Developmental and Augmented Intervention for Facilitating Expressive Language
CCNIA
2 other identifiers
interventional
96
1 country
3
Brief Summary
This study will contrast two experimental treatment conditions by testing whether joint attention/joint engagement intervention using spoken communication (JAE-EMT) results in better outcomes than joint attention/joint engagement intervention that is instead supplemented with an individualized AAC system (JAE-AAC). Thus, the skills of joint attention/joint engagement (JAE) remain foundational to developing expressive language but the difference in the two treatments will be between whether the JAE is administered through the more traditional spoken means (EMT) or through an augmentative and alternative communication device (AAC).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2009
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 12, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 13, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2012
CompletedJune 11, 2024
June 1, 2024
3 years
November 12, 2009
June 10, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of words used spontaneously during language sample
Change in spontaneous language from beginning of treatment, to the mid-point.
3 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Number of words used spontaneously during language sample
6 months
Study Arms (2)
JAE-EMT
EXPERIMENTALThe interventionist will coach the caregiver and child while they engage in play routines established through collaboration between caregiver and interventionist. This intervention condition uses spoken language as the mode of communication. Individual, single word targets will be selected based on the child's level of language production and specific interests. The targets are systematically modeled in response to child actions and attention during play. A sequence of milieu teaching prompts will also be used to elicit targets from the child when use of the target language is functional for the child.
JAE-AAC
EXPERIMENTALThe interventionist will coach the caregiver and child while they engage in play routines established through collaboration between caregiver and interventionist. The mode of communication introduced in this intervention condition is a developmentally chosen augmentative communication device. These devices are provided with a set of individually selected visual-graphic symbols and a relevant lexicon. The use of the device is taught within natural communicative exchanges within play routines and daily activities.
Interventions
The overall goal in each session will be for the caregiver-child dyad to be in a state of supported or coordinated joint engagement. In this state the child is aware of the other's activity, and may actively coordinate their attention between an object/toy and the caregiver. The interventionist will coach the caregiver and child while they engage in play routines established through collaboration between caregiver and interventionist.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of autism from a licensed psychologist or board certified developmental pediatrician, or child and adolescent psychiatrist, confirmed by Module 1 of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (Lord et al., 2001)
- Chronological age between 5 and 8 years
- Classified as nonverbal with fewer than 20 spontaneous expressive words as determined by parent report, language sample, and standardized tests.
- Demonstrated slow or no progress in expressive language acquisition despite at least 2 years of early intervention
You may not qualify if:
- Major medical conditions other than autism, specifically: a) motor disabilities such as cerebral palsy or tuberous sclerosis, b) sensory disabilities such as blindness or deafness, and c) genetic disorders such as Fragile X or Down syndrome.
- Nonverbal mental age \< 24 months, based on a nonverbal score from the Leiter-R (Roid \& Miller, 1997).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Autism Speakslead
- Hugo W. Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger, Inc.collaborator
- Vanderbilt Universitycollaborator
- University of California, Los Angelescollaborator
Study Sites (3)
University of California, Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, 90095, United States
Kennedy Krieger Institute
Baltimore, Maryland, 21211, United States
Vanderbilt University
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203, United States
Related Publications (12)
Kasari C. Assessing change in early intervention programs for children with autism. J Autism Dev Disord. 2002 Oct;32(5):447-61. doi: 10.1023/a:1020546006971.
PMID: 12463519BACKGROUNDKasari C, Paparella T, Freeman S, Jahromi LB. Language outcome in autism: randomized comparison of joint attention and play interventions. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2008 Feb;76(1):125-37. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.76.1.125.
PMID: 18229990BACKGROUNDKasari C, Freeman S, Paparella T. Joint attention and symbolic play in young children with autism: a randomized controlled intervention study. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2006 Jun;47(6):611-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01567.x.
PMID: 16712638BACKGROUNDMillar DC, Light JC, Schlosser RW. The impact of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on the speech production of individuals with developmental disabilities: a research review. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006 Apr;49(2):248-64. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2006/021).
PMID: 16671842BACKGROUNDKaiser AP, Trent JA. Communication intervention for young children with disabilities: Naturalistic approaches to promoting development. In S Odom, R Horner, M Snell & J Blacher (Eds), Handbook of Developmental Disabilities. New York: Guilford Press, 2007.
BACKGROUNDKaiser AP, Hancock TB, Nietfeld, JP. The effects of parent-implemented enhanced milieu teaching on the social communication of children who have autism. Journal of Early Educaiton and Development [Special Issue] 4: 423-446, 2000.
BACKGROUNDLanda R. Early communication development and intervention for children with autism. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2007;13(1):16-25. doi: 10.1002/mrdd.20134.
PMID: 17326115BACKGROUNDHancock TB, Kaiser, AP. Enhanced Milieu Teaching. In R. McCauley & M. Fey (Eds.) Treatment of language disorders in children. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes. 2006.
BACKGROUNDShire SY, Goods K, Shih W, Distefano C, Kaiser A, Wright C, Mathy P, Landa R, Kasari C. Parents' Adoption of Social Communication Intervention Strategies: Families Including Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder Who are Minimally Verbal. J Autism Dev Disord. 2015 Jun;45(6):1712-24. doi: 10.1007/s10803-014-2329-x.
PMID: 25475363RESULTKasari C, Patterson S. Interventions addressing social impairment in autism. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2012 Dec;14(6):713-25. doi: 10.1007/s11920-012-0317-4.
PMID: 23055002RESULTAlmirall D, DiStefano C, Chang YC, Shire S, Kaiser A, Lu X, Nahum-Shani I, Landa R, Mathy P, Kasari C. Longitudinal Effects of Adaptive Interventions With a Speech-Generating Device in Minimally Verbal Children With ASD. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2016 Jul-Aug;45(4):442-56. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2016.1138407. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
PMID: 26954267DERIVEDKasari C, Kaiser A, Goods K, Nietfeld J, Mathy P, Landa R, Murphy S, Almirall D. Communication interventions for minimally verbal children with autism: a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014 Jun;53(6):635-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2014.01.019. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
PMID: 24839882DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Connie Kasari, Ph.D.
University of California, Los Angeles
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator, Professor, Ph.D.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 12, 2009
First Posted
November 13, 2009
Study Start
July 1, 2009
Primary Completion
July 1, 2012
Study Completion
December 1, 2012
Last Updated
June 11, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-06