PEAK PlasmaBlade 4.0 in Bilateral Breast Reduction
PRECISE
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study to Evaluate Use of the PEAK PlasmaBlade 4.0 in Bilateral Breast Reduction
1 other identifier
interventional
45
1 country
7
Brief Summary
The objective of this clinical study is to evaluate the operative performance of the PEAK PlasmaBlade 4.0 during bilateral breast reduction; to monitor and record post-operative pain, adverse events and skin scarring following surgery; and compare these outcomes to the current standard of care (SOC).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2010
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 28, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 30, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 1, 2013
CompletedJanuary 1, 2013
November 1, 2012
1.7 years
September 28, 2009
November 29, 2012
November 29, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Postoperative Pain
The difference in pain was measured by visual analog scale for 24 hours post-operatively and for 10 post-operative days twice daily between the SOC and PlasmaBlade operative sites. Wong-Baker FACES Visual Analog Scale, 0 (no hurt) to 10 (hurts worst). The results represent the mean of each subject's mean pain scores over 10 days.
0 to 10 days postoperative
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Estimated Blood Loss
Intraoperative
Operative Time
Intraoperative
Amount of Tissue Removed
Intraoperative
Dissection Performance
Intraoperative
Study Arms (2)
PlasmaBlade arm
EXPERIMENTALThe PEAK PlasmaBlade will be used for the entirety of the breast reduction, including the skin incision.
Standard of Care
ACTIVE COMPARATORScalpel will be used for the skin incision and traditional electrosurgery for the subcutaneous dissection.
Interventions
The PEAK PlasmaBlade will be used for the entirety of the breast reduction, including the skin incision.
Scalpel will be used for the skin incision and traditional electrosurgery for the subcutaneous dissection.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age between 20 and 60
- Physically healthy, stable weight, non-smoker
- Desiring bilateral breast reduction
- Subject must understand the nature of the procedure and provide written informed consent prior to the procedure.
- Subject must be willing and able to comply with specified follow-up evaluations.
- Female subjects must either be no longer capable of reproduction, or taking acceptable measures to prevent pregnancy during the study, and have a negative pregnancy test prior to participation in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Age younger than 20 or greater than 60 years old
- Anticoagulation therapy which cannot be discontinued
- Smoking (any kind)
- Infection (local or systemic)
- Cognitive impairment or mental illness
- Severe cardiopulmonary deficiencies
- Known coagulopathy
- Immunocompromised
- Prior history of breast cancer
- Kidney disease (any type)
- Currently taking any medication known to affect healing
- Subjects who are status-post gastric banding or gastric bypass
- Currently enrolled in another investigational device or drug trial
- Unable to follow instructions or complete follow-up
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (7)
Providence St. Joseph's
Burbank, California, 91505, United States
Verdugo Hills Hospital
Glendale, California, 91218, United States
El Camino Hospital
Mountain View, California, 94040, United States
Tri-City Medical Center
Oceanside, California, 92056, United States
Sharp Outpatient Pavilion
San Diego, California, 92123, United States
Rancho Bernardo Surgery Center
San Diego, California, 92128, United States
University Hospitals
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Robert Swain, PhD
- Organization
- Medtronic Surgical Technologies
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Abhay Gupta, MD
Gupta Plastic Surgery
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Howard Rosenberg, MD
Accent on Aesthetics Plastic Surgery
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Susan Downey, MD
Susan Downey, MD, FACS
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Larry Pollack, MD
Del Mar Plastic Surgery
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hooman Soltanian, MD
University Hospital Cleveland
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 28, 2009
First Posted
September 30, 2009
Study Start
January 1, 2010
Primary Completion
September 1, 2011
Study Completion
September 1, 2011
Last Updated
January 1, 2013
Results First Posted
January 1, 2013
Record last verified: 2012-11