 400 patients. Arch Surg. 2000 Sep;135(9):1029-33; discussion 1033-4. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.135.9.1029.

    PMID: 10982506BACKGROUND
  • Hedley AA, Ogden CL, Johnson CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, Flegal KM. Prevalence of overweight and obesity among US children, adolescents, and adults, 1999-2002. JAMA. 2004 Jun 16;291(23):2847-50. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.23.2847.

    PMID: 15199035BACKGROUND
  • McTigue KM, Harris R, Hemphill B, Lux L, Sutton S, Bunton AJ, Lohr KN. Screening and interventions for obesity in adults: summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Dec 2;139(11):933-49. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-139-11-200312020-00013.

    PMID: 14644897BACKGROUND
  • Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, Jensen MD, Pories W, Fahrbach K, Schoelles K. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004 Oct 13;292(14):1724-37. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.14.1724.

    PMID: 15479938BACKGROUND
  • Christou NV, Sampalis JS, Liberman M, Look D, Auger S, McLean AP, MacLean LD. Surgery decreases long-term mortality, morbidity, and health care use in morbidly obese patients. Ann Surg. 2004 Sep;240(3):416-23; discussion 423-4. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000137343.63376.19.

    PMID: 15319713BACKGROUND
  • Adams TD, Gress RE, Smith SC, Halverson RC, Simper SC, Rosamond WD, Lamonte MJ, Stroup AM, Hunt SC. Long-term mortality after gastric bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2007 Aug 23;357(8):753-61. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa066603.

    PMID: 17715409BACKGROUND
  • Sjostrom L, Narbro K, Sjostrom CD, Karason K, Larsson B, Wedel H, Lystig T, Sullivan M, Bouchard C, Carlsson B, Bengtsson C, Dahlgren S, Gummesson A, Jacobson P, Karlsson J, Lindroos AK, Lonroth H, Naslund I, Olbers T, Stenlof K, Torgerson J, Agren G, Carlsson LM; Swedish Obese Subjects Study. Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in Swedish obese subjects. N Engl J Med. 2007 Aug 23;357(8):741-52. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa066254.

    PMID: 17715408BACKGROUND
  • Cremieux PY, Buchwald H, Shikora SA, Ghosh A, Yang HE, Buessing M. A study on the economic impact of bariatric surgery. Am J Manag Care. 2008 Sep;14(9):589-96.

    PMID: 18778174BACKGROUND
  • Santry HP, Gillen DL, Lauderdale DS. Trends in bariatric surgical procedures. JAMA. 2005 Oct 19;294(15):1909-17. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.15.1909.

    PMID: 16234497BACKGROUND
  • Flum DR, Khan TV, Dellinger EP. Toward the rational and equitable use of bariatric surgery. JAMA. 2007 Sep 26;298(12):1442-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.12.1442. No abstract available.

    PMID: 17895461BACKGROUND
  • Meguid MM, Glade MJ, Middleton FA. Weight regain after Roux-en-Y: a significant 20% complication related to PYY. Nutrition. 2008 Sep;24(9):832-42. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2008.06.027.

    PMID: 18725080BACKGROUND
  • Nguyen NT. Reoperations and revisions in bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc. 2007 Nov;21(11):1907-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9572-6. Epub 2007 Sep 8. No abstract available.

    PMID: 17828427BACKGROUND
  • http://www.asbs.org/htm/Private/resolution.html. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgeons.

    BACKGROUND
  • O'Brien PE, McPhail T, Chaston TB, Dixon JB. Systematic review of medium-term weight loss after bariatric operations. Obes Surg. 2006 Aug;16(8):1032-40. doi: 10.1381/096089206778026316.

    PMID: 16901357BACKGROUND
  • Pories WJ, Swanson MS, MacDonald KG, Long SB, Morris PG, Brown BM, Barakat HA, deRamon RA, Israel G, Dolezal JM, et al. Who would have thought it? An operation proves to be the most effective therapy for adult-onset diabetes mellitus. Ann Surg. 1995 Sep;222(3):339-50; discussion 350-2. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199509000-00011.

    PMID: 7677463BACKGROUND
  • Christou NV, Look D, Maclean LD. Weight gain after short- and long-limb gastric bypass in patients followed for longer than 10 years. Ann Surg. 2006 Nov;244(5):734-40. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000217592.04061.d5.

    PMID: 17060766BACKGROUND
  • Brolin RE. Long limb Roux en Y gastric bypass revisited. Surg Clin North Am. 2005 Aug;85(4):807-17, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2005.03.003.

    PMID: 16061087BACKGROUND
  • MacLean LD, Rhode BM, Nohr CW. Long- or short-limb gastric bypass? J Gastrointest Surg. 2001 Sep-Oct;5(5):525-30. doi: 10.1016/s1091-255x(01)80091-3.

