Safety and Tolerability of Ertapenem Sodium in the Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infections (0826-055)
A Prospective, Multicenter, Partially-Blinded, Randomized, Comparative Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of INVANZ Versus Ceftriaxone Sodium in the Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infections in Adults
3 other identifiers
interventional
271
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of ertapenem sodium (Invanz) in treatment of complicated urinary tract infections with respect to the proportion of patients with a favorable microbiological response at 5-9 days post therapy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Apr 2008
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 12, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 16, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 1, 2010
CompletedMarch 22, 2017
February 1, 2017
10 months
November 12, 2009
January 19, 2010
February 16, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Microbiological Response Assessment Profile
The difference in favorable microbiological response rates between the 2 treatment groups (MK0826 response rate minus ceftriaxone response rate) was assessed
5 to 9 days post-therapy
The Number of Patients Who Experience Any Drug-related Adverse Experiences Leading to Discontinuation of Parenteral Study Drug and the Number of Patients With Any Drug-related Serious Adverse Experiences (AEs) During Parenteral Treatment
Safety was assessed by statistical and/or clinical review of all safety parameters, including adverse experiences, physical examination, vital signs, and laboratory results during parenteral therapy. As per the primary safety hypothesis, it was expected that, at the end of the parenteral therapy only, MK0826 would be similar to ceftriaxone with respect to the proportion of patients with any drug-related clinical or laboratory adverse experiences leading to discontinuation of study drug and also with respect to the proportion of patients with any serious drug-related adverse experiences.
Adverse experiences that occurred during the study parenteral therapy period were analyzed. The period of parenteral therapy is from 3 days up to 14 days
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Clinical Response Assessment Profile
5 to 9 days post-therapy
Study Arms (2)
ertapenem sodium (MK0826)
EXPERIMENTALertapenem sodium
ceftriaxone sodium
ACTIVE COMPARATORceftriaxone sodium
Interventions
a single daily dose of ertapenem sodium 1.0g IV infused over 30 minutes, for 7-14 days (patients may be switched to oral ciprofloxacin after 3 doses of IV therapy if needed)
a single daily dose of ceftriaxone 2.0g IV infused over 30 minutes, for 7-14 days (patients may be switched to oral ciprofloxacin after 3 doses of IV therapy)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients with a suspected or documented complicated urinary tract infection
- Female patients must test negative for pregnancy and agree to use adequate birth control measures
- Nursing women must agree to defer breastfeeding until 5 days after completion of all study antibiotic therapy
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with complete obstruction of any portion of the urinary tract
- Patients with rapidly progressive or terminal illness
- Renal transplant patients
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (1)
Park DW, Peck KR, Chung MH, Lee JS, Park YS, Kim HY, Lee MS, Kim JY, Yeom JS, Kim MJ. Comparison of ertapenem and ceftriaxone therapy for acute pyelonephritis and other complicated urinary tract infections in Korean adults: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial. J Korean Med Sci. 2012 May;27(5):476-83. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2012.27.5.476. Epub 2012 Apr 25.
PMID: 22563210RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Senior Vice President, Global Clinical Development
- Organization
- Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Medical Monitor
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 12, 2009
First Posted
November 16, 2009
Study Start
April 1, 2008
Primary Completion
February 1, 2009
Study Completion
February 1, 2009
Last Updated
March 22, 2017
Results First Posted
March 1, 2010
Record last verified: 2017-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
http://www.merck.com/clinical-trials/pdf/Merck%20Procedure%20on%20Clinical%20Trial%20Data%20Access%20Final\_Updated%20July\_9\_2014.pdf http://engagezone.msd.com/ds\_documentation.php