Validation of a Novel Sham Cervical Spinal Manipulation Procedure
2 other identifiers
observational
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Primary hypotheses: Ho1: In chronic neck pain patients, randomly treated with either a "sham" or "real" cervical manipulation procedure, the probability of perceiving a Real Manipulation Procedure is equal to the probability of obtaining a Real Manipulation Procedure, AND, Ho2: Spinal tenderness will remain unchanged following the treatment procedure for both groups. Secondary (null) hypotheses:
- 1.Neck pain, cervical ranges of motion and paraspinal EMG responses to pressure pain will remain unchanged in both groups;
- 2.there will be no differences between groups with respect to 2a) neck joint cavitations and 2b) forces across the cervical spine measured during the manoeuvres.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Feb 2009
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 15, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 16, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2010
CompletedNovember 17, 2010
November 1, 2010
1.7 years
September 15, 2009
November 16, 2010
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
The perception by subjects as to whether they received a real treatment (YES/NO)
10 mins
Change scores of the pressure algometry
10 mins
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Current Neck Pain, Ranges of Motion, MES Response will be analysed by comparing baseline, 15-and 120-minute score
approximately 1 hours +
Eligibility Criteria
Participants in this study will be consenting adults, 21-55 years of age, male or female who have chronic mechanical neck pain (NP) rated as between 30 and 65 on an NRS-101 scale \[74\]. For the purposes of this study NP is defined as;
You may qualify if:
- years old with chronic neck pain, Males/Females
- Between 30-60 NRS 101 Scale
- ≥ 4 weeks mechanical neck pain
You may not qualify if:
- Cervical Spine Surgery
- Medically uncontrolled High Blood Pressure
- Past History of Stroke
- Upper Respiratory Infection within 4 weeks
- Current Symptoms of Dizziness
- Tinnitus, Blurred Vision, Vertigo, Sensory Motor Disturbance
- Current use of anticoagulant therapy
- Connective Tissue Disorder
- Primary Fibromyalgia or myofascial pain
- Metabolic/Neoplastic Bone Disease
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College
Toronto, Ontario, M2H 3J1, Canada
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Howard Vernon, BA, DC, PhD, FCCS, FCCRS
CMCC
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 15, 2009
First Posted
September 16, 2009
Study Start
February 1, 2009
Primary Completion
October 1, 2010
Study Completion
October 1, 2010
Last Updated
November 17, 2010
Record last verified: 2010-11