Study Stopped
Slow recruitment and lack of time to product launch
Comparative Bioavailability of Myfenax® and CellCept® in Kidney Transplant Patients
2 other identifiers
interventional
43
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to further investigate how much of the drug substance "mycophenolate mofetil" can be found in the blood of patients with kidney or renal transplants when treated with Myfenax® or CellCept®. Additionally, the safety and side effects of the two products will be compared. All information already available on these products indicates that the safety profiles of the two products will be the same.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Aug 2009
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 29, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 8, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 30, 2013
CompletedNovember 8, 2018
October 1, 2018
1.2 years
August 29, 2009
May 13, 2013
October 9, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC(0-6h)) of Mycophenolate Mofetil
Area under the plasma concentration-time curve during a dosage interval at steady state (calculated using the trapezoidal rule, from t = 0 to t = 6 hours).
Day 14 and Day 28 (end of first two cross-over periods) before drug administration and at 30 min, 1 hour, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, and 12 hours after drug administration
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC(0-tau)) of Mycophenolate Mofetil
For participants with a 0-12h profile: Area under the plasma concentration-time curve during a dosage interval at steady state (calculated using the trapezoidal rule, from t = 0 to t = 12 hours). For participants with a 0-6h profile: AUC(0-tau) was calculated based on AUC(0-6h) using the extrapolation formula according to Fleming.
Day 14 and Day 28 (end of first two cross-over periods) before drug administration and at 30 min, 1 hour, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, and 12 hours after drug administration
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Mycophenolate Mofetil
Cmax was directly obtained from measured values of plasma concentrations.
Day 14 and Day 28 (end of first two cross-over periods) before drug administration and at 30 min, 1 hour, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, and 12 hours after drug administration
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Minimum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmin) of Mycophenolate Mofetil
Day 14 and Day 28 (end of first two cross-over periods) before drug administration and at 30 min, 1 hour, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, and 12 hours after drug administration
Plasma Concentrations of Mycophenolate Mofetil in Pre-Administration Samples (Cpd)
Day 14 and Day 28 (end of first two cross-over periods) before drug administration
Degree of Fluctuation of the Concentration Levels of Mycophenolate Mofetil Over One Dosing Interval (PTF)
Day 14 and Day 28 (end of first two cross-over periods) before drug administration
Time Corresponding to Occurrence of Cmax (Tmax) of Mycophenolate Mofetil
Day 14 and Day 28 (end of first two cross-over periods) before drug administration
Summary of Participants With Adverse Events
Day 1 up to Day 112
Study Arms (2)
Reference/Test/Test
EXPERIMENTALThe reference product was CellCept® and test product was Myfenax®. In period I, participants received CellCept on Days 1-14. In period II, participants crossed-over to receive Myfenax on Days 15-28. In period III, participants received Myfenax until the end of the study (Days 29-112). Doses of mycophenolate mofetil were at least 500 mg twice daily, morning and evening.
Test/Reference/Reference
EXPERIMENTALThe test product was Myfenax® and the reference product was CellCept®. In period I, participants received Myfenax on Days 1-14. In period II, participants crossed-over to receive CellCept on Days 15-28. In period III, participants received CellCept until the end of the study (Days 29-112). Doses of mycophenolate mofetil were at least 500 mg twice daily, morning and evening.
Interventions
Each participant received at least 500 mg orally, twice daily (morning and evening) during those study periods labeled as 'T' (test drug). Participants receive the dose equivalent to the pre-study dose (within the recommended therapeutic range) of mycophenolate mofetil.
Each participant received at least 500 mg orally, twice daily (morning and evening) during those study periods labeled as 'R' (reference drug). Participants receive the dose equivalent to the pre-study dose (within the recommended therapeutic range) of mycophenolate mofetil.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Renal transplant recipients at least 12 months post-transplantation aged ≥ 18 years.
- Maintenance treatment with mycophenolate mofetil (in combination with tacrolimus with or without corticosteroids).
- Stable dose of mycophenolate mofetil (≥ 500 mg twice daily) with no changes in immunosuppressive regimen for at least 6 weeks prior to the start of the study.
- Stable renal graft function for at least 3 months.
- Female patients must be either post-menopausal for ≥ 1 year, be surgically sterilized or a negative pregnancy test will be required immediately prior to study entry and such patients must continue to use effective contraception.
- Willingness to undergo the study-related procedures.
- Ability to comprehend and willingness to sign informed consent form.
You may not qualify if:
- History of allergy to mycophenolate mofetil, mycophenolic acid or any of the ingredients.
- Multi-organ recipients (e.g., kidney and pancreas) or previous transplant with any organ other than kidney.
- Rejection within the past 6 months prior to the start of the study.
- Severe clinically relevant co-existing disease.
- History of cancer other than skin cancer that has been cured.
- History of serious clinically relevant digestive system disease during the last 12 months prior to start of the study.
- Known or suspected hereditary deficiency of hypoxanthine-guanine-phosphoribosyltransferase (e.g., Lesch-Nyhan syndrome, Kelley-Seegmiller syndrome).
- Known or suspected liver impairment.
- Clinically significant thrombocytopenia, anaemia, leukopenia, or neutropenia
- Clinically significant laboratory and/or physical changes during the last 2 months prior to the start of the study.
- Use of azathioprine, cholestyramine, sevelamer, or probenecid within 2 weeks prior to the first administration of study medication.
- Change in concomitant medication during the 6 weeks prior to start of the study.
- Use of any drug, prescribed or over-the-counter, (except stable concomitant medication) within 2 weeks prior to the first administration of study medication.
- Planned or expected requirement for the use of live attenuated vaccines during the study.
- Positive testing for HIV, Hepatitis B and C.
- +6 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.lead
- Parexelcollaborator
Related Publications (2)
Sunder-Plassmann G et al.: Results of a Comparative Bioavailability Study of Myfenax (Teva) and CellCept (Roche) in Stable Kidney Transplant Recipients. American Transplant Congress 2011. Abstract Number: 250308
RESULTSunder-Plassmann G, Reinke P, Rath T, Wiecek A, Nowicki M, Moore R, Lutz J, Gaggl M, Ferkl M. Comparative pharmacokinetic study of two mycophenolate mofetil formulations in stable kidney transplant recipients. Transpl Int. 2012 Jun;25(6):680-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2012.01475.x. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
PMID: 22500920RESULT
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The study was designed to have a power of at least 80 % to show bioequivalence with 80 subjects. Only 43 subjects were included.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Director, Clinical Research
- Organization
- Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products, R&D Inc.
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gere Sunder-Plassman, Prof.,MD
Medical University Vienna
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 29, 2009
First Posted
October 8, 2009
Study Start
August 1, 2009
Primary Completion
October 1, 2010
Study Completion
October 1, 2010
Last Updated
November 8, 2018
Results First Posted
July 30, 2013
Record last verified: 2018-10