    PMID: 11986004BACKGROUND
  • Choban PS, Flancbaum L. The effect of Roux limb lengths on outcome after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Obes Surg. 2002 Aug;12(4):540-5. doi: 10.1381/096089202762252316.

    PMID: 12194548BACKGROUND
  • Lee S, Sahagian KG, Schriver JP. Relationship between varying Roux limb lengths and weight loss in gastric bypass. Curr Surg. 2006 Jul-Aug;63(4):259-63. doi: 10.1016/j.cursur.2006.05.001.

    PMID: 16843777BACKGROUND
  • Ciovica R, Takata M, Vittinghoff E, Lin F, Posselt AM, Rabl C, Stein HJ, Campos GM. The impact of roux limb length on weight loss after gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2008 Jan;18(1):5-10. doi: 10.1007/s11695-007-9312-y. Epub 2007 Dec 7.

    PMID: 18064526BACKGROUND
  • Bruder SJ, Freeman JB, Brazeau-Gravelle P. Lengthening the Roux-Y Limb Increases Weight Loss after Gastric Bypass: a preliminary report. Obes Surg. 1991 Mar;1(1):73-77. doi: 10.1381/096089291765561501.

    PMID: 10715665BACKGROUND
  • Freeman JB, Kotlarewsky M, Phoenix C. Weight loss after extended gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 1997 Aug;7(4):337-44. doi: 10.1381/096089297765555593.

    PMID: 9730521BACKGROUND
  • Feng JJ, Gagner M, Pomp A, Korgaonkar NM, Jacob BP, Chu CA, Voellinger DC, Quinn T, Herron DM, Inabnet WB. Effect of standard vs extended Roux limb length on weight loss outcomes after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2003 Jul;17(7):1055-60. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8933-4. Epub 2003 May 6.

    PMID: 12728380BACKGROUND
  • Inabnet WB, Quinn T, Gagner M, Urban M, Pomp A. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in patients with BMI <50: a prospective randomized trial comparing short and long limb lengths. Obes Surg. 2005 Jan;15(1):51-7. doi: 10.1381/0960892052993468.

    PMID: 15760498BACKGROUND
  • Torres JC. Why I Prefer Gastric Bypass Distal Roux-en-Y Gastroileostomy. Obes Surg. 1991 Jun;1(2):189-194. doi: 10.1381/096089291765561268.

    PMID: 10775917BACKGROUND
  • Fox SR, Fox KS, Oh KH. The Gastric Bypass for Failed Bariatric Surgical Procedures. Obes Surg. 1996 Apr;6(2):145-150. doi: 10.1381/096089296765557097.

    PMID: 10729855BACKGROUND
  • Sugerman HJ, Kellum JM, DeMaria EJ. Conversion of proximal to distal gastric bypass for failed gastric bypass for superobesity. J Gastrointest Surg. 1997 Nov-Dec;1(6):517-24; discussion 524-6. doi: 10.1016/s1091-255x(97)80067-4.

    PMID: 9834387BACKGROUND
  • Fobi MA, Lee H, Igwe D Jr, Felahy B, James E, Stanczyk M, Tambi J, Eyong P. Revision of failed gastric bypass to distal Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a review of 65 cases. Obes Surg. 2001 Apr;11(2):190-5. doi: 10.1381/096089201321577866.

    PMID: 11355025BACKGROUND
  • Sapala JA, Wood MH, Sapala MA, Schuhknecht MP, Flake TM Jr. The micropouch gastric bypass: technical considerations in primary and revisionary operations. Obes Surg. 2001 Feb;11(1):3-17. doi: 10.1381/096089201321454042.

    PMID: 11361165BACKGROUND
  • Brolin RE, Cody RP. Adding malabsorption for weight loss failure after gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2007 Nov;21(11):1924-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9542-z. Epub 2007 Sep 3.

    PMID: 17768659BACKGROUND
  • Pareja JC, Pilla VF, Callejas-Neto F, Coelho-Neto Jde S, Chaim EA, Magro DO. [Gastric bypass Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy--conversion to distal gastrojejunoileostomy for weight loss failure--experience in 41 patients]. Arq Gastroenterol. 2005 Oct-Dec;42(4):196-200. doi: 10.1590/s0004-28032005000400002. Epub 2006 Jan 19. Portuguese.

    PMID: 16444372BACKGROUND
  • Sarr MG. Reoperative bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc. 2007 Nov;21(11):1909-13. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9536-x. Epub 2007 Aug 19. No abstract available.

    PMID: 17705073BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Obesity

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

OverweightOvernutritionNutrition DisordersNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesBody WeightSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Francisco M Tercero, MD

    Research Associate, University of California San Francisco

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Kelvin D Higa, MD

    Professor of Surgery, University of California San Francisco

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 26, 2009

First Posted

December 29, 2009

Study Start

August 1, 2009

Study Completion

December 1, 2009

Last Updated

December 29, 2009

Record last verified: 2009-12

Locations