NCT00987285

Brief Summary

This project is primarily a behavioral study. We employed a three-arm, patient-randomized practical effectiveness trial to evaluate the impact of two different interactive, multimedia self-management programs, relative to "enhanced" usual care. The two interventions will be (a) the revised program from our present study, based on our social-ecological theory and the 5 As self-management model, plus enhanced support (ASM+ES) that includes practical, but extensive, ongoing support and b) largely Automated Self-Management (ASM). These programs will be compared to a realistic "enhanced usual care" (UC) condition that will provide health risk appraisal feedback, control for computer interactions, and provide standardized advice on behavior change, but not the hypothesized key intervention processes of goal-setting, barriers identification, problem-solving, or social-environmental support. Patients will be randomized to conditions within clinic and will participate for 1 year. The proposed project will test the effectiveness of a practical, automated-based intervention for primary care patients to facilitate dietary and physical activity practices, and medication-taking. Analyses will focus on primary outcomes of (a) dietary, physical activity, medication-taking outcomes, and (b) the UKPDS risk equation as well as secondary quality-of-life, patient-activation, and patient care outcomes (Specific Aim #2). Using the RE-AIM measures, we will analyze the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance of the intervention programs (Specific Aim #3), and also factors related to program implementation, linkage to primary care, and program success with emphasis on cost, cost-effectiveness, and mediators and moderators of outcomes such as social-environment support (Aim #4). Primary hypotheses:

  1. 1.That the Automated Intervention received by Automated self-management (ASM) condition and ASM plus enhanced support conditions (ASM+ES) will be superior to usual care on the primary outcomes.
  2. 2.That the ASM+ES condition will be superior to the ASM alone condition on primary outcomes at the 12-month follow-up.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
463

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable type-2-diabetes-mellitus

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2007

Longer than P75 for not_applicable type-2-diabetes-mellitus

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2007

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 29, 2009

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 30, 2009

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2011

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

May 25, 2015

Status Verified

May 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

4.9 years

First QC Date

September 29, 2009

Last Update Submit

May 21, 2015

Conditions

Keywords

RE AIM modelType 2 Diabetes MellitusInteractive voice recognitionComputer Assisted Self Management

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Improvement in health behaviors (e.g., dietary patterns, physical activity, medication taking) and biologic outcomes (HbA1c, lipid ratio, blood pressure, and smoking status).

    Baseline, 4 months and 12 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Diabetes-specific quality of life (Diabetes Distress Scale), patient activation (PAM scale), and perceived social-environmental support (the Chronic Illness Resources Survey) at 4- and 12-month follow-ups.

    4 and 12 months

Study Arms (3)

Computer Assisted Self Management plus Social Support

EXPERIMENTAL

an interactive, automated self-management (ASM) program that uses web and interactive voice recognition (IVR) media combined with enhanced support in the form of group Diabetes Care Management visits and live follow up phone calls from Diabetes Care Managers

Behavioral: CASM +

Usual care

NO INTERVENTION

will receive a health-risk appraisal, interactive CD-ROM program that provides standardized advice on behavior change, but not the hypothesized key intervention processes of goal setting, barriers identification, problem solving, or social environmental support.

Computer Assisted Self Management

EXPERIMENTAL

An interactive, automated self-management (ASM) program that uses web and interactive voice recognition (IVR) media.

Behavioral: CASM

Interventions

CASMBEHAVIORAL

Computer Assisted Self Management using and interactive, automated self-management program that uses web and interactive voice recognition (IVR) media

Computer Assisted Self Management

Eligibility Criteria

Age25 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • being 25-75 years of age,
  • live independently,
  • have a telephone,
  • are able to read in either English or Spanish,
  • able to access the Internet at least twice per week
  • are capable of providing informed consent,
  • have been diagnosed with type 2 diabetes for at least 1 year
  • are overweight (BMI ≥ 25), and
  • have at least one additional UKPDS equation risk factor (i.e., high lipids, hypertension, HbA1c, or smoking)

You may not qualify if:

  • Suffering dementia or active psychosis,
  • Being on end-stage dialysis,
  • or predicted to live fewer than 2 years
  • Being institutionalized.
  • Pregnant women - women with gestational diabetes will not be enrolled, because there needs are quite different, but we won't specifically exclude women who are pregnant AND otherwise eligible, since we do acknowledge that it's possible that someone may be unaware that they are pregnant at the time of enrollment, or may become pregnant during the study, and that this will not affect their continued participation.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Kaiser Permanente of Colorado

Denver, Colorado, 80237-8066, United States

Location

Related Publications (7)

  • Glasgow, R.E., Nutting, P.A. (2004) Diabetes. Handbook of Primary Care Psychology. L. Haas (Editor) Oxford University Press, New York, pp 299-319.

    BACKGROUND
  • Glasgow RE, Bull SS, Piette JD, Steiner JF. Interactive behavior change technology. A partial solution to the competing demands of primary care. Am J Prev Med. 2004 Aug;27(2 Suppl):80-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.04.026.

    PMID: 15275676BACKGROUND
  • King, D.K., Glasgow, R.E. (2004) Self-management of Type 2 Diabetes: Key Issues, Evidence-Based Recommendations, and Future Directions. In: Best Practices in the Behavioral Management of Chronic Disease, J. Trafton & William Gordon (Eds.). Institute for Disease Management, Los Altos, CA, Vol 2, Chapter 9.

    BACKGROUND
  • Estabrooks PA, Nelson CC, Xu S, King D, Bayliss EA, Gaglio B, Nutting PA, Glasgow RE. The frequency and behavioral outcomes of goal choices in the self-management of diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2005 May-Jun;31(3):391-400. doi: 10.1177/0145721705276578.

    PMID: 15919639BACKGROUND
  • Glasgow RE, Nelson CC, Strycker LA, King DK. Using RE-AIM metrics to evaluate diabetes self-management support interventions. Am J Prev Med. 2006 Jan;30(1):67-73. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.08.037.

    PMID: 16414426BACKGROUND
  • King DK, Estabrooks PA, Strycker LA, Toobert DJ, Bull SS, Glasgow RE. Outcomes of a multifaceted physical activity regimen as part of a diabetes self-management intervention. Ann Behav Med. 2006 Apr;31(2):128-37. doi: 10.1207/s15324796abm3102_4.

    PMID: 16542127BACKGROUND
  • Glasgow RE, Christiansen SM, Kurz D, King DK, Woolley T, Faber AJ, Estabrooks PA, Strycker L, Toobert D, Dickman J. Engagement in a diabetes self-management website: usage patterns and generalizability of program use. J Med Internet Res. 2011 Jan 25;13(1):e9. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1391.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Diabetes MellitusGlucose Metabolism DisordersMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesEndocrine System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Russell E Glasgow, PhD

    Kaiser Permanente

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 29, 2009

First Posted

September 30, 2009

Study Start

January 1, 2007

Primary Completion

December 1, 2011

Study Completion

December 1, 2014

Last Updated

May 25, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-05

Locations