Clinical Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Ciclesonide Hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) Nasal Aerosol for the Treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR) to Mountain Cedar in Subjects 12 Years and Older
A Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group, Phase 3 Clinical Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Ciclesonide HFA Nasal Aerosol (160 μg Once Daily and 80 μg Once Daily) for the Treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR) to Mountain Cedar in Subjects 12 Years and Older
1 other identifier
interventional
671
1 country
7
Brief Summary
This clinical research study will evaluate the safety and effectiveness of two doses of an investigational medication (ciclesonide nasal aerosol) for the treatment of subjects with of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR). The study will consist of a Screening Period to confirm study eligibility, followed by a Single-Blind Placebo Run-in period to acclimate subjects to the proper use of the study medication and to assess the subject's severity of SAR symptoms, followed by a 2-week double-blind treatment period to assess the safety and effectiveness of the study medication when given to eligible subjects.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started Dec 2009
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 6, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 10, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 8, 2012
CompletedJune 13, 2012
June 1, 2012
2 months
November 6, 2009
February 15, 2012
June 8, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change From Baseline in Daily Subject-reported AM and PM Reflective TNSS Averaged Over the Two-week Treatment Period.
TNSS is the sum of individual symptoms of runny nose, sneezing, itchy nose, and nasal congestions. Subjects assess each individual symptoms on a scale of 0-3 where: 0 = absent 1. = mild 2. = moderate 3. = severe Therefore, rTNSS values range from 0-12 (with 0 representing an absence of symptoms and higher scores reflecting more severe symptoms). Reflective TNSS measures these symptoms over the previous 12-hour time interval. Difference was calculated as the two week treatment average - baseline. Greater reductions in the change from baseline score indicate greater improvement.
Week 0-2
Secondary Outcomes (26)
Change From Baseline in Daily Subject-reported AM and PM Instantaneous TNSS Averaged Over the 2-week Treatment Period.
Week 0-2
Change From Baseline in Daily Subject-reported AM and PM Reflective TOSS Averaged Over the 2-week Treatment Period in Subjects With Baseline TOSS ≥5.0
Week 0-2
Change From Baseline in the RQLQ(S) Overall Score at the End of the 2-week Treatment Period in Impaired Subjects With Baseline RQLQ(S) Score of ≥3.0
Week 0-2
Change From Baseline in Daily Subject-reported AM Reflective TNSS Averaged Over the 2-week Treatment Period.
Week 0-2
Change From Baseline in Daily Subject-reported PM Reflective TNSS Averaged Over the 2 Week Treatment Period.
Week 0-2
- +21 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Ciclesonide HFA Nasal Aerosol 160 μg
EXPERIMENTAL160 μg once daily
Ciclesonide HFA Nasal Aerosol 80 μg
EXPERIMENTAL80 μg once daily
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo
Interventions
Ciclesonide HFA Nasal Aerosol 160 μg once daily
Ciclesonide HFA Nasal Aerosol 80 μg once daily
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Give written informed consent, including privacy authorization as well as adherence to concomitant medication withholding periods, prior to participation.
- Subject must be in general good health (defined as the absence of any clinically relevant abnormalities as determined by the Investigator) based on screening physical examination, medical history, and clinical laboratory values (Hematology, Chemistries and Urinalysis). If any of the Hematology, Chemistries, or Urinalysis are not within the clinical laboratory's reference range, then the subject can be included only if the Investigator judges the deviations to be not clinically significant.
- A history of SAR to Mountain Cedar for a minimum of two years immediately preceding the study Screening Visit. The SAR must have been of sufficient severity to have required treatment (either continuous or intermittent) in the past and in the Investigator's judgment (through exposure to allergen) is expected to require treatment throughout the entire study period.
- A demonstrated sensitivity to Mountain Cedar known to induce SAR through a standard skin prick test administered at screening. A positive test is defined as a wheal diameter at least 5 mm larger than the control wheal (normal saline) for the skin prick test.
