(A Novel Pharmacologic Regime for Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention)
REDUCED
A RandomisED StUdy Comparing Standard Systemic Anticoagulation ThErapy to Low Dose Intracoronary Anticoagulation Therapy for Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
1 other identifier
interventional
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The hypothesis: Low dose intracoronary unfractionated heparin is as effective and safe as standard dose intravenous unfractionated heparin on patients with elective percutaneous coronary intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3 coronary-artery-disease
Started Jun 2009
Shorter than P25 for phase_3 coronary-artery-disease
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 11, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 14, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 10, 2013
CompletedJanuary 30, 2014
December 1, 2013
6 months
December 11, 2009
January 21, 2012
December 24, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Major Adverse Cardiac Events
30 days
Major Adverse Cardiac Event
30 days
Study Arms (2)
Low dose intracoronary heparin
EXPERIMENTALLow dose intracoronary heparin: In this group elective coronary intervention was performed with low dose intracoronary Heparin
Standard treatment arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORStandard treatment arm: In this group elective coronary intervention performed with standard dose intravenous heparin
Interventions
elective coronary intervention
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The patients; who have planned elective PCI and have had written informed consent for participation to study.
- The native coronary artery;
- lesion with narrowing \>=70%,
- lesion without thrombus
- no left main coronary artery (LMCA) lesion
- no chronic total occlusion lesion
You may not qualify if:
- Patients have allergy for acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), Clopidogrel and heparin
- Patients who performed primary PCI
- Patients with acute coronary syndrome
- Patients with have a history of myocardial infarction (MI) for two weeks
- Patients who were use UFH or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) for 24 hours
- Patients on warfarin therapy
- Patients who have bleeding diathesis, or have high risk for bleeding.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Bursa Yüksek İhtisas Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi
Bursa, 16320, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (2)
Stabile E, Nammas W, Salemme L, Sorropago G, Cioppa A, Tesorio T, Ambrosini V, Campopiano E, Popusoi G, Biondi Zoccai G, Rubino P. The CIAO (Coronary Interventions Antiplatelet-based Only) Study: a randomized study comparing standard anticoagulation regimen to absence of anticoagulation for elective percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Oct 14;52(16):1293-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.07.026.
PMID: 18929239BACKGROUNDAri H, Kivac E, Ari S, Emlek N, Cetinkaya S, Celiloglu N, Sarigul OY, Aydin C, Akkaya M, Koca V, Bozat T, Gurdogan M. The REDUCED (a RandomisED stUdy Comparing standard systemic anticoagulation thErapy to low Dose intracoronary anticoagulation therapy for elective percutaneous coronary intervention) trial. A novel pharmacologic regime for elective percutaneous coronary intervention. Acta Cardiol. 2014 Dec;69(6):619-27. doi: 10.1080/ac.69.6.1000004.
PMID: 25643432DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The intraprocedural use of a heparinised flush was not controlled; however, given the maximum amount that was allowed to be used, this is not likely to have significantly affected the activated clotting times. .
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr.Hasan ARI
- Organization
- Bursa Postgraduate Hospital
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Hasan Arı, MD
Bursa Postgraduate Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Bursa Postgraduate Hospital
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 11, 2009
First Posted
December 14, 2009
Study Start
June 1, 2009
Primary Completion
December 1, 2009
Study Completion
June 1, 2010
Last Updated
January 30, 2014
Results First Posted
October 10, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-12