A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Tazarotene Foam, 0.1%, in Subjects With Common Facial Acne - W0260-301
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Vehicle-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Tazarotene Foam, 0.1%, in Subjects With Acne Vulgaris
1 other identifier
interventional
744
2 countries
22
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess safety and efficacy of a new foam formulation of tazarotene in subjects with acne vulgaris.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started Oct 2009
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
22 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 19, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 20, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 6, 2012
CompletedJanuary 18, 2017
November 1, 2016
1.1 years
November 19, 2009
May 31, 2012
November 30, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Absolute Change in Lesion Counts (LCs) From Baseline to Week 12
LC: count of all inflammatory lesions (ILs, i.e., papules, pustules, and nodules) and non-inflammatory lesions (NILs, i.e., open and closed comedones) at Baseline and at Week 12. Total lesions (TLs) were calculated as the sum of ILs and NILs. LC was confined to the face (including forehead, nose, checks, and chin). Change from Baseline at Week 12 was calculated as the value at Week 12 minus the value at Baseline.
Baseline (Week 0/Day 1) and Week 12
Number of Participants With a Minimum 2-grade (G) Improvement in the Investigator Static Global Assessment (ISGA) Score From Baseline at Week 12
Investigators evaluated the acne severity (S) of the participants' face using the ISGA scale, ranging from 0 to 5: 0=clear skin with no ILs or NILs; 1=almost clear: rare NIL with no more than rare papules; 2=mild S: \>G 1, some NILs with no more than a few ILs (papules/pustules only, no nodular lesions \[NLs\]); 3=moderate S: \>G 2, up to many NILs and may have some ILs, but no more than one small NL; 4=severe: greater than G 3, up to many NILs and ILs, but no more than a few NLs; 5=very severe: many NILs and ILs and more than a few NLs, may have cystic lesions.
Baseline (Week 0/Day 1) and Week 12
Number of Participants With an ISGA Score of 0 or 1 at Week 12
Investigators evaluated the acne severity (S) of the participants' face using the ISGA scale, ranging from 0 to 5: 0=clear skin with no ILs or NILs; 1=almost clear: rare NIL with no more than rare papules; 2=mild S: \>G 1, some NILs with no more than a few ILs (papules/pustules only, no nodular lesions \[NLs\]); 3=moderate S: \>G 2, up to many NILs and may have some ILs, but no more than one small NL; 4=severe: greater than G 3, up to many NILs and ILs, but no more than a few NLs; 5=very severe: many NILs and ILs and more than a few NLs, may have cystic lesions.
Week 12
Secondary Outcomes (13)
Percent Change in LC From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Baseline (Week 0/Day 1); Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Absolute Change From Baseline in LC at Weeks 2, 4, and 8
Baseline (Week 0/Day 1); Weeks 2, 4, and 8
Time to a 50 Percent Reduction in Total Lesion Counts (TLC)
Baseline (Week 0/Day 1) to Week 12
Number of Participants With a Minimum 2-grade Improvement in ISGA Score at Weeks 2, 4, and 8
Baseline (Week 0/Day 1); Weeks 2, 4, and 8
Number of Participants With an ISGA Score of 0 or 1 at Weeks 2, 4, and 8
Weeks 2, 4, and 8
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
1
EXPERIMENTALTazarotene foam, 0.1%
2
PLACEBO COMPARATORVehicle Foam
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female age 12 through 45 years, inclusive, who is in good general health.
- An ISGA score of 3 or greater at baseline.
- Lesion counts meeting both of the following criteria:
- Between 25 and 50 facial inflammatory lesions and no more than 1 facial nodular lesion (\<5mm), with NO cystic lesions.
- Between 30 and 125 facial noninflammatory lesions, excluding nasal lesions.
- Regular menstrual cycle prior to study entry for females of childbearing potential.
- Negative urine pregnancy test for females of childbearing potential. • Sexually active females of childbearing potential participating in the study must agree to use a medically acceptable method of contraception while receiving protocol-assigned product. A woman of childbearing potential is defined as one who is biologically capable of becoming pregnant; including perimenopausal women who are less than 2 years from their last menses.
- Women who are not currently sexually active must agree to use medically accepted method of contraception should they become sexually active while participating in the study. Male subjects and/or their partners must use a medically acceptable form of contraception.
