NCT01035944

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if the use of HemCon chitosan-based dressings is effective to facilitate safe, effective debridement of chronic wounds in the operating room and inpatient ward settings and to minimize bacterial re-colonization of wounds.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
37

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2010

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 17, 2009

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 21, 2009

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2010

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2012

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2012

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

June 9, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

July 1, 2014

Status Verified

May 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

2.1 years

First QC Date

December 17, 2009

Results QC Date

May 12, 2014

Last Update Submit

June 20, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

Chronic woundsChronic wound debridementDebridementBedside debridementSurgical debridementWound debridementMinimize bacterial re-colonization of woundsHemCon ChitoGauze DressingsHemCon DressingsChitosan-based dressings

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Demonstrate That Debridements Using HemCon Dressings at Bedside Can be Performed Safely Without Excessive Bleeding; Compare Levels of Bacterial Load Between Debrided Wounds Treated With HemCon Dressings vs. Wounds Treated With Gauze & Saline Dressings.

    2 days and 5 days after debridement.

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Determine Cost Efficacy, Hemostasis and Patient Comfort Between Wounds Debrided at Bedside With HemCon Dressings & Wounds Debrided in Operating Room Setting.

    2 days and 5 days after debridement.

Study Arms (4)

HemCon Operating Room

EXPERIMENTAL

The HemCon dressing is the intervention for the HemCon Operating Room arm. The first sub-study will evaluate the use of HemCon dressings in the operating room setting. 20 patients will be treated with HemCon dressings following a debridement, and 20 patients will be treated with gauze dressings following a debridement.

Device: HemCon Dressings and HemCon ChitoGauze; chitosan-based.

Control Operating Room

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The first sub-study will evaluate the use of HemCon dressings in the operating room setting. 20 patients will be treated with HemCon dressings following a debridement, and 20 patients will be treated with gauze dressings following a debridement.

Device: Gauze and saline dressings.

HemCon Bedside

EXPERIMENTAL

The intervention for the HemCon Beside arm is the HemCon Dressing. The other sub-study will evaluate the use of HemCon dressings compared to control dressings in bedside debridement. In this sub-study, 20 patients will be treated with HemCon dressings following a debridement, and 20 patients will be treated with gauze dressings following a debridement.

Device: HemCon Dressings and HemCon ChitoGauze; chitosan-based.

Control Bedside.

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The other sub-study will evaluate the use of HemCon dressings compared to control dressings in bedside debridement. In this sub-study, 20 patients will be treated with HemCon dressings following a debridement, and 20 patients will be treated with gauze dressings following a debridement.

Device: Gauze and saline dressings.

Interventions

Perform debridement of chronic wounds using HemCon chitosan-based dressings and HemCon ChitoGauze both at bedside and in the Operating Room (OR) settings. Control for both settings will be gauze and saline dressings.

Also known as: HemCon Dressings, HemCon ChitoGauze.
HemCon BedsideHemCon Operating Room

Control for both settings will be gauze and saline dressings.

Control Bedside.Control Operating Room

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age \> 18 years and are able to provide written informed consent.
  • Have a wound on their body with an eschar and/or significant slough present
  • Documented laboratory studies and coagulation profiles prior to the debridement (including hematocrit, hemoglobin, white blood count, total lymphocyte count, albumin, pre-albumin, HbA1C in patients with diabetes)
  • Subjects with a hemoglobin \< 9 g/dL must have one unit of blood typed and cross matched prior to the debridement; all other subjects must have an active type and screen performed prior to the debridement procedure.
  • Subjects must be willing to consent to a blood transfusion in the rare event that a transfusion is necessary.
  • Must be expected to be inpatients for at least 5 days following debridement, to enable controlled dressing changes by the service.
  • Female subjects of childbearing age must not be pregnant, and must consent to utilize an appropriate method of contraception during the course of the study.
  • For subjects that are to undergo a debridement in the operating room:
  • Subjects must be sensate or have wounds that are sufficiently large to warrant a debridement in the OR
  • Wounds must require more than a simple eschar removal, or must be extensive enough that an operating room debridement would be more appropriate.
  • Subjects must be candidates for regional or general anesthesia, unless the wound occurs in an insensate body part (for example, a pressure sore in a paraplegic or quadriplegic patient, or a diabetic foot ulcer in a patient with a dense diabetic polyneuropathy).
  • For subjects that are to undergo a debridement in the bedside setting:
  • The part of the wound that is to be debrided must be mostly an eschar and necrotic tissue which is not likely to have significant bleeding.
  • Subjects must be insensate, or the wound must be less than 50 cm2 such that the use of local anesthesia in the wound can be undertaken.

You may not qualify if:

  • Pre-debridement hemoglobin level \< 7.0 g/dL
  • Not candidates for or refuse blood transfusions
  • Unable to provide written informed consent
  • Subjects with sensitivity to chitosan or the gauze dressings used in this study, or any local anesthetic needed for a debridement
  • Subjects who are in the intensive care unit
  • Subjects who, in the opinion of the Investigator, may not complete the study for any reason.
  • Have grossly infected wounds that may reasonably be expected to require multiple debridement procedures prior to clearance of bacteria and nonviable tissue from the wound.
  • For wounds situated in the lower extremity, leg must have either palpable pulses or else an ABI \> 0.4

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Northwestern University

Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States

Location

Limitations and Caveats

Early termination of the study; unable to reach enrollment milestones. No outcome measure data was analyzed; zero participants were analyzed.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Jody Oyama
Organization
HemCon Medical Technolgoies

Study Officials

  • Robert D. Galiano, M.D.

    Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Division of Plastic Surgery

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
LTE60
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 17, 2009

First Posted

December 21, 2009

Study Start

February 1, 2010

Primary Completion

March 1, 2012

Study Completion

March 1, 2012

Last Updated

July 1, 2014

Results First Posted

June 9, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-05

Locations