NCT00991978

Brief Summary

Breast cancer is the most common cause of cancer death among women. Yearly around 12,500 Dutch women are diagnosed with breast cancer and 3,500 die of this disease. One of the problems leading to such striking effect refers to late tumor detection due to inadequate sensitivity of current imaging techniques. Current screening is performed by means of mammography, consisting of traditional film-screen mammograms of digital mammograms. These digital mammograms offer digital enhancement to aid interpretation, which is especially helpful in women with dense breast tissue. Screening mammography is nowadays the single most effective method of early breast cancer detection. For screening of high risk individuals, increasingly the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique is emerging. However, none of the above mentioned techniques has an optimal sensitivity and specificity, leading for instance to a significant portion of false positive results. The clinical consequence of this error is that additional tests and procedures are performed in women who may not have cancer. In the United States, for example, 11% mammograms require additional evaluation; the lesion turns out to be benign in more than 90% of cases \[1\]. False-positive readings False positive readings are more common in younger women, both because the tests are less specific and because breast cancer is less common \[2,3\]. As a result, more follow-up procedures, including invasive procedures such as biopsies, will be done in younger women even though fewer cancers will be found. Furthermore, because breast cancer screening occurs repeatedly, the risk of a false-positive study is likely to rise with repeated screening \[4\]. Emerging adjuncts to mammography include ultrasonography, which is helpful for further assessment of known areas of interest, and magnetic resonance imaging. Image-guided biopsy - directed by ultrasonography or stereotactic mammography views - plays a critical role in histological confirmation of suspected breast cancer.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
23

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for early_phase_1 breast-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2010

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 7, 2009

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 8, 2009

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2010

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2012

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

March 30, 2012

Status Verified

March 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

October 7, 2009

Last Update Submit

March 29, 2012

Conditions

Keywords

breast cancerVEGFScreening

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • SUV in tumour and lymph nodes

    4 days

Study Arms (1)

89Zr-bevacizumab PET

EXPERIMENTAL

89Zr-bevacizumab PET

Other: 89Zr-bevacizumab PET

Interventions

PET-scan with 89Zr-bevacizumab

Also known as: 89Zr-bevacizumab
89Zr-bevacizumab PET

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with a breast tumor size \< 2 cm in diameter (as determined by means of conventional imaging techniques: mammography, ultrasound or MRI) who are scheduled to receive operative intervention either by means of a mastectomy or lumpectomy.
  • histologically proven breast cancer
  • Age \> 18 years.
  • WHO performance status 0-2 (see: appendix B)
  • Signed written informed consent (approved by the Institutional Review Board \[IRB\]/ Independent Ethics Committee \[IEC\]) obtained prior to any study specific screening procedures.
  • Able to comply with the protocol.

You may not qualify if:

  • Other invasive malignancy or condition which could affect compliance with the protocol or interpretation of results.
  • Pregnant or lactating women. Documentation of a negative pregnancy test must be available for pre-menopausal women with intact reproductive organs and for women less than two years after menopause.
  • Prior radiotherapy on the involved area.
  • Major surgery within 28 days before the initiation of the study.
  • Clinically significant cardiovascular disease.
  • Prior allergic reaction to immunoglobulins or immunoglobulin allergy.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Universitar Medical Center Groningen

Groningen, Provincie Groningen, 9713GZ, Netherlands

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Brown ML, Houn F, Sickles EA, Kessler LG. Screening mammography in community practice: positive predictive value of abnormal findings and yield of follow-up diagnostic procedures. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Dec;165(6):1373-7. doi: 10.2214/ajr.165.6.7484568.

    PMID: 7484568BACKGROUND
  • Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, Sickles EA, Eaton A, Ernster V. Positive predictive value of screening mammography by age and family history of breast cancer. JAMA. 1993 Nov 24;270(20):2444-50.

    PMID: 8230621BACKGROUND
  • Lidbrink E, Elfving J, Frisell J, Jonsson E. Neglected aspects of false positive findings of mammography in breast cancer screening: analysis of false positive cases from the Stockholm trial. BMJ. 1996 Feb 3;312(7026):273-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7026.273.

    PMID: 8611781BACKGROUND
  • Eddy DM. Screening for breast cancer. Ann Intern Med. 1989 Sep 1;111(5):389-99. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-111-5-389.

    PMID: 2504094BACKGROUND
  • Sledge GW Jr. VEGF-targeting therapy for breast cancer. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2005 Oct;10(4):319-23. doi: 10.1007/s10911-006-9005-5.

    PMID: 16924373BACKGROUND
  • Kataoka N, Cai Q, Wen W, Shu XO, Jin F, Gao YT, Zheng W. Population-based case-control study of VEGF gene polymorphisms and breast cancer risk among Chinese women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006 Jun;15(6):1148-52. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0871.

    PMID: 16775174BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Breast Neoplasms

Interventions

89Zr-bevacizumab

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsBreast DiseasesSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Study Officials

  • Caroline Schröder, MD PhD

    University Medical Center Groningen

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
early phase 1
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
dr.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 7, 2009

First Posted

October 8, 2009

Study Start

March 1, 2010

Primary Completion

January 1, 2012

Study Completion

January 1, 2012

Last Updated

March 30, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-03

Locations