NCT00981227

Brief Summary

The primary objective of the study is to assess the efficacy of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) as therapy for patients with post-herpetic neuralgia.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
567

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2007

Shorter than P25 for phase_2

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2007

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2009

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2009

Completed
9 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 18, 2009

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 22, 2009

Completed
3.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 3, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

October 29, 2014

Status Verified

October 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

September 18, 2009

Results QC Date

February 7, 2013

Last Update Submit

October 21, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

pain herpetic neuralgia

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in Mean Pain (NRPS) From Baseline to Endpoint in Mean Pain

    The primary efficacy variable will be based upon an 11-point (0-10) Numeric Rating Pain Scale (NRPS), where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst possible pain, to be recorded in a patient's diary upon awakening each morning. This score should reflect the patient's mean pain over the previous 24 hours. Please note that the change from baseline to endpoint in mean pain, i.e. the difference between endpoint mean pain and baseline mean pain, which are defined as follows: * Baseline mean pain is defined as the mean of the last four available ratings of average daily pain (NRPS) in the patient diary performed in the last 7 days before randomisation. * Endpoint mean pain is defined as the mean of the last four available ratings of average daily pain in the patient diary in the last 7 days of the treatment period.

    baseline and 13 weeks

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Change in Mean Pain (NRPS) From Baseline to Endpoint by Total Daily Dose

    baseline and 13 weeks

Study Arms (6)

ESL 400 mg twice-daily

EXPERIMENTAL

ESL 400 mg twice-daily

Drug: Eslicarbazepine acetate

ESL 800 mg once-daily

EXPERIMENTAL

ESL 800 mg once-daily

Drug: Eslicarbazepine acetate

ESL 600 mg twice daily

EXPERIMENTAL

ESL 600 mg twice daily

Drug: Eslicarbazepine acetate

ESL 1200 mg once daily

EXPERIMENTAL

ESL 1200 mg once daily

Drug: Eslicarbazepine acetate

ESL 800 mg twice daily

EXPERIMENTAL

ESL 800 mg twice daily

Drug: Eslicarbazepine acetate

placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

placebo

Drug: Placebo

Interventions

Scored tablets

Also known as: Zebinix
ESL 1200 mg once dailyESL 400 mg twice-dailyESL 600 mg twice dailyESL 800 mg once-dailyESL 800 mg twice daily

oral route

placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Written informed consent to participate in the study
  • Men and women aged 18 years or older
  • Previous diagnosis of herpes zoster
  • Diagnosis of postherpetic neuralgia and neuropathic pain present for more than 3 months after healing of the herpes zoster skin rash
  • Cooperation and willingness to complete all aspects of the study
  • Completion of at least 4 daily diaries during the week preceding randomisation
  • A minimum average daily pain score of 4 on the NRPS in the last 4 diary entries before randomisation.

You may not qualify if:

  • Pain of other origin that might confound the assessment of neuropathic pain of postherpetic origin
  • Active herpes zoster lesion or dermatitis of any origin at the affected site
  • Subjects who had neurological ablation by block or neurosurgical intervention for control of pain
  • Significant or unstable medical or psychiatric disorders
  • Drug or alcohol abuse in the preceding 2 years
  • Severe renal function impairment, as shown by calculated creatinine clearance values \< 30 mL/min at screening
  • Relevant clinical laboratory abnormalities (e.g., Na+ \<130 mmol/L, alanine (ALT) or aspartate (AST) transaminases \>2.0 times the upper limit of the normal, white blood cell count (WBC) \<2,500 cells/mm3)
  • Previous participation in any study with eslicarbazepine acetate
  • Pregnancy or breast feeding
  • History of hypersensitivity to the investigational products or to drugs with a similar chemical structure
  • History of non-compliance
  • Likelihood of requiring treatment during the study period with drugs or other interventions not permitted by the clinical study protocol
  • Participation in a clinical study within 3 months prior to screening
  • Any clinical significant concomitant condition which might influence the assessments or conduct of the trial.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Neuralgia, Postherpetic

Interventions

eslicarbazepine acetate

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

NeuralgiaPeripheral Nervous System DiseasesNeuromuscular DiseasesNervous System DiseasesPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Results Point of Contact

Title
Head of Clinical Research Section
Organization
Bial-Portela & CÂȘ, S.A.

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 18, 2009

First Posted

September 22, 2009

Study Start

November 1, 2007

Primary Completion

January 1, 2009

Study Completion

January 1, 2009

Last Updated

October 29, 2014

Results First Posted

May 3, 2013

Record last verified: 2014-10