Neural Prostheses and Gait Performance: Model-Based Strategies
1 other identifier
interventional
9
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this research is to find the optimal patterns of functional electrical stimulation (FES) of muscles in the lower legs that will improve walking ability in those who have had a stroke and at the same time ensure walking stability. FES involves applying small electric currents to the nerves, which cause the muscles to contract. FES research projects vary from simple investigations of the therapeutic effects of exercise on muscle function and skin health, to more complex studies of functional movements such as standing or walking.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2009
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 2, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 8, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 9, 2019
CompletedAugust 9, 2019
July 1, 2019
7.3 years
October 2, 2009
June 18, 2019
July 18, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Walking Stability and Speed
This was a feasibility study of computational models and gait simulations to objectively determine patient-specific patterns of muscle activation. We developed computer models and walking simulations of hemiplegic gait from 8 subjects. We related the model results (muscle activations) to the optimized data collected from hemiplegic subjects \& calculated the FES pattern to be delivered in 2 forms (open loop \& foot switch triggered). The primary outcome measure turned out to be the feasibility of the methods because after developing our computer modeling and computational optimization framework we could only test walking with the 2 forms of FES at the same preferred walking speed on a treadmill. Thus, the simulated walking speed and the real walking speed pre and post FES turned out to be the same. Walking stability was measured with variability in work performed at the ankle. The additional volitional and FES biomechanical data that were measured are listed in the secondary measures.
pre-stimulation (volitional) and post-stimulation (FES), day of the study
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Peak Ankle Power
Same day: pre-stimulation (volitional) and post-stimulation (FES), day of the study
Positive Ankle Work
Same day; pre-stimulation (volitional) and post-stimulation (FES), day of the study
The Impulse of the Anterior Ground Reaction Force Normalized by Body Mass.
Same day: pre-stimulation (volitional) and post-stimulation (FES), day of the study
Study Arms (1)
Arm 1: FES
EXPERIMENTALCase-control study: pre- and post-stimulation (FES).
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- This study includes stroke survivors greater than 18 years of age, \>180 days from first clinical hemorrhagic or nonhemorrhagic stroke with:
- Unilateral hemiparesis with sufficient endurance and motor ability to ambulate \>30 feet continuously without an AFO requiring no more than 25% physical help
- Berg Balance Scale score \>23 without assistive devices
- Standing ankle dorsiflexion strength of \<4/5
- Foot-drop during ambulation with gait instability or inefficient gait defined as supervision need
- Possible use of physical assistance or assistive device (cane, walker)
- Evidence of foot-drop as seen by "dragging" or "catching" of affected toes during limb swing or circumducting affected limb
- Vaulting of the unaffected limb or hiking the affected hip to clear toes.
- Intact and electrically ex-citable lower motor neurons
- Ankle dorsiflexion to at least neutral while standing with electrical stimulation of common peroneal and tibial nerves without painful hypersensitivity to stimulation
- Adequate social support and stability
- Medically stable with intact skin in affected lower limb
- Willingness to comply during research procedures
- No systemic co-morbidities
- No history of potentially fatal cardiac arrhythmias i.e. ventricular tachycardia, supraventricular tachycardia and rapid ventricular response atrial fibrillation with hemodynamic instability
- +2 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Requires an ankle foot orthosis (AFO) to prevent knee flexion collapse in stance
- Excessive edema of affected extremity
- Absent sensation in affected limb
- History of potentially fatal cardiac arrhythmias such as ventricular tachycardia, supraventricular tachycardia, and rapid ventricular response, atrial fibrillation with hemodynamic instability
- Demand pacemakers or any implanted electronic systems
- Pregnancy
- Uncontrolled seizure disorder
- Ipsilateral lower limb lower motor neuron lesion
- Parkinson's disease
- Spinal cord injury
- Traumatic brain injury
- Multiple sclerosis
- Ankle plantar flexor contraction
- Severely impaired cognition and communication
- Painful hypersensitivity to neuromuscular stimulation of common peroneal nerve
- +2 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Louis Stokes VA Medical Center, Cleveland, OH
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Elizabeth Hardin
- Organization
- Cleveland VAMC
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Elizabeth C Hardin van den Bogert, PhD MS
Louis Stokes VA Medical Center, Cleveland, OH
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- FED
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 2, 2009
First Posted
October 8, 2009
Study Start
June 1, 2009
Primary Completion
September 1, 2016
Study Completion
November 1, 2016
Last Updated
August 9, 2019
Results First Posted
August 9, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-07