Study Stopped
The study was terminated due to results in another study (NCT00878501).
Study to Evaluate Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of AZD1386 in Patients With Peripheral Neuropathic Pain
AVANT
A Phase IIa Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group, Multicentre Study Evaluating the Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of AZD1386 After 3 Weeks of Treatment in Patients With Posttraumatic Neuralgia (PTN) and Postherpetic Neuralgia (PHN)
1 other identifier
interventional
90
4 countries
12
Brief Summary
The primary aim of this study is to investigate if AZD1386 is efficacious as an analgesic in patients with peripheral neuropathic pain. This will be done by comparing the effect of AZD1386 to placebo ("inactive substance") on pain.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2 pain
Started Sep 2009
Shorter than P25 for phase_2 pain
12 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 9, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 14, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2010
CompletedDecember 23, 2009
December 1, 2009
September 9, 2009
December 21, 2009
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change from baseline in NRS pain (12 h-recall)
Morning and evening 12 hour recall
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Response rate, defined as any of the following:NRS (12 h recall) reduced by 30% compared to baseline and NRS (12 h recall) reduced by 50% compared to baseline
Morning and evening 12 hour recall
Response rate, defined as any of the following: At least "much improved" on Patient Global Impression of Change global and at least "much improved" on PGIC pain
Day 8, 15 and 22
Response rate, defined as any of the following: Change from baseline in Brief Pain Inventory Short Form and Change from baseline in Pain Quality Assessment Scale
Day 1 and 22
Study Arms (2)
1
EXPERIMENTAL2
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with painful symptoms due to neuropathic pain
- Provision of signed informed consent
- Non pregnant females
You may not qualify if:
- Other pain conditions that may confound assessment of neuropathic pain, as judged by the investigator
- History, and/or presence of somatic disease, which may interfere with the objectives of the study as judged by the investigator
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- AstraZenecalead
Study Sites (12)
Research Site
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Research Site
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Research Site
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Research Site
Aalborg, Denmark
Research Site
Arhus C, Denmark
Research Site
Boulogne-Billancourt, France
Research Site
Clermont-Ferrand, France
Research Site
Nice, France
Research Site
Bradford, United Kingdom
Research Site
Glasgow, United Kingdom
Research Site
London, United Kingdom
Research Site
Manchester, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Richard L Leff, md
AstraZeneca R&D Wilmington, USA
- STUDY CHAIR
Rolf Karlsten, MD
AstraZeneca R&D Södertälje, Sweden
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 9, 2009
First Posted
September 14, 2009
Study Start
September 1, 2009
Study Completion
February 1, 2010
Last Updated
December 23, 2009
Record last verified: 2009-12