Comparison of the FemoSeal® Arterial Closure Device to Manual Compression After Coronary Angiography
CLOSE-UP I
1 other identifier
interventional
1,005
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Is the FemoSeal® closure device safer and more comfortable than manual compression for femoral artery access closure after coronary angiography?
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Sep 2009
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 16, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 26, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2010
CompletedJanuary 2, 2026
December 1, 2025
1 year
October 16, 2009
December 29, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Rate of ipsilateral palpable groin hematomas with largest diameter exceeding 5 cm.
20 minutes, 1 hour and at discharge, pooled
Secondary Outcomes (13)
Rate of ipsilateral palpable groin hematomas with largest diameter exceeding 5 cm. Patient self-measurements.
14 days
Composite of: major vascular complications necessitating surgical repair, A-V fistulation, pseudoaneurysm needing treatment, major bleeding needing transfusion and infection needing antibiotics .
14 days
Time to hemostasis, from sheath removal to hemostasis is achieved
14 days
Time from end of closure procedure to ambulation. 1h bedrest recommended.
14 days
Device deployment failure
20 minutes
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
FemoSeal®
EXPERIMENTALClosure device for femoral artery access closure
Manual compression
ACTIVE COMPARATORConventional manual compression
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The patient must be at least 18 years old
- Patients undergoing femoral access coronary angiography
- Patient must be competent for providing informed, written consent
- Only 6F sheath
You may not qualify if:
- Percutaneous coronary intervention
- Intra coronary measurements (FFR, IVUS, OCT, NIR)
- Groin hematoma before closure
- Pseudoaneurysm or AV fistula
- Significant stenosis of ilial or femoral artery
- Prior peripheral artery surgery
- INR \> 3,0
- Platelet count \< 120 million per millilitre blood
- Coagulopathy (bleeding disorder)
- Thrombolysis in the last 24h
- Planned heparin infusion after the procedure
- Pregnancy
- Uncontrolled hypertension \> 200 mmHg / 110 mmHg
- Femoral access device closure in the last 30 days
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Aarhus University Hospital Skejbylead
- Vingmed Danmark A/Scollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Aarhus University Hospital Skejby
Aarhus N, 8200, Denmark
Related Publications (2)
Holm NR, Sindberg B, Schou M, Maeng M, Kaltoft A, Bottcher M, Krusell LR, Hjort J, Thuesen L, Terkelsen CJ, Christiansen EH, Botker HE, Kristensen SD, Lassen JF; CLOSE-UP study group. Randomised comparison of manual compression and FemoSeal vascular closure device for closure after femoral artery access coronary angiography: the CLOSure dEvices Used in everyday Practice (CLOSE-UP) study. EuroIntervention. 2014 Jun;10(2):183-90. doi: 10.4244/EIJV10I2A31.
PMID: 24603054DERIVEDSindberg B, Schou M, Hansen L, Christiansen KJ, Jorgensen KS, Soltoft M, Holm NR, Maeng M, Kristensen SD, Lassen JF. Pain and discomfort in closure of femoral access coronary angiography. The CLOSuredEvices Used in everyday Practice (CLOSE-UP) pain sub study. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2014 Jun;13(3):221-6. doi: 10.1177/1474515113482809. Epub 2013 Mar 25.
PMID: 23532433DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Niels R. Holm, MD
Aarhus University Hospital Skejby
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 16, 2009
First Posted
October 26, 2009
Study Start
September 1, 2009
Primary Completion
September 1, 2010
Study Completion
September 1, 2010
Last Updated
January 2, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-12