Veliparib and Temozolomide in Treating Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma
A Randomized Phase I/II Study of ABT-888 in Combination With Temozolomide in Recurrent (Temozolomide Resistant) Glioblastoma
2 other identifiers
interventional
257
1 country
17
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Veliparib may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as temozolomide. work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving veliparib together with temozolomide may kill more tumor cells. PURPOSE: This randomized phase I/II trial is studying the side effects and best dose of giving veliparib together with temozolomide and to see how well it works in treating patients with recurrent glioblastoma.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1
Started Jul 2010
Longer than P75 for phase_1
17 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 3, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 4, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 2, 2017
CompletedJuly 2, 2017
June 1, 2017
3.8 years
December 3, 2009
January 17, 2017
June 2, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Phase 1: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)
Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) = any of the following events within 1st 8 weeks of treatment attributable to study drugs: Any grade (gr) 3/4 thrombocytopenia, gr 4 anemia, gr 3 neutropenia with fever (\>100.4). gr 4 neutropenia lasting \> 7 days; Any non-hematologic (NH) gr 3+ toxicity (TOX), excluding alopecia, despite maximal medical therapy (MLT); NH TOX such as rash, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, mucositis, hypophosphatemia, and hypertension will only be considered DLTs if they remain gr 3+ despite MLT; 2nd occurrence of thromboembolism; Failure to recover from TOX (\<= gr 1) to be eligible for re-treatment with study drugs \<= 14 days of last dose of either drug; Any episode of non-infectious radiologically observed pneumonitis gr 2-4 any duration. Dose level will be considered acceptable if \<= 1 of the 1st 6 eligible patients experiences a DLT. If current level is considered acceptable, dose escalation occurs. Otherwise preceding acceptable dose level will be declared the MTD.
Start of treatment to 8 weeks.
Phase II: 6-month Progression-free Survival (PFS) Rate for Patients With Measurable Disease After Surgery
For patients with measureable disease after surgery: Progression defined as ≥ 25% increase in size of enhancing tumor or any new tumor; or neurologically worse, and steroids stable/increased. Bevacizumab (BEV)-naïve group: p0= 15% as estimate of 6-mo. PFS \[null hypothesis (NH)\], p1= 30%, with a 15% absolute increase \[alternative hypothesis (AH)\]. Error rates of 10% alpha and 10% beta. If \<= 11 patients experience 6-month PFS of the first 53 analyzable patients, then do not reject the null hypothesis that the 6-month PFS rate of experimental arm is less than 15%; BEV-failure group: p0 = 2% as a conservative estimate of 6-month PFS \[NH\], p1 = 15%, with a 13% absolute increase \[AH\]. Using first 26 analyzable subjects for each experimental arm, there is \>= 90% power to detect \>= 15% increase at a significance level of 0.10, using a 1-sided binomial test. If \>= 2 patients (8%) are progression free at 6 mo., then claim this regimen to be promising in the patient group.
Randomization to 6 months.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Phase II: Objective Response (Partial and Complete Response) Rate for Patients With Measurable Disease After Surgery
Analysis occurs after all patients have been on study for at 6 months. (Patients are followed from randomization to death or study termination whichever occurs first.)
Phase II: Overall Survival (OS)
Analysis occurs after all patients have been on study for at 6 months. (Patients are followed from randomization to death or study termination whichever occurs first.)
Study Arms (8)
Phase I: Dose Level 1
EXPERIMENTALABT-888 20 mg x 21 days plus temozolomide 60 mg x 21 days
Phase I: Dose Level 2a
EXPERIMENTALABT-888 40 mg x 21 days plus temozolomide 60 mg x 21 days
Phase I: Dose Level 2b
EXPERIMENTALABT-888 20 mg x 21 days plus temozolomide 75 mg x 21 days
Phase I: Dose Level 3
EXPERIMENTALABT-888 40 mg x 21 days plus temozolomide 75 mg x 21 days
Phase II: Arm 1/BEV-NAIVE
EXPERIMENTALABT-888 40 mg x 21 days plus temozolomide 75 mg x 21 days
Phase II: Arm 2/BEV-NAIVE
EXPERIMENTALABT-888 40 mg x 5 days plus temozolomide 150 mg x 5 days
Phase II: Arm 1/BEV-FAILURE
EXPERIMENTALABT-888 40 mg x 21 days plus temozolomide 75 mg x 21 days
Phase II: Arm 2/BEV-FAILURE
EXPERIMENTALABT-888 40 mg x 5 days plus temozolomide 150 mg x 5 days
Interventions
Temozolomide 60 mg/m2 x 21 days, with a 28-day cycle. Treatment will continue until progressive disease unless toxicity or the discretion of the treating physician precludes further therapy.
Temozolomide 75 mg/m2 x 21 days, with a 28-day cycle. Treatment will continue until progressive disease unless toxicity or the discretion of the treating physician precludes further therapy.
20 mg bid x 21 days, with a 28-day cycle. Treatment will continue until progressive disease unless toxicity or the discretion of the treating physician precludes further therapy.
40 mg bid x 21 days/28-day cycle. Treatment continues until progressive disease unless toxicity or the discretion of the treating physician preclude further therapy
150 mg/m2 x 5 days (up to 200 mg/m2 after 2nd cycle)\*, with a 28-day cycle; dose reduction to 125 mg/m2 if necessary. Treatment continues until progressive disease unless toxicity or the discretion of the treating physician preclude
40 mg bid x 5 days/28-day cycle. Treatment continues until progressive disease unless toxicity or the discretion of the treating physician preclude
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Radiation Therapy Oncology Grouplead
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)collaborator
- NRG Oncologycollaborator
Study Sites (17)
Rebecca and John Moores UCSD Cancer Center
La Jolla, California, 92093-0658, United States
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90048, United States
Cancer Research Center of Hawaii
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96813, United States
Queen's Cancer Institute at Queen's Medical Center
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96813, United States
Hawaii Medical Center - East
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96817, United States
Leeward Radiation Oncology
‘Ewa Beach, Hawaii, 96706, United States
University of Chicago Cancer Research Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60637-1470, United States
CCOP - Kansas City
Prairie Village, Kansas, 66208, United States
Central Baptist Hospital
Lexington, Kentucky, 40503-9985, United States
Louisville Oncology at Norton Cancer Institute - Louisville
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202, United States
Regional Cancer Center at Singing River Hospital
Pascagoula, Mississippi, 39581, United States
Renown Institute for Cancer at Renown Regional Medical Center
Reno, Nevada, 89502, United States
Norris Cotton Cancer Center at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756-0002, United States
Cancer Institute of New Jersey at UMDNJ - Robert Wood Johnson Medical School
New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08903, United States
Highland Hospital of Rochester
Rochester, New York, 14620, United States
James P. Wilmot Cancer Center at University of Rochester Medical Center
Rochester, New York, 14642, United States
Legacy Good Samaritan Hospital & Comprehensive Cancer Center
Portland, Oregon, 97210, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Wendy Seiferheld, M.S.
- Organization
- NRG Oncology
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
H. Ian Robins, MD, PhD
University of Wisconsin, Madison
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mark R Gilbert, MD
National Cancer Institute/National Institutes of Health
- STUDY CHAIR
Arnab Chakravarti, MD
Arthur G. James Comprehensive Cancer Center and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Ohio State University Medical School
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- NETWORK
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 3, 2009
First Posted
December 4, 2009
Study Start
July 1, 2010
Primary Completion
May 1, 2014
Study Completion
December 1, 2016
Last Updated
July 2, 2017
Results First Posted
July 2, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share