Efficacy and Safety of Eslicarbazepine Acetate as Therapy for Patients With Post-Herpetic Neuralgia
1 other identifier
interventional
567
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The primary objective of the study is to assess the efficacy of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) as therapy for patients with post-herpetic neuralgia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Nov 2007
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 18, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 22, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 3, 2013
CompletedOctober 29, 2014
October 1, 2014
1.2 years
September 18, 2009
February 7, 2013
October 21, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Mean Pain (NRPS) From Baseline to Endpoint in Mean Pain
The primary efficacy variable will be based upon an 11-point (0-10) Numeric Rating Pain Scale (NRPS), where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst possible pain, to be recorded in a patient's diary upon awakening each morning. This score should reflect the patient's mean pain over the previous 24 hours. Please note that the change from baseline to endpoint in mean pain, i.e. the difference between endpoint mean pain and baseline mean pain, which are defined as follows: * Baseline mean pain is defined as the mean of the last four available ratings of average daily pain (NRPS) in the patient diary performed in the last 7 days before randomisation. * Endpoint mean pain is defined as the mean of the last four available ratings of average daily pain in the patient diary in the last 7 days of the treatment period.
baseline and 13 weeks
Other Outcomes (1)
Change in Mean Pain (NRPS) From Baseline to Endpoint by Total Daily Dose
baseline and 13 weeks
Study Arms (6)
ESL 400 mg twice-daily
EXPERIMENTALESL 400 mg twice-daily
ESL 800 mg once-daily
EXPERIMENTALESL 800 mg once-daily
ESL 600 mg twice daily
EXPERIMENTALESL 600 mg twice daily
ESL 1200 mg once daily
EXPERIMENTALESL 1200 mg once daily
ESL 800 mg twice daily
EXPERIMENTALESL 800 mg twice daily
placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORplacebo
Interventions
Scored tablets
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Written informed consent to participate in the study
- Men and women aged 18 years or older
- Previous diagnosis of herpes zoster
- Diagnosis of postherpetic neuralgia and neuropathic pain present for more than 3 months after healing of the herpes zoster skin rash
- Cooperation and willingness to complete all aspects of the study
- Completion of at least 4 daily diaries during the week preceding randomisation
- A minimum average daily pain score of 4 on the NRPS in the last 4 diary entries before randomisation.
You may not qualify if:
- Pain of other origin that might confound the assessment of neuropathic pain of postherpetic origin
- Active herpes zoster lesion or dermatitis of any origin at the affected site
- Subjects who had neurological ablation by block or neurosurgical intervention for control of pain
- Significant or unstable medical or psychiatric disorders
- Drug or alcohol abuse in the preceding 2 years
- Severe renal function impairment, as shown by calculated creatinine clearance values \< 30 mL/min at screening
- Relevant clinical laboratory abnormalities (e.g., Na+ \<130 mmol/L, alanine (ALT) or aspartate (AST) transaminases \>2.0 times the upper limit of the normal, white blood cell count (WBC) \<2,500 cells/mm3)
- Previous participation in any study with eslicarbazepine acetate
- Pregnancy or breast feeding
- History of hypersensitivity to the investigational products or to drugs with a similar chemical structure
- History of non-compliance
- Likelihood of requiring treatment during the study period with drugs or other interventions not permitted by the clinical study protocol
- Participation in a clinical study within 3 months prior to screening
- Any clinical significant concomitant condition which might influence the assessments or conduct of the trial.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Head of Clinical Research Section
- Organization
- Bial-Portela & CÂȘ, S.A.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 18, 2009
First Posted
September 22, 2009
Study Start
November 1, 2007
Primary Completion
January 1, 2009
Study Completion
January 1, 2009
Last Updated
October 29, 2014
Results First Posted
May 3, 2013
Record last verified: 2014-10