NCT01029431

Brief Summary

The Air-Q® intubating laryngeal airway (Air-Q® ILA) is an extraglottic device specifically engineered for use both as a stand-alone laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and as a rescue device or "Plan B" device in the event of a difficult airway. As with some other types of LMA, it is then possible to insert an endotracheal tube (ETT) through the Air-Q® ILA, either blindly or mounted on a fibreoptic bronchoscope (FOB), to achieve endotracheal intubation. The objective of this study is to compare the Air-Q® ILA's performance to the current best option, the PLMA.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
90

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2009

Typical duration for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2009

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 7, 2009

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 10, 2009

Completed
3.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

June 26, 2017

Status Verified

June 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

3.7 years

First QC Date

December 7, 2009

Last Update Submit

June 22, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

intubating laryngeal airwaypediatric

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Oropharyngeal leak pressure is the most commonly reported primary outcome measure of LMA performance. If fresh gas destined for the lung alveoli leaks around the LMA, inadequate ventilation may result, leading to respiratory acidosis.

    10 minutes

Study Arms (1)

1

EXPERIMENTAL

All subjects will have both Air-Q ILA \& PLMA

Device: AirQ Intubating Laryngeal Airway

Interventions

After induction of anaesthesia in each child, either a PLMA or an Air-Q® ILA of the weight-appropriate size will be inserted \& the evaluation described below will be conducted. The first LMA will then be removed \& the other device inserted \& assessed. The order in which the LMA devices are inserted will be determined using block randomisation, with random block sizes, after recruitment \& before induction of anesthesia. The anesthesiologist will insert the LMAs using the manufacturer's recommended technique, \& inflate the cuff to the manufacturer's recommended intracuff pressure of 60 cm H2O. Intracuff pressure will be measured with a digital pressure cuff monitor.

1

Eligibility Criteria

AgeUp to 16 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may not qualify if:

  • ASA I-III
  • Ideal body weight as determined from weight/height centile curves (\>3rd \& \<97th centiles).
  • Elective surgery
  • Appropriate subject and procedure for airway management by LMA sizes 1, 1.5, 2 or 2.5 (Weight 0-50 kg).
  • ASA status IV-V
  • Emergency surgery
  • Abnormal or contraindicated cervical spine flexion/extension/rotation
  • Contraindication to LMA placement
  • Aspiration risk; gastro-oesophageal reflux disease
  • Clinically significant pulmonary disease
  • Coagulopathy
  • Distorted airway anatomy judged likely to compromise LMA placement
  • Allergy to any LMA components.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

British Columbia Children's Hospital, Department of Anesthesia

Vancouver, British Columbia, V6H 3V4, Canada

Location

Study Officials

  • Simon Whyte, MD

    University of British Columbia

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Stephan Malherbe, MD

    University of British Columbia

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Andrew Morrison, MD

    University of British Columbia

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principle Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 7, 2009

First Posted

December 10, 2009

Study Start

December 1, 2009

Primary Completion

August 1, 2013

Study Completion

August 1, 2013

Last Updated

June 26, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-06

Locations