Influence of Food-intake on Desmopressin Oral Tablets and MELT-formulation
TM
Influence of Food-intake on Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Parameters of Desmopressin Oral Tablet Formulation, in Comparison With Desmopressin MELT Formulation
1 other identifier
interventional
24
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Alarm-treatment as well as Desmopressin, a synthetic analogue of human vasopressin, are considered the only evidence-based medicine (EBM) IA treatments in monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis (MNE). Desmopressin exists in three different formulations for ambulant use: nasal spray, tablet and lyophilisate (MELT) each with differences in bioavailability (spray 2%, tablet 0.2%, MELT 0.5%). There 's insufficient evidence to confirm the actually used bioequivalent doses ( 10µg spray = 120µg MELT= 0.2mg tablet). Although so frequently used, very few pharmacokinetic and -dynamic data on desmopressin are available for children. Due to prolonged half life, associated with waterintoxication,the nasal spray has a black box warning from the FDA and is no longer recommended . For some authors oral formulations appear to be a safer alternative. However, based on clinical experience of less response rate with oral formulations, lower biodisponibility is suspected. Adult research confirms low bioavailability of tablets but also show major influences by food-intake and changes in gastro-intestinal motility. To achieve maximum efficacy, recommendations are to take desmopressin tablet 1 hour before bedtime and 2 hours after meal: this is unrealistic in schoolaged children since there never is 3 hours between evening meal and bedtime. In 2005 a dose response study demonstrated superior pharmaco-kinetic and dynamic properties for desmopressin Lyophilisate MELT formula. Since these results implicate superior action of MELT, often a change to MELT is recommended if there is a suboptimal response with tablet: sublingual absorption would eliminate the influence of food-intake. However, for this statement there's no evidence, since these tests were all conducted in children in fasting condition. Only one clinical study demonstrates bioequivalence for MELT and tablet. Hypothesis is that desmopressin MELT formulation has a better bioavailability when administered together with meal due to its sublingual absorption.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Dec 2009
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 17, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 21, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2010
CompletedFebruary 6, 2019
February 1, 2019
4 months
December 17, 2009
February 4, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Bioavailability of desmopressine MELT and tablet when taken with meal.
at 1h, 2h and 6h post adminstration
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic for desmopressine MELT and tablet.
at 1h, 2h, 3h, 6h and 8h post administration
Study Arms (2)
desmopressin tablet
ACTIVE COMPARATORdesmopressin MELT-formulation
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Administration of desmopressine MELT formulation
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- children aged 6-16 years old
- with MNE and nocturnal polyuria
- treated with desmopressin tablet, non or partial responders, for whom change to MELT formulation is indicated according to the international standard guidelines.
You may not qualify if:
- history of urologic disease, diurnal urinary incontinence, diabetes insipidus, urinary tract infection, clinically significant disease
- No systemic use of antibiotics, diuretics, other medication that influences urinary concentrating mechanism
- abnormalities of oral mucosa which could influence drugrelease or absorption
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Hospital Ghent
Ghent, 9000, Belgium
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Johan Vande Walle, MD, PhD
University Hospital Ghent, department of pediatric nephrology
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 17, 2009
First Posted
December 21, 2009
Study Start
December 1, 2009
Primary Completion
April 1, 2010
Study Completion
April 1, 2010
Last Updated
February 6, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-02