Bilateral Lateral Rectus Recession Versus Unilateral Recess-Resect for Intermittent Exotropia
IXT1
A Randomized Trial of Bilateral Lateral Rectus Recession Versus Unilateral Lateral Rectus Recession With Medial Rectus Resection for Intermittent Exotropia
2 other identifiers
interventional
197
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of bilateral lateral rectus muscle recession versus unilateral lateral rectus recession with medial rectus resection procedures for the treatment of basic type and pseudo divergence excess type intermittent exotropia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2010
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 11, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 15, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 9, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 7, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 18, 2022
CompletedFebruary 7, 2024
February 1, 2024
6.7 years
December 11, 2009
March 1, 2019
February 5, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With Suboptimal Surgical Outcome as Assessed by Motor Alignment and Stereoacuity at Near by 3 Years
A participant's intermittent exotropia (IXT) was considered to be a suboptimal surgical outcome if at any visit occurring 6 months or later, ANY of the following criteria are present by masked examiner testing: 1. Exotropia at distance OR near at any time during the exam (i.e., can be constant or intermittent; determined by a cover/uncover test) with a magnitude of ≥10Δ by SPCT, confirmed by a retest 2. Constant esotropia at distance OR near (determined by at least 3 cover/uncover tests-one must be before any dissociation) with a magnitude of ≥6Δ by SPCT, confirmed by a retest 3. Decrease in Randot Preschool near stereoacuity ≥2 octaves (≥0.6 log arcsec) from enrollment, or to nil, confirmed by a retest Participants who underwent reoperation (or treatment with botulinum toxin) without first meeting any of the above suboptimal surgical outcome criteria were also counted as suboptimal surgical outcomes in the primary analysis.
3 years
Secondary Outcomes (25)
Patients With Exotropia by 3 Years
Enrollment to 3 years
Patients With Constant Esotropia by 3 Years
Enrollment to 3 years
Number of Participants With Stereo Loss by 3 Years
Enrollment to 3 years
Number of Participants With Exotropia Control at Distance at 3 Years
3 years after enrollment
Mean Distance Control at 3 Years
3 years after enrollment
- +20 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Bilateral lateral rectus recession
ACTIVE COMPARATORBilateral lateral rectus recession surgery
Unilateral lateral rectus recession
ACTIVE COMPARATORUnilateral lateral rectus recession w/ medial rectus resection surgery
Interventions
Bilateral lateral rectus recession surgery
A unilateral lateral rectus recession combined with a medial rectus resection in the same eye. Choice of eye at investigator discretion based on any interocular difference, position under anesthesia, fixation preference, or forced duction testing. Reason for choice of eye will be recorded.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 3 to \< 11 years
- Intermittent exotropia (manifest deviation) meeting all of the following:
- Intermittent exotropia at distance OR constant exotropia at distance and either intermittent exotropia or exophoria at near
- Largest exodeviation at either distance, near OR remote distance between 15 and 50 prism diopters (PD) (inclusive) by prism and alternate cover test (PACT)
- Exodeviation at least 15 PD at distance and near by PACT
- Basic type or pseudo divergence excess type
- Stereoacuity of 400 arcsec or better at near by Preschool Randot stereotest (better of 2 measures)
- Visual acuity in the worse eye at least 0.3 logMAR (20/40 on ATS HOTV or 70 letters on E-ETDRS)
- No interocular difference of visual acuity more than 0.2 logMAR (2 lines on ATS HOTV or 10 letters on E-ETDRS testing)
- Absence of high AC/A ratio (exclude \> 6:1)
- No previous intraocular surgery, strabismus surgery, or botulinum toxin treatment
- Investigator planning to perform surgery for correction of IXT
- No hyperopia greater than +3.50 D spherical equivalent (SE) in either eye
You may not qualify if:
- Coexisting vertical deviation, oblique muscle dysfunction, dissociated vertical deviation (DVD), or A or V pattern, any of which the investigator plans to address with vertical transposition of horizontal rectus muscles, oblique surgery, or vertical rectus muscle surgery, i.e., only small vertical deviations, oblique muscle dysfunction, DVD, and A or V patterns not requiring surgery are allowed
- Limitation of ocular rotations due to restrictive or paretic strabismus
- Craniofacial malformations affecting the orbits
- Interocular visual acuity difference of more than 0.2 logMAR (2 lines on ATS HOTV for patients 3 to \< 7 years old or 10 letters on E-ETDRS for patients ≥ 7 years old) and/or investigator plans to initiate amblyopia treatment at this time.
