NCT00978094

Brief Summary

Primary hypotheses: Ho1: In chronic neck pain patients, randomly treated with either a "sham" or "real" cervical manipulation procedure, the probability of perceiving a Real Manipulation Procedure is equal to the probability of obtaining a Real Manipulation Procedure, AND, Ho2: Spinal tenderness will remain unchanged following the treatment procedure for both groups. Secondary (null) hypotheses:

  1. 1.Neck pain, cervical ranges of motion and paraspinal EMG responses to pressure pain will remain unchanged in both groups;
  2. 2.there will be no differences between groups with respect to 2a) neck joint cavitations and 2b) forces across the cervical spine measured during the manoeuvres.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
80

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2009

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2009

Completed
8 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 15, 2009

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 16, 2009

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2010

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2010

Completed
Last Updated

November 17, 2010

Status Verified

November 1, 2010

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

September 15, 2009

Last Update Submit

November 16, 2010

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • The perception by subjects as to whether they received a real treatment (YES/NO)

    10 mins

  • Change scores of the pressure algometry

    10 mins

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Current Neck Pain, Ranges of Motion, MES Response will be analysed by comparing baseline, 15-and 120-minute score

    approximately 1 hours +

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years - 55 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Participants in this study will be consenting adults, 21-55 years of age, male or female who have chronic mechanical neck pain (NP) rated as between 30 and 65 on an NRS-101 scale \[74\]. For the purposes of this study NP is defined as;

You may qualify if:

  • years old with chronic neck pain, Males/Females
  • Between 30-60 NRS 101 Scale
  • ≥ 4 weeks mechanical neck pain

You may not qualify if:

  • Cervical Spine Surgery
  • Medically uncontrolled High Blood Pressure
  • Past History of Stroke
  • Upper Respiratory Infection within 4 weeks
  • Current Symptoms of Dizziness
  • Tinnitus, Blurred Vision, Vertigo, Sensory Motor Disturbance
  • Current use of anticoagulant therapy
  • Connective Tissue Disorder
  • Primary Fibromyalgia or myofascial pain
  • Metabolic/Neoplastic Bone Disease

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College

Toronto, Ontario, M2H 3J1, Canada

Location

Study Officials

  • Howard Vernon, BA, DC, PhD, FCCS, FCCRS

    CMCC

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 15, 2009

First Posted

September 16, 2009

Study Start

February 1, 2009

Primary Completion

October 1, 2010

Study Completion

October 1, 2010

Last Updated

November 17, 2010

Record last verified: 2010-11

Locations