- Capable of understanding and willing to provide signed and dated written voluntary informed consent before any protocol specific procedures are performed.
- Ability and willingness to follow all study procedures, attend all scheduled visits, and successfully complete the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Female who is pregnant, trying to become pregnant, or breast feeding.
- Use of topical antibiotics on the face within the past 2 weeks.
- Use of systemic antibiotics for acne treatment within the past 4 weeks.
- Concurrent use of medications known to be photosensitizers (eg, thiazides, tetracyclines) because of the possibility of augmented photosensitivity.
- Use of topical corticosteroids on the face within the past 2 weeks or systemic corticosteroids within the past 4 weeks.
- Use of systemic retinoids (eg, isotretinoin) within the past 6 months.
- Treatment with estrogens, androgens, or anti-androgenic agents for 12 weeks or less immediately prior to study enrollment. Subjects that have been treated with these medications for more than 12 consecutive weeks prior to study enrollment are allowed to enroll as long as they do not expect to change the dose or drug, or to discontinue use during the study and it has not been indicated for the treatment of acne vulgaris.
- Use of topical anti-acne medications (eg, benzoyl peroxide, retinoids, or salicylates) within the past 2 weeks.
- Concomitant use of facial products such as: abradants, facials, peels containing glycolic or other acids, masks, washes or soaps.
- Concomitant use of medications that are reported to exacerbate acne (eg, mega-doses of certain vitamins, haloperidol, and immunosuppressants such as cyclosporine) as these may impact efficacy assessments. Multivitamins, iron supplements, and folate are acceptable.
- Facial procedure (eg, blue light, chemical or laser peel, or microdermabrasion) within the past 4 weeks.
- Require or desire excessive or prolonged exposure to ultraviolet light during the study.
- Known hypersensitivity or previous allergic reaction to any of the active components of the study product.
- A significant medical history of or currently immunocompromised.
- Use of any investigational product within the past 4 weeks or currently participating in another clinical study.
- +3 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Stiefel, a GSK Companylead
- GlaxoSmithKlinecollaborator
Study Sites (22)
Cherry Creek Research, Inc.
Denver, Colorado, 80209, United States
Cosmetic Medicine & Treatment Research Insttitute, Inc.
Miami Beach, Florida, 33140, United States
Dawes Fretzin Clinical Research Group, LLC
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46260, United States
Minnesota Clinical Study Center
Fridley, Minnesota, 55432, United States
Academic Dermatology Associates
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87106, United States
DermResearch Center of New York, Inc.
Stony Brook, New York, 11790, United States
Dermatology Consulting Services
High Point, North Carolina, 27262, United States
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157, United States
The Dermatology Research of Cincinnati
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45220, United States
Group Health Associates
Cincinnatti, Ohio, 45220, United States
Haber Dermatology & Cosmetic Surgery, Inc.
South Euclid, Ohio, 44118, United States
Oregon Dermatology and Research Center
Portland, Oregon, 97210, United States
Yardley Dermatology Associates
Yardley, Pennsylvania, 19067, United States
The Skin Wellness Center, PC
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37922, United States
Dermatology Research Associates, Inc.
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203, United States
DermResearch, Inc.
Austin, Texas, 78759, United States
J & S Studies, Inc.
College Station, Texas, 77845, United States
Dermatology Treatment & Research Center
Dallas, Texas, 75230, United States
Aurora Advanced Healthcare, Inc. Clinical Research Center
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53209, United States
Ultranova Skincare
Barrie, Ontario, L4M 6L2, Canada
Dermatrials Research
Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 1V6, Canada
Nexus Clinical Research
St. John's, NL A1B 3E1, Canada
Related Publications (1)
Feldman SR, Werner CP, Alio Saenz AB. The efficacy and tolerability of tazarotene foam, 0.1%, in the treatment of acne vulgaris in 2 multicenter, randomized, vehicle-controlled, double-blind studies. J Drugs Dermatol. 2013 Apr;12(4):438-46.
PMID: 23652892BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- GSK Response Center
- Organization
- GlaxoSmithKline
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
GSK Clinical Trials
GlaxoSmithKline
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 19, 2009
First Posted
November 20, 2009
Study Start
October 1, 2009
Primary Completion
November 1, 2010
Study Completion
November 1, 2010
Last Updated
January 18, 2017
Results First Posted
July 6, 2012
Record last verified: 2016-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.