- High AC/A ratio (exclude \> 6:1 by gradient method)
- Prior strabismus surgery or botulinum toxin injection
- Ocular disorders that would reduce visual acuity (except refractive error)
- Prior intraocular or refractive surgery
- Significant neurological impairment such as cerebral palsy. Patients with mild speech and/or learning disabilities are eligible.
- Investigator planning to change refractive correction at this time (if the patient is otherwise eligible, the investigator should consider prescribing refractive correction and bringing the patient back at a later time for enrollment).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Jaeb Center for Health Researchlead
- Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Groupcollaborator
- National Eye Institute (NEI)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Vanderbilt Children's Hospital
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232-8808, United States
Related Publications (5)
Repka MX, Chandler DL, Holmes JM, Donahue SP, Hoover DL, Mohney BG, Phillips PH, Stout AU, Ticho BH, Wallace DK; Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. The Relationship of Age and Other Baseline Factors to Outcome of Initial Surgery for Intermittent Exotropia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2020 Apr;212:153-161. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.12.008. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
PMID: 31862447BACKGROUNDPediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group; Writing Committee; Donahue SP, Chandler DL, Holmes JM, Arthur BW, Paysse EA, Wallace DK, Petersen DB, Melia BM, Kraker RT, Miller AM. A Randomized Trial Comparing Bilateral Lateral Rectus Recession versus Unilateral Recess and Resect for Basic-Type Intermittent Exotropia. Ophthalmology. 2019 Feb;126(2):305-317. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.08.034. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
PMID: 30189281RESULTHolmes JM, Hercinovic A, Melia BM, Leske DA, Hatt SR, Chandler DL, Dean TW, Kraker RT, Enyedi LB, Wallace DK, Donahue SP, Cotter SA; Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. Improvement in health-related quality of life following strabismus surgery for children with intermittent exotropia. J AAPOS. 2021 Apr;25(2):82.e1-82.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2020.11.021. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
PMID: 33905836RESULTDonahue SP, Chandler DL, Wu R, Marsh JD, Law C, Areaux RG Jr, Ghasia FF, Li Z, Kraker RT, Cotter SA, Holmes JM; Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. Eight-Year Outcomes of Bilateral Lateral Rectus Recessions versus Unilateral Recession-Resection in Childhood Basic-Type Intermittent Exotropia. Ophthalmology. 2024 Jan;131(1):98-106. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2023.09.004. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
PMID: 37696452RESULTPang Y, Gnanaraj L, Gayleard J, Han G, Hatt SR. Interventions for intermittent exotropia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 13;9(9):CD003737. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003737.pub4.
PMID: 34516656DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Raymond Kraker, M.S.P.H., Director of PEDIG Coordinating Center
- Organization
- Jaeb Center for Health Research
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Sean P Donahue, M.D., Ph.D.
Pediatric Ophthalmology Service, Vanderbilt Children's Hospital, Nashville, TN
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 11, 2009
First Posted
December 15, 2009
Study Start
June 1, 2010
Primary Completion
February 9, 2017
Study Completion
February 18, 2022
Last Updated
February 7, 2024
Results First Posted
May 7, 2019
Record last verified: 2024-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Time Frame
- Data will be made available after publication of each primary manuscript.
- Access Criteria
- Users accessing the data must enter an email address.
In accordance with the NIH data sharing policy, a de-identified database is placed in the public domain on the PEDIG public website after the completion of each protocol and publication of the primary manuscript.