Safety and Efficacy of Reduced Versus Standard Dose Efavirenz (EFV) Plus Two Nucleotides in Antiretroviral-naïve Adults.
ENCORE1
A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Trial to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Reduced Dose Versus Standard Dose EFV Plus Two Nucleotides (N(t)RTI) in Antiretroviral-naïve HIV-infected Adults Over 96 Weeks
1 other identifier
interventional
636
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Clinical data suggests that the standard dose of the anti-HIV medication, efavirenz (EFV), could be reduced without compromising its effectiveness. Lower drug doses could have fewer side effects and would make EFV more affordable. The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness, over 96 weeks, of standard (600mg) versus reduced dose (400mg) EFV in controlling HIV as part of initial combination antiretroviral therapy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3 hiv-infections
Started Aug 2011
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 9, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 11, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 21, 2020
CompletedFebruary 21, 2020
February 1, 2020
1.8 years
November 9, 2009
February 22, 2018
February 18, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <200 Copies/mL 48 Weeks After Randomisation
Percentage of participants in each of the treatment arms with centrally quantified plasma HIV-1 RNA viral load \<200 copies/mL 48 weeks after randomisation.
48 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <400 Copies/mL and <50 Copies/mL at 48 and 96 Weeks After Randomisation
Baseline and 2 years
Mean Change From Baseline in CD4+ T-cell Count
Baseline and 2 years
Clinical Endpoints: Opportunistic Disease or Death, and Serious Non-AIDS-defining Events and Non-AIDS-related Mortality
up to 2 years
Change From Baseline in Metabolic Endpoints
Baseline and 2 years
Adherence: Median Scores of Self-reported Adherence to Randomised Study Medications
2 years
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
600 milligram (mg) Efavirenz
ACTIVE COMPARATOREligible patients will be centrally randomised to receive tenofovir (TDF) (300mg qd)/emtricitabine (FTC) (200mg qd) + EFV (600mg qd; 3 x 200mg qd)
400mg Efavirenz
EXPERIMENTALEligible patients will be centrally randomised to receive TDF (300mg qd)/FTC (200mg qd) + EFV (400mg qd; 2 x 200mg + 1 x 200mg placebo qd).
Interventions
3 x EFV 200 milligram (mg) tablets once daily
2 x EFV 200 milligram (mg) tablets plus 1x matched EFV placebo tablet once daily
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- HIV-1 positive by licensed diagnostic test
- aged \>16 years of age (or minimum age as determined by local regulations or as legal requirements dictate)
- \< cluster of differentiation (CD)4 \<500 cells/µL
- No prior AIDS-defining illness, using the Center for Diseases Control 1993 Case Definition (except pulmonary tuberculosis)
- HIV RNA ≥1000 copies/mL
- no prior exposure to antiretroviral therapy (ART) (including short course ART for preventing MTCT)
- calculated creatinine clearance (CLCr) more than or equal to 50 mL/min (Cockcroft-Gault formula)
- provision of written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- the following laboratory values:
- absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \<500 cells/μL
- hemoglobin \<7.0 g/dL
- platelet count \<50,000 cells/μL
- alanine aminotransferase and/or aspartate aminotransferase \>5 x upper limit of normal
- pregnant women or nursing mothers
- active opportunistic or malignant disease not under adequate control
- use of immunomodulators within 30 days prior to screening
- use of any prohibited medications
- current alcohol or illicit substance use that might adversely affect study participation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Kirby Institutelead
Study Sites (1)
St Vincent's Hospital
Sydney, New South Wales, 2010, Australia
Related Publications (3)
ENCORE1 Study Group. Efficacy of 400 mg efavirenz versus standard 600 mg dose in HIV-infected, antiretroviral-naive adults (ENCORE1): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2014 Apr 26;383(9927):1474-1482. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62187-X. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
PMID: 24522178RESULTENCORE1 Study Group; Carey D, Puls R, Amin J, Losso M, Phanupak P, Foulkes S, Mohapi L, Crabtree-Ramirez B, Jessen H, Kumar S, Winston A, Lee MP, Belloso W, Cooper DA, Emery S. Efficacy and safety of efavirenz 400 mg daily versus 600 mg daily: 96-week data from the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority ENCORE1 study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015 Jul;15(7):793-802. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)70060-5. Epub 2015 Apr 12.
PMID: 25877963RESULTWinston A, Amin J, Clarke A, Else L, Amara A, Owen A, Barber T, Jessen H, Avihingsanon A, Chetchotisakd P, Khoo S, Cooper DA, Emery S, Puls R; ENCORE Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Substudy Team; ENCORE Cerebrospinal Fluid CSF Substudy Team. Cerebrospinal fluid exposure of efavirenz and its major metabolites when dosed at 400 mg and 600 mg once daily: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Apr 1;60(7):1026-32. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu976. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
PMID: 25501988DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Sean Emery
- Organization
- University of New South Wales
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David Cooper, Professor
Kirby Institute
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 9, 2009
First Posted
November 11, 2009
Study Start
August 1, 2011
Primary Completion
June 1, 2013
Study Completion
August 1, 2014
Last Updated
February 21, 2020
Results First Posted
February 21, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-02