- Subject, if female 65 years of age or younger, must have a negative serum pregnancy test. Females of childbearing potential must be instructed to and agree to avoid pregnancy during the study and must use an acceptable method of birth control: An oral contraceptive, an intrauterine device (IUD), implantable contraceptive, transdermal or injectable contraceptive for at least 1 month prior to entering the study and will continue its use throughout the study and for thirty days following study participation; Barrier method of contraception, eg, condom and/or diaphragm with spermicide while participating in the study; Abstinence.
- Subject or parent/guardian must possess an educational level and degree of understanding of English that enables them to communicate suitably with the Investigator and study coordinator as well as accurately complete both the AR diary and RQLQ(S).
You may not qualify if:
- Female subject who is pregnant or lactating.
- History of physical findings of nasal pathology, including nasal polyps or other clinically significant respiratory tract malformations; recent nasal biopsy; nasal trauma; nasal ulcers or perforations; or surgery and atrophic rhinitis or rhinitis medicamentosa (all within the last 60 days prior to the Screening Visit).
- Participation in any investigational drug trial within the 30 days preceding the Screening Visit or planned participation in another investigational drug trial at any time during this trial.
- A known hypersensitivity to any corticosteroid or any of the excipients in the formulation of ciclesonide.
- History of a respiratory infection or disorder \[including, but not limited to bronchitis, pneumonia, chronic sinusitis, influenza, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)\] within the 14 days preceding the Screening Visit .
- History of alcohol or drug abuse within two years preceding the Screening Visit.
- History of a positive test for HIV, hepatitis B or hepatitis C.
- Plans to travel outside the study area (the known pollen area for the investigative site) for more than 24 hours during the Run-in period.
- Plans to travel outside the study area (the known pollen area for the investigative site) for 2 or more consecutive days between Randomization Visit and the final Treatment Visit.
- Active asthma requiring treatment with inhaled or systemic corticosteroids and/or routine use of beta-agonists and any controller drugs (eg, theophylline, leukotriene antagonists, etc.); intermittent use (less than or equal to 3 uses per week) of inhaled short acting beta-agonists is acceptable.
- Use of any disallowed concomitant medications within the prescribed (per protocol) time period prior to the Screening Visit and expected use during treatment period.
- Use of antibiotic therapy for acute conditions within 14 days prior to the Screening Visit. Low doses of antibiotics taken for prophylaxis are permitted if the therapy was started prior to the Screening Visit and is expected to continue throughout the trial.
- Previous participation in an intranasal ciclesonide HFA nasal aerosol study.
- Non-vaccinated exposure to or active infection with, chickenpox or measles within the 21 days preceding the Screening Visit.
- Study participation by clinical investigator site employees and/or their immediate relatives.
- +10 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (7)
Allergy and Asthma Associates
Austin, Texas, 78731, United States
Sinus Clinical Research LLC
Austin, Texas, 78759, United States
Central Texas Health Research Corporation
New Braunfels, Texas, 78130, United States
Biogenics Research Institute
San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States
Southwest Allergy and Asthma Research Center, Pa
San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States
Sylvana Research
San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States
Unknown Facility
San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States
Related Publications (1)
Ratner PH, Andrews C, Martin B, Howland W, Desai SY, Huang H, Hinkle J, Bode F. A study of the efficacy and safety of ciclesonide hydrofluoroalkane nasal aerosol in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis from mountain cedar pollen. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2012 Jan-Feb;33(1):27-35. doi: 10.2500/aap.2012.33.3490.
PMID: 22370531RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
This study was not designed or powered for a comparison of the 80mcg dose with the 160mcg dose therefore no statistical comparisons were planned between the two active groups. Publication references to 74 and 148mcg are equivalent to 80 and 160mcg
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Respiratory Medical Director
- Organization
- Sunovion
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 6, 2009
First Posted
November 10, 2009
Study Start
December 1, 2009
Primary Completion
February 1, 2010
Study Completion
February 1, 2010
Last Updated
June 13, 2012
Results First Posted
June 8, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-06