Evaluation of the Benefits of Glucose Drinks During Childbirth
SOLISO
Randomized Control Study : Evaluation of the Benefits of Glucose Drinks During Childbirth
1 other identifier
interventional
4,142
1 country
9
Brief Summary
Fear of full stomach when emergency general anaesthesia is required is the origin of fastening when giving birth. This behaviour does not warranty perfect security for the general anaesthesia. In addition, well being for women and new born is affected. Giving birth is finally compared to a sportive competition with high-energy needs. As Intravenous energy intake is not regulated by physiologic digestion, it can induce metabolic disorders for the mother that can be amplified for the foetus. Oral glucose drinks could offer some benefits:
- gastric acidity would be decreased without significant increase in volumes.
- energy intake would further more active and more efficiency labour
- an increase in foetus well being However, it has never been shown yet that such behaviour could offer those benefits. Also, it seems that there is not more vomiting, but most of the studies compared oral glucose intake to waterborne intake with the same volumes The expected efficacy is a reduction in labour duration and a reduction in percentage of extraction. Previous studies said that the lack of statistical power due to small number of subjects caused the absence of statistical significant relationship. In addition, even though newborn have less acidosis, there is no clinical relationship proven. The investigators propose a randomised multicentre study to assess efficacy of oral glucose drinks in comparison to traditional fastening when giving birth. Main objective is to significantly reduce instrumental extraction rates. 5400 women will be included in the study in 2 years.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2008
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
9 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 26, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2012
CompletedApril 2, 2026
August 1, 2012
4.5 years
November 26, 2009
March 30, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Instrumental extraction rates
During childbirth
Study Arms (2)
A
ACTIVE COMPARATORGlucose drink
B
NO INTERVENTIONFasting
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age \>= 18 yrs
- Entering for childbirth
- Informed written consent
You may not qualify if:
- more of 8 cm of dilatation
- Caesarean section planned
- natural delivery non-indicated
- pre-partum hemostasis troubles
- salicylic acid or anticoagulant treatment
- pre-eclampsia or HELLP syndrome
- diabetic neuropsy with troubles in gastric emptying
- IMC \> 40 at the end of pregnancy
- understanding of the information
- under guardianship
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (9)
Hospital, Avranches
Avranches, France
Centre Hospitalier
Bayeux, 14400, France
Clinique du Parc
Caen, 14000, France
University Hospital, Caen
Caen, 14033, France
Centre Hospitalier du Rouvray
Elbeuf, 76350, France
University Hospital, Lille
Lille, France
Hospital, Mont Saint Aignan
Mont-Saint-Aignan, France
University Hospital, Rouen
Rouen, France
Centre Hospitalier Mémorial France Etats-Unis
Saint-Lô, 50000, France
Related Publications (1)
Simonet T, Gakuba C, Desmeulles I, Corouge J, Beucher G, Morello R, Gerard JL, Ducloy-Bouthors AS, Dreyfus M, Hanouz JL. Effect of Oral Carbohydrate Intake During Labor on the Rate of Instrumental Vaginal Delivery: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesth Analg. 2020 Jun;130(6):1670-1677. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004515.
PMID: 31702699RESULT
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Thérèse SIMONET, MD
University Hospital, Caen
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 26, 2009
First Posted
December 1, 2009
Study Start
January 1, 2008
Primary Completion
July 1, 2012
Study Completion
July 1, 2012
Last Updated
April 2, 2026
Record last verified: 2012-08