New Perspectives in the Rehabilitation of Children With Motor Disorders : the Role of the Mirror Neuron System
Rehabilitation Strategies in Children With Neuro-motor Disorders Due to the Impairment of the Central Nervous System or the Peripheral Nervous System
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Evidence exists that the activation of actions activates the same cortical motor areas that are involved in the performance of the observed actions. The neural substrate for this phenomena is the mirror neuron system. It is generally assumed that mirror neurons have a basic role in understanding the intentions of others and in imitation learning. There is evidence that action observation has a positive effect on rehabilitation of motor disorders after stroke. The aim of this study is to demonstrate that action observation followed by the repetition of the actions previously observed has a positive impact on rehabilitation of the upper limb in children affected by hemiplegia as a consequence of Cerebral Palsy. In particular, the purpose is to assess if mirror neurons could improve the amount, the quality and the velocity of movements and the cooperation between the two upper extremities.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2009
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 18, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 19, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2010
CompletedJune 24, 2014
June 1, 2014
8 months
November 18, 2009
June 23, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Melbourne Assessment of unilateral limb function
T0=baseline, Tend (week three) , T2(two months) T6months (six months after the completion of the training)
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Assisting Hand Assessment
T0, Tend, T2, T6
Jebsen-Taylor
T0, Tend, T2, T6
Abilhand emikids
T0, Tend, T2, T6
Study Arms (2)
Action observation plus repetition
EXPERIMENTALObservation of actions and repetition of the same actions
repetition only
ACTIVE COMPARATORrepetition of gestures
Interventions
15 consecutive sessions of 18 minutes, plus repetition
15 consecutive session of visual games, plus repetition of gestures
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- children with hemiplegia and
- Melbourne assessment \> 50 points
You may not qualify if:
- inability to collaborate
- pharmacoresistant epilepsy
- inability to imitate gestures
- sensitivity disorders
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Stefania Costilead
- University of Parmacollaborator
- IRCCS Fondazione Stella Mariscollaborator
Study Sites (3)
Hospital of Parma
Parma, Parma, 43100, Italy
IRCCS Stella Maris
Pisa, Pisa, Italy
Azienda Santa Maria Nuova -
Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, 42100, Italy
Related Publications (2)
Sgandurra G, Biagi L, Fogassi L, Ferrari A, Sicola E, Guzzetta A, Tosetti M, Cioni G. Reorganization of action observation and sensory-motor networks after action observation therapy in children with congenital hemiplegia: A pilot study. Dev Neurobiol. 2020 Sep;80(9-10):351-360. doi: 10.1002/dneu.22783. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
PMID: 32986904DERIVEDSgandurra G, Ferrari A, Cossu G, Guzzetta A, Biagi L, Tosetti M, Fogassi L, Cioni G. Upper limb children action-observation training (UP-CAT): a randomised controlled trial in hemiplegic cerebral palsy. BMC Neurol. 2011 Jun 28;11:80. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-11-80.
PMID: 21711525DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rizzolatti Giacomo, Professor
University of Parma
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Ferrari Adriano, Professor
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- technician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 18, 2009
First Posted
November 19, 2009
Study Start
September 1, 2009
Primary Completion
May 1, 2010
Study Completion
November 1, 2010
Last Updated
June 24, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-06