Conventional Versus Point-of-care Based Coagulation Management
1 other identifier
interventional
200
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to determine the efficacy of two different algorithms for coagulation management in patients undergoing cardiac surgery suffering from increased bleeding tendency. Algorithm 1 is based on conventional coagulation analyses (INR, aPTT, platelet count, fibrinogen concentration,...) and Algorithm 2 is based on thrombelastometry using the ROTEM-device and impedance aggregometry using the Multiplate device.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Jun 2009
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 18, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 19, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2010
CompletedMay 4, 2010
October 1, 2009
10 months
October 18, 2009
May 3, 2010
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
amount of transfused red blood cell concentrates
24 h after begin of surgical intervention
Secondary Outcomes (3)
other transfused blood products including FFP, platelet concentrates and coagulation factor concentrates
24h after surgical intervention
rate of rethoracotomy for bleeding
24h after surgical intervention
ventilation time on ICU
till discharge from ICU
Study Arms (2)
POC algorithm
ACTIVE COMPARATORcardiac surgery patients suffering from increased perioperative bleeding and being treated following Point of Care based algorithm
conventional algorithm
ACTIVE COMPARATORcardiac surgery patients suffering from increased perioperative bleeding and being treated following conventional coagulation management algorithm
Interventions
Patients are randomized to receive either point-of-care based or conventional coagulation measurements based coagulation therapy in the case of increased perioperative bleeding tendency
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age \> 18 years, combined surgical procedures (ACB \& valve surgery), double valve surgery, aortic surgery, Re-Dos
You may not qualify if:
- none
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Goethe Universitylead
- University Hospital, Essencollaborator
Study Sites (2)
University Hospital Essen, Clinic for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
Essen, 45473, Germany
Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Frankfurt, Clinic for Anaesthesiology
Frankfurt am Main, 60590, Germany
Related Publications (4)
Görlinger K, Jambor C, Hanke A, Adamzik M, Hartmann M, Rahe-Meyer N. Thrombelastometry and impedance aggregometry based algorithm for coagulation management in cardiac surgery. Intensive Care Med 33: 196, 2007.
BACKGROUNDGörlinger K, Jambor C, Hanke A, Adamzik M, Hartmann M, Rahe-Meyer N. Perioperative coagulation management and controll of platelet transfusion by point-of-care platelet function analysis. Transfus Med Hemother 34: 396-411, 2007.
BACKGROUNDGörlinger K, Bergmann L, Hartmann M, Marggraf G, Kamler M, Müller-Beißenhirtz H. Reduction of blood transfusion rate by thrombelastometry and impedance aggregometry based point-of-care coagulation management in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. Appl Cardiopulmon Pathophysiol 13: 174-7, 2009.
BACKGROUNDWeber CF, Gorlinger K, Meininger D, Herrmann E, Bingold T, Moritz A, Cohn LH, Zacharowski K. Point-of-care testing: a prospective, randomized clinical trial of efficacy in coagulopathic cardiac surgery patients. Anesthesiology. 2012 Sep;117(3):531-47. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318264c644.
PMID: 22914710DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Christian F Weber, Dr.
Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Frankfurt, Clinic for Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 18, 2009
First Posted
October 19, 2009
Study Start
June 1, 2009
Primary Completion
April 1, 2010
Study Completion
April 1, 2010
Last Updated
May 4, 2010
Record last verified: 2009-10