Refinement of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) Via Cognitive Interviewing and Usability Testing
2 other identifiers
observational
1,448
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Background:
- Currently, National Cancer Institute treatment trials use clinical staff reporting to monitor adverse side effects. The clinical staff reports draw on items from the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE).
- Several of the items in the CTCAE can be adapted for use in patient self-reporting of side effects. Researchers are interested in developing a patient-reported outcome (PRO) approach to the CTCAE. Objectives:
- To develop questions that can be used to create a patient-reported outcome version of the CTCAE (PRO-CTCAE).
- To evaluate patient comprehension of and test the usefulness of the PRO-CTCAE questions among diverse groups of patients. Eligibility:
- Individuals 18 years of age and older who are receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy as cancer treatment.
- Participants must be able to speak and understand English. Design:
- Researchers will conduct up to three rounds of interviews with patients currently receiving chemotherapy or radiation therapy treatments for cancer.
- Participants will be recruited independently from four different clinical treatment sites. At least 25 percent of patients will have an educational attainment of high school or less.
- Each patient will complete a two-part protocol, including a set of PROs that will be followed by a series of questions to evaluate patient comprehension, memory, perceived clarity, and judgment of the PROs.
- The research will be completed in approximately 1 hour, and participants will receive a small amount of compensation for their time and participation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Nov 2009
Longer than P75 for all trials
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 19, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 11, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 14, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 16, 2020
CompletedJuly 17, 2020
July 1, 2020
2.5 years
December 11, 2009
July 16, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Evaluate patients understanding of measurement tool items
Patient report of symptom experience
Study completion
Evaluate the usability of the technology interface for collecting the PRO data of the PRO-CTCAE system
Patient report of technology usability
Study completion
Eligibility Criteria
Cancer patients receiving chemotherapy or radiation treatment.@@@
You may qualify if:
- Age greater than or equal to18 years.
- Disease and treatment matching 1 of the 6 following cohorts:
- Cohort Breast: Breast cancer patients initiiating chemotherapy within the next 7 days or currently receiving chemotherapy.
- Cohort Lymphoma/Myeloma: Lymphoma/myeloma cancer patients initiating chemotherapy within the next 7 days or currently receiving chemotherapy.
- Cohort Prostate/Bladder: Metastatic prostate or bladder cancer patients initiating chemotherapy within the next 7 days or currently receiving chemotherapy.
- Cohort Lung: Metastatic or locally advanced lung cancer patients EITHER:
- initiating chemotherapy within the next 7 days or currently receiving chemotherapy; OR
- receiving daily radiation therapy for greater than or equal to 21 more days (concurrent chemotherapy allowed).
- Cohort Colorectal: Metastatic colorectal cancer patients initiating chemotherapy within the next 7 days or currently receiving chemotherapy.
- Cohort Head/Neck/Gastroesophageal: Head/neck/gastroesophageal cancer patients receiving daily radiation therapy for greater thanor equal to 21 more days (concurrent chemotherapy allowed).
- Cohort NCCCP: Cancer patients with cancer type NOT matching one of the previous six cohorts listed above and enrolled through an NCCCP site. Patient must be initiating active anti-cancer treatment (chemotherapy, targeted agents/biologics, and/or radiation therapy; hormonal therapy alone is not allowed) within the next 7 days or currently receiving active anti-cancer treatment (chemotherapy, targeted agents/biologics, and/or radiation therapy; hormonal therapy alone is not allowed).
- NOTE: A patient registered through an NCCCP site matching one of the previous six cohorts should be registered through that cohort. Only NCCCP patients NOT matching one of the previous six cohorts should be registered through this cohort.
- Willing to return to registering institution in 1-6 weeks.
- ECOG Performance Status (PS):0-4.
- Ability to understand English and read questions on a computer screen (or listen to questions via headphones and then select responses on a screen).
- +5 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- \- Clinically significant cognitive or memory impairment in the opinion of clinical or research staff.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
New York, New York, 10021, United States
MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77030-4096, United States
Related Publications (5)
Clark MA, Armstrong G, Bonacore L. Measuring sexual orientation and gender expression among middle-aged and older women in a cancer screening study. J Cancer Educ. 2005 Summer;20(2):108-12. doi: 10.1207/s15430154jce2002_12.
PMID: 16083375BACKGROUNDDiefenbach MA, Weinstein ND, O'Reilly J. Scales for assessing perceptions of health hazard susceptibility. Health Educ Res. 1993 Jun;8(2):181-92. doi: 10.1093/her/8.2.181.
PMID: 10148827BACKGROUNDFriedenreich CM, Courneya KS, Bryant HE. Relation between intensity of physical activity and breast cancer risk reduction. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001 Sep;33(9):1538-45. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200109000-00018.
PMID: 11528344BACKGROUNDAtkinson TM, Reeve BB, Dueck AC, Bennett AV, Mendoza TR, Rogak LJ, Basch E, Li Y. Application of a Bayesian graded response model to characterize areas of disagreement between clinician and patient grading of symptomatic adverse events. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2018 Dec 4;2(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s41687-018-0086-x.
PMID: 30515599DERIVEDSchoen MW, Basch E, Hudson LL, Chung AE, Mendoza TR, Mitchell SA, St Germain D, Baumgartner P, Sit L, Rogak LJ, Shouery M, Shalley E, Reeve BB, Fawzy MR, Bhavsar NA, Cleeland C, Schrag D, Dueck AC, Abernethy AP. Software for Administering the National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events: Usability Study. JMIR Hum Factors. 2018 Jul 16;5(3):e10070. doi: 10.2196/10070.
PMID: 30012546DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kathleen Castro, R.N.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- NIH
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 11, 2009
First Posted
December 14, 2009
Study Start
November 19, 2009
Primary Completion
June 1, 2012
Study Completion
July 16, 2020
Last Updated
July 17